Journals / International Archives of Medical Research / 2013 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Three dimensional comparison of maxillary sinus volume in patients with and without posterior crossbite Maxillary sinus volume

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Right, left and mean MS volumes of PCB patients’ were significantly lower than NCB individuals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: To compare the maxillary sinus (MS) volumes of the patients’ with and without posterior crossbite (PCB).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The CBCT scans of 2 groups were studied: (1) 50 patients (mean age: 14.39±1.32 years)without posterior crossbite (NCB); (2) 24 patients (mean age: 14.15±1.53 years) with PCB.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Right, left and mean MS volumes of PCB patients’ were significantly lower than NCB individuals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:education · periodontal disease · CPITN

Abstract

Background: To compare the maxillary sinus (MS) volumes of the patients’ with and without posterior crossbite (PCB). Method: The CBCT scans of 2 groups were studied: (1) 50 patients (mean age: 14.39±1.32 years)without posterior crossbite (NCB); (2) 24 patients (mean age: 14.15±1.53 years) with PCB. After the volume calculation with using Dolphin 11.0 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, Calif, USA) software, paired sample t test was used to compare the differences between the right and left maxillary sinus volume of each group. Independent sample t test was used to identify the left, right and mean maxillary sinus volume differences between groups. There were 372 individuals included in the study, ranging from ages 12-79, who were divided into seven groups according to age: 12-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79. CPITN values in each group were included. In addition, the level of education, frequency of brushing, and the oral appliances used in dental care were recorded. Results: No significant differences were observed between right and left maxillary sinus volume for each group (p> .05). Right, left and mean maxillary sinus volume calculated from PCB group was found significantly lower than those calculated from NCB group (p< .01). Conclusion: Right, left and mean MS volumes of PCB patients’ were significantly lower than NCB individuals

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKURT, A., DOĞRU, M., HEKİMOĞLU, S., KARADEDE, İ. (2013). Three dimensional comparison of maxillary sinus volume in patients with and without posterior crossbite Maxillary sinus volume. International Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/764821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. (2007). Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 34:191-5.
  2. Anagnostopoulou S, Venieratos D, Spyropoulos N. (1991). Classification of human maxillary sinuses according to their geometric features. Anat Anz. 173:121–30.
  3. Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH. (2005). The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 132:429-34.
  4. Sanchez Fernandez JM, Anta Escuredo JA, Sanchez Del Rey A, Montoya FS. Morphometric study of the paranasal sinuses in normal and pathological conditions. (2000) Acta Otolaryngol. 120:273–8.
  5. Lund VJ. (1997). Anatomy of the nose and paranasal sinuses. In: Kerr AG, ed. Scott Brown’s Otolaryngology. 6th ed. 1/5/1-29.
  6. Graney DO, Rice DH. Anatomy. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE. (1993) Otolaryngology: head and neck surgery, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book. 901–6.
  7. Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B. (1990) A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in children and adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 12:399–407.
  8. Isaacson JD, Ledley RS. Tooth Statics. (1964) J Am Dent Assoc. 69: 805–807.
  9. Linder-Aronson S. (1970). Adenoids. Their effects on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationships to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 265:1–132.
  10. Peltomaki T. (2007). The effect of mode of breathing on craniofacial growth: revisited. Eur J Orthod. 29: 426–429.
  11. Bresolin D, Shapiro GG, Shapiro PA, Dassel SW, Furukawa CT, Pierson WE, Chapko M, Bierman CW. (1984) Facial characteristics of children who breath through the mouth. Pediatrics. 73:622–625. Oktay H. The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different orthodontic malocclusions. (1992) Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 102:143-5.
  12. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. (1994) Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 23: 163-68.
  13. Schlueter BA. (2007) Cone Beam Computed Tomography Threedimensional Reconstruction for Evaluation of the Mandibular Condyle [thesis]. St Louis, Mo: Saint Louis University. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT de