This case highlights that the lateral window technique is a predictable and effective approach for implant site development in patients with severe posterior maxillary bone deficiency
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Limited residual bone height in the posterior maxilla often prevents implant placement and necessitates maxillary sinus floor elevation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 52-year-old male patient with inadequate residual bone height underwent lateral window sinus floor elevation with deproteinized bovine xenograft and a resorbable collagen membrane before implant rehabilitation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This case highlights that the lateral window technique is a predictable and effective approach for implant site development in patients with severe posterior maxillary bone deficiency
Limited residual bone height in the posterior maxilla often prevents implant placement and necessitates maxillary sinus floor elevation. This case report describes the management of severe posterior maxillary atrophy using the lateral window technique. A 52-year-old male patient with inadequate residual bone height underwent lateral window sinus floor elevation with deproteinized bovine xenograft and a resorbable collagen membrane before implant rehabilitation. Healing was uneventful, with no intraoperative complications, and sufficient bone volume was achieved for subsequent implant placement. This case highlights that the lateral window technique is a predictable and effective approach for implant site development in patients with severe posterior maxillary bone deficiency
Ulaştan, B. (2026). Posterior Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Prior to Implant Placement: A Case Report. International Archives of Medical Research, Volume: 18 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.56484/iamr.1987988
Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38:613-616.
Lundgren S, Cricchio G, Hallman M, Jungner M, Rasmusson L, Sennerby L. Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73:103-120.
Sabri H, Sarkarat F, Mortezagholi B, Aghajani D. Non-surgical management of oro-antral communication using platelet-rich fibrin: a review of the literature. Oral Surg 2022; 15:455-464.
Mohan N, Wolf J, Dym H. Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent Clin North Am 2015; 59:375-388.
Janner SFM, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1446-1453.
Saleh MHA, Sabri H, Di Pietro N, et al. Clinical indications and outcomes of sinus floor augmentation with bone substitutes: an evidence-based review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2025; 27.
Urban IA, Ravidà A, Saleh MHA, et al. Long-term crestal bone changes in implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal or moderate remaining alveolar bone: a 10-year retrospective case-series study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32:60-74.
Scaini R, Saleh MHA, Lai HC, Sangiorgi M, Zucchelli G, Testori T. Indications and regenerative techniques for lateral window sinus floor elevation with ridge augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2025; 27.
Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229.
Yu S, Saleh MHA, Wang HL. Simultaneous or staged lateral ridge augmentation: a clinical guideline on the decision-making process. Periodontol 2000 2023; 93:107-128.
Lyu M, Xu D, Zhang X, Yuan Q. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree. Int J Oral Sci 2023; 15:41.
Avila-Ortiz G, Vegh D, Mukaddam K, Galindo-Moreno P, Pjetursson B, Payer M. Treatment alternatives for the rehabilitation of the posterior edentulous maxilla. Periodontol 2000 2023; 93:183-204.
Starch-Jensen T, Mordenfeld A, Becktor JP, Jensen SS. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic bone substitutes compared with other grafting materials. Implant Dent 2018; 27:363-374.
Bucchi C, del Fabbro M, Arias A, et al. Multicenter study of patients' preferences and concerns regarding the origin of bone grafts utilized in dentistry. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:179-185.
Romanos GE, Romanos EB, Alqahtani F, Alqahtani M, Javed F. “Religious belief”: an undervalued ethical inclusion criterion for clinical trials on bone grafting procedures. J Relig Health 2020; 59:2928-2934.
Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019; 46 Suppl 21:307-318.
Garbacea A, Lozada JL, Church CA, et al. The incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during endoscopically assessed crestal sinus floor elevation: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38:345-359.
Nemati M, Khodaverdi N, Aboul Hosn Centenero S, Tabrizi R. Which factors affect the risk of membrane perforation in lateral window maxillary sinus elevation? A prospective cohort study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2023; 51:427-432.
Alqutaibi AY, Baik AA, Borzangy S. Smokers may be subject to a higher risk of Schneiderian membrane perforation than nonsmokers during maxillary sinus augmentation. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2023; 23:101887.