Journals / GSI Journals Serie C: Advancements in Information Sciences and Technologies / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Design Of Development Scenarios For Şanlıurfa Region Based On Geodesign

Pages
92–117
Publication Date
2020-09-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this paper is to show how different development scenarios can be developed for an underdeveloped region in Southeastern Turkey based on the anticipatory change model defined by Steinitz”s Geodesign framework.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become an indispensable part of urban and regional planning since the 90ies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a methodology that combines tools of design, GIS and web 2.0 to foster participatory planning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this paper is to show how different development scenarios can be developed for an underdeveloped region in Southeastern Turkey based on the anticipatory change model defined by Steinitz”s Geodesign framework.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geodesign · GIS · regional planning

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become an indispensable part of urban and regional planning since the 90ies. Yet, one of the limitations of classical GIS is the lack to directly support the way how the planning process is carried out. They lack the capability to encourage the cooperation of stakeholders that have very different levels of computer literacy and come from very divers sectors. For this, different approaches for participatory planning have been developed among them Geodesign. It is a methodology that combines tools of design, GIS and web 2.0 to foster participatory planning. A complete framework for conducting Geodesign as applied to regional landscape studies has been generated by Carl Steinitz. With GeodesignHub (GDH), his framework was converted into its digital representation that enables a digital design workflow online. The purpose of this paper is to show how different development scenarios can be developed for an underdeveloped region in Southeastern Turkey based on the anticipatory change model defined by Steinitz”s Geodesign framework.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERNST, F., ÇULLU, M. A., BENEK, S., SİVEREKLİ, E., ERDOĞAN, S., AYDEMİR, A., YENİGÜN, İ., MEMDUHOGLU, A., KARABULUT, A. I., YILDIRIM, Ö. A., KARAGÖZ, G. M. (2020). Design Of Development Scenarios For Şanlıurfa Region Based On Geodesign. GSI Journals Serie C: Advancements in Information Sciences and Technologies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 92–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/762164

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Arciniegas, G., & Janssen, R. (2012). Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops. Landscape Urban Plan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107 (3), 332-342. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.004 2. Aydyn, Y., Cetinkökü, O., Kanber R., Özekici, B., Özmen, S., Steduto, P., Ünlü, M. (2003). Growth, yield and periodicity of pistachio under different water and nutritional levels: investigation in the Southeastern Anatolia project region (GAP). In: Hamdy, A. (ed.). Regional Action Programme (RAP): Water resources management and water saving in irrigated agriculture (WASIA PROJECT). (pp. 183-201) (Options Méditerranéennes: Série B. Etudes et Recherches; n. 44). Bari:CIHEAM. 3. Bakır, N. Y., Doğan, U., Güngör, M.K., Bostancı, B. (2018). Planned development versus unplanned change: The effects on urban planning in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 77, September 2018, 310-321. 4. Ballal, H. (2015). Collaborative planning with digital design synthesis. Doctoral dissertation. University College London. 5. Benek, S., Elmastaş, N., Yetmen, H., Özcanlı, M., Şahinalp, M. S., Aytaç, A. S., Şahap, A. (2016). Harran Üniversitesi Osmanbey Kampüsü'nün Coğrafi Etüdü. Istanbul, Turkey: Kriter Yayınevi. 6. Campagn, M., Steinitz, C., Di Cesare, E.A., Cocco, C., Ballal, H., Canfield, T. (2016). Collaboration in planning: The Geodesign approach. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 35: 55–72. 7. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Savenije, H.H.G., Gautam, R. (2005). The water footprint of cotton consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 18. 2601 DA Delft, The Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE Delft. 8. Çelik, Ş. (2013). Türkiye’de Gecekondu Sorunu ve Gecekondu Sorunun Sinemaya yansıtılması. Yazılar ve Vakainamele. Retrieved June 27, 2019 from https://safiicelik.blogspot.com/2013/11/turkiyedegecekondu-sorunu-ve-gecekondu.html 9. Ernst, F. (2016). GEODESIGN – THE FUTURE OF GIS. 6. UZAKTAN ALGILAMA-CBS SEMPOZYUMU (UZAL-CBS 2016), pp. 510-519. 5-7 Ekim 2016, Adana/Turkey. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from http://uzalcbs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_1036.pdf. 10. Ernst, F., Şenol, H.İ., Akdağ, S., Barutcuoglu, ö. (2019). Virtual Reality for City Planning. 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality. 4.-5.4.2019, Şanlıurfa/Turkey, pp.146-153. Retrieved 24.7. from virtualreality.harran.edu.tr 11. Ernst, F. B., Erdoğan, S., Yılmaz, M., Ulukavak, M., Şenol, H. İ., Memduhoğlu, A. and Çullu, M. A. (2019). Geodesign for Urban Planning: A Case Study from Harran Uni