Journals / Paradigma / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

THE MEDIATOR ROLE OF SUCCESS EFFORTS ON THE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE RISK-TAKING BEHAVIORS ON THEIR PERFORMANCE

ÇALIŞANLARIN RİSK ALMA DAVRANIŞLARININ PERFORMANSLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE BAŞARI ÇABALARININ ARACI ROLÜ

Journal
Paradigma
Pages
133–148
Publication Date
2021-01-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, it was concluded that success efforts have a full mediating effect on the effect of risk taking behaviours of employees on their performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s organizations, employees can display risky behaviours towards their jobs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to these risky behaviours, it is observed that employees make many efforts to achieve their performance at optimal levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, it was concluded that success efforts have a full mediating effect on the effect of risk taking behaviours of employees on their performance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Risk Alma Davranışı · Performans · Başarı Çabası

Abstract

In today’s organizations, employees can display risky behaviours towards their jobs. In addition to these risky behaviours, it is observed that employees make many efforts to achieve their performance at optimal levels. In the literature review, it is seen that the negative effects of risky behaviours of employees on organizations are examined in general, but there is no study aiming to measure the possible role of success efforts in the effect of employees' risk-taking behaviours on their performance. The convenience sampling method was preferred to obtain the data needed in the study and structural equation modelling was applied in the analysis of the data. As a result of the research, it is revealed that the risk taking behaviours of the employees affect both their success efforts and their performances positively and significantly. It is understood that the success efforts of the employees have a positive and significant effect on their performance. In the study, it was concluded that success efforts have a full mediating effect on the effect of risk taking behaviours of employees on their performance.

Özet

Günümüz organizasyonlarında çalışanlar işlerine yönelik riskli davranışlar sergileyebilmektedirler. Çalışanların bu riskli davranışlarının yanında performanslarını optimal seviyelerde gerçekleştirebilmek için birçok çaba sarf ettikleri gözlemlenmektedir. Yapılan yazın taramasında genel olarak çalışanların riskli davranışlarının organizasyonlar üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinin incelendiği görülmekle birlikte, çalışanların risk alma davranışlarının performansları üzerindeki etkisinde başarı çabalarının olası rolünü ölçmeyi amaçlayan herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Çalışmada ihtiyaç duyulan verinin elde edilmesinde kolayda örneklem metodu tercih edilmiş ve verilerin analizinde yapısal eşitlik modellemesi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda çalışanların risk alma davranışlarının hem başarı çabalarını hem de performanslarını pozitif ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği ortaya konulmaktadır. Çalışanların başarı çabalarının ise performanslarını yine pozitif ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği anlaşılmaktadır. Araştırmada ayrıca çalışanların risk alma davranışlarının performansları üzerindeki etkisinde başarı çabalarının tam aracı etkiye sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYÜZ, A. M., DURMUŞ, İ. (2021). THE MEDIATOR ROLE OF SUCCESS EFFORTS ON THE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE RISK-TAKING BEHAVIORS ON THEIR PERFORMANCE. Paradigma, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 133–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/761904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AKÇAY, Yeliz ve Ahmet Mutlu AKYUZ (2014), “Çalışanların Dönüşümcü Lidere Yönelik Sadakatleri ile Çalışanlardaki Empati Davranışının Bu Sadakat Üzerindeki Olası Etkilerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Turkish Studies, 9 (5), 157-184.
  2. ALTUNIŞIK, Remzi, Recai COSKUN, Serkan BAYRAKTAROGLU ve Engin YILDIRIM (2010), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamaları, 6. Baskı, Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF: Sakarya. ARIANI, Dorothea Wahyu (2013), “The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior”, International Journal of Business Administration, 4 (2), 46-56.
  3. AVEY, James, Tara S. WERNSING ve Fred LUTHANS (2008), “Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors”, Published in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48-70.
  4. BARRICK, Murray R., Greg L. STEWART ve Mike PIOTROESKI (2002), “Personality and Job Performance: Test of the Mediating Effects of Motivation Among Sales Representatives”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (1), 1-9.
  5. BAROUDI, Jack J. ve Magid IGBARIA (1995), “An Examination of Gender Effects on Career Success of Information Systems Employees”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (3), 181-201.
  6. BOEHM, Julia K. ve Sonja LYUBOMIRSKY (2008), “Does Happiness Promote Career Success?”, Journal of Career Assessment, 16 (1), 101-116.
  7. BOMMER, William H., Jonathan L. JOHNSON, Gregory A. RICH, Philip M. PODSAKOFF ve Scott B. MACKENZIE (1995), “On the Interchangeability of Objective and Subjective Measures of Employee Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 48, 587-605.
  8. BONIFIELD, Carolyn ve Catherine A. COLE (2008), “Better him Than Me: Social Comparison Theory and Service Recovery”, Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 565-577.
  9. CADSBY, C. BRAM, Fei SONG, Jim ENGLE-WARNICK ve Tony FANG (2019), “Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Performance by Ranking Employees: The Moderating Effects of Public Ranking, Rank Pay, and Individual Risk Attitude”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 64-79.
  10. CAMPBELL, Donald J. (1993-2005), “The Proactive Employee: Managing Workplace Initiative”, The Academy of Management Executive, 14 (3), 52-66.
  11. CHEN, Xiao-Ping, Marion B. EBERLY, Ting-Ju CHIANG, Jiing-Lih FARH & Bor-Shiuan CHENG (2011), “Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance”, Journal of Management, 20 (10), 1-23.
  12. CHEN, Zhe