Journals / European Annals of Dental Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Different Beverages’ Effect on Microhardness and Surface Roughness of Different Artificial Teeth

Pages
88–94
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Microfiller composite resin teeth could have the ideal surface properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study evaluated the microhardness and surface roughness of four artificial teeth type against various beverages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From each group, 10 maxillary first and second molars were immersed in 5 beverages (tea, filtered coffee, cola, cherry juice, and distilled water.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Microfiller composite resin teeth could have the ideal surface properties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:artificial tooth · beverages · microhardness

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the microhardness and surface roughness of four artificial teeth type against various beverages. Materials and Methods: Conventional acrylic resin, reinforced acrylic resin, microfiller composite resin, and nanofiller composite resin teeth were used. From each group, 10 maxillary first and second molars were immersed in 5 beverages (tea, filtered coffee, cola, cherry juice, and distilled water. The test period of 24 hours appears comparable to approximately 1 month of normal beverage consumption. The test periods used in this study were arranged according to this protocol and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of normal beverage consumptions were simulated. Vickers microhardness and surface roughness of denture teeth were measured for each test period. Results: The microhardness values significantly decreased in all beverages especially in 6th month. The surface roughness values significantly increased in all beverages especially in 3th month. There were no statistically significant differences between the beverages. Microfiller composite resin denture teeth had the highest microhardness values and the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusions: Different types of beverages consumed daily negatively affect the microhardness and surface roughness of artificial teeth. Microfiller composite resin teeth could have the ideal surface properties.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, Ş. T., ÖZKAN, P. (2021). Evaluation of Different Beverages’ Effect on Microhardness and Surface Roughness of Different Artificial Teeth. European Annals of Dental Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 88–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/757220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ergün G, Özkan Y, Bek B. Color stability of different denture teeth materials: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci. 2001
  2. 43(3):193-205. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.43.193 2. Hao Z, Yin H, Wang L, Meng Y. Wear behavior of seven artificial resin teeth assessed with three-dimensional measurements. J Prosthet Dent. 2014
  3. 112(6):1507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.030 3. Duke ES. Has dentistry moved into the nanotechnology era? Compend Contin Edu Dent. 2003
  4. 24(5):380-2. 4. Atabek D, Sillelioglu H, Olmez A. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish. Oper Dent. 2010
  5. 35(3):362-69. doi: 10.2341/09-196-T 5. Bayne SB. Dental Biomaterials: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? J Dent Educ. 2005
  6. 69(5):571-78. 6. Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent. 2007
  7. 32(1):45-52. doi: 10.2341/06-9 7. Uehara PN, Iegami CM, Tamaki R, Ballester RY, de Souza RM, Laganá DC. Analysis of behavior of the wear coefficient in different layers of acrylic resin teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2019
  8. 121(6):967.e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.022 8. Köksal T, Dikbas I. Color stability of different denture teeth materials against various staining agents. Dent Mater J. 2008
  9. 27(1):139-44. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.139 9. Yuzugullu B, Acar O, Cetinsahin C, Celik C. Effect of different denture cleansers on surface roughness and microhardness of artificial denture teeth. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 8:333-8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.333 10. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2002
  10. 15(3):243-47. 11. Kamonwanon P, Yodmongkol S, Chantarachindawong R, Thaweeboon S, Thaweeboon B, Srikhirin T. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015
  11. 114(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.013 12. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th Ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby, Inc., 2002. p. 672-75. 13. Loyaga-Rendon PG, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I, Iwasaki N. Compositional characteristics and hardness of acrylic and composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2007
  12. 98(2):141-49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60047-X. 14. Imamura S, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I, Loyaga-Rendon PG, Minakuchi S. Effect of filler type and polishing on the discoloration of composite resin artificial teeth.