Journals / Eurasian Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

ASYMMETRIC GARCH-TYPE AND HALF-LIFE VOLATILITY MODELLING OF USD/KZT EXCHANGE RATE RETURNS

Pages
7–18
Publication Date
2020-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the Kazakhstan foreign exchange market, the EGARCH (1.1)-GED model which accommodates the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Empirical studies have shown that a large number of financial assets returns exhibit fat tails (leptokurtosis) and are often characterized by volatility clustering and asymmetry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper considers the ability of the asymmetric GARCHtype models to capture the stylized features of volatility in USD/KZT exchange rate returns.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the Kazakhstan foreign exchange market, the EGARCH (1.1)-GED model which accommodates the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EGARCH · GJRGARCH · APGARCH

Abstract

Empirical studies have shown that a large number of financial assets returns exhibit fat tails (leptokurtosis) and are often characterized by volatility clustering and asymmetry. This paper considers the ability of the asymmetric GARCHtype models to capture the stylized features of volatility in USD/KZT exchange rate returns. Therefore, the half-life parameter of the USD/KZT returns series were calculated for three sub-periods. The results revealed that the half-life was 6 days, 16 days and 12 days for 1st sub-period, 2nd sub-period and 3rd sub-period respectively. According to the results, in the presence of asymmetric responses to innovations in the Kazakhstan foreign exchange market, the EGARCH (1.1)-GED model which accommodates the kurtosis of financial time series is preferred. Also, these results show that the USD/KZT exchange rate returns have strong mean reversion and short half-life.

🔖

Cite This Article

URAL, M., DEMIRELI, E. (2020). ASYMMETRIC GARCH-TYPE AND HALF-LIFE VOLATILITY MODELLING OF USD/KZT EXCHANGE RATE RETURNS. Eurasian Research Journal, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 7–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/757169

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Abdalla, Suliman Z.S. (2012). “Modelling Exchange Rate Volatility Using GARCH Models: Empirical Evidence from Arab Countries”. International Journal of Economics and Finance 4(3): 216-229.
  2. Ahmed, Rizwan R., Jolita Vveinhardt, Dalia Streimikiene and Zahid A. Channar (2018). “Mean Reversion in International Markets: Evidence from G.A.R.C.H. and Half-Life Volatility Models”. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 31(1): 1198-1217.
  3. Baltagi, Badi H. (2000).
  4. Econometrics, Fourth Edition.
  5. Springer Press.
  6. USA. Bollerslev, Tim (1986). “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity”. Journal of Econometrics 31(3): 307-327.
  7. Bollerslev, Tim (1987). “A Conditionally Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return”. Review of Economics and Statistics 69(3): 542-547.
  8. Box, G.E.P. and David R. Cox (1964). “An Analysis of Transformation”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 26(2): 211-252.
  9. Brooks, Chris (2002). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge University Press.
  10. UK. Chatfield, Chris (2003). The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, Sixth Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC Publishing. USA. Ding, Zhuanxin, Clive W.J. Granger and Robert F. Engle (1993). “A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model”. Journal of Empirical Finance 1(1): 83-106.
  11. Engle, Robert F. and Andrew J. Patton (2001). “What Good is a Volatility Model”. Quantitative Finance 1(2): 237–245.
  12. Engle, Robert F. (1982). “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation”. Econometrica 50(4): 987–1007.
  13. Fiser, Radovan and Roman Horvath (2010). “Central Bank Communication and Exchange Rate Volatility: A GARCH Analysis”. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies 3(1): 25-31.
  14. Gbenro, Nathaniel and Richard K. Moussa (2019). “Asymmetric Mean Reversion in Low Liquid Markets: Evidence from BRVM”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12(38): 1-19.
  15. Glosten, G. Lawrence, Ravi Jagannathan and David E. Runkle (1993). “On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks”. Journal of Finance 48(5): 1779-1801.
  16. Hafner, Christian M. (1998). “Estimating High-Frequency Foreign Exchange Rate Volatility with Nonparametric ARCH Models”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 68(2): 247-269.
  17. Hamadu, Dallah and Ismaila Adeleke (2009). “On Modelling the Nigerian Currency (Naira) Exchange Rates Against Major Regional and World Currencies