Journals / Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Phosphorous Fertilizer and Bacterial Applications on Seed Yield of Morphologically Different Forage Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties

Pages
14–23
Publication Date
2019-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, number of pods per plant 6.5-7.7, number of seeds per pod 5.6-6.2, 1000 seed weight 187.5-198.9 g, seed yield 1087-1663 kg/ha, seed crude protein content 30.6-31.6 % were investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a result of today's modern agricultural practices, many negative consequences have been encountered due to the use of intense, inaccurate and excessive chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, carried out in Erzurum, was aimed to determine the effects of different phosphorous rates (0, 30 and 60 kg/ha P2O5) and bacteria genotypes (control, nitrogen fixing and phosphate solvent) on agricultural and morphological characteristics of some fodder pea cultivars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, number of pods per plant 6.5-7.7, number of seeds per pod 5.6-6.2, 1000 seed weight 187.5-198.9 g, seed yield 1087-1663 kg/ha, seed crude protein content 30.6-31.6 % were investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bacteria inoculation · environmental pollution · forage pea

Abstract

As a result of today's modern agricultural practices, many negative consequences have been encountered due to the use of intense, inaccurate and excessive chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In particular, chemical fertilizers have reached fresh water sources as a result of washing, causing environmental pollution and this has become a threat to human, domestic and wildlife. Therefore, one of the alternatives created by experts in terms of prevention of environmental pollution and agricultural sustainability has been the use of useful bacteria instead of chemical input. In this study, carried out in Erzurum, was aimed to determine the effects of different phosphorous rates (0, 30 and 60 kg/ha P2O5) and bacteria genotypes (control, nitrogen fixing and phosphate solvent) on agricultural and morphological characteristics of some fodder pea cultivars. The experiment was established in Randomized Split Blocks Trial Design with three replications. In the study, were used Kirazli (semi-leafless) and Urunlu (leafed) pea cultivars, Rhizobium leguminasorum and Arthrobacter agilis bacteria and triple superphosphate 0-45-0 fertilizer. According to the results, number of pods per plant 6.5-7.7, number of seeds per pod 5.6-6.2, 1000 seed weight 187.5-198.9 g, seed yield 1087-1663 kg/ha, seed crude protein content 30.6-31.6 % were investigated. As a result; no response was observed for phosphate fertilization since the soils of experiment plots were rich of this nutrient. Yet, Rhizobium inoculation yielded positive and significant results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KADIOĞLU, S., KADIOĞLU, B., KOÇ, A. (2019). Effect of Phosphorous Fertilizer and Bacterial Applications on Seed Yield of Morphologically Different Forage Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 14–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/755903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. References Acıkgöz E & Uzun A. 1997. Yarı Yapraklı ve Normal Yapraklı Bezelye (Pisum sativum L.) Çeşitlerinden Geliştirilen Melez Hatların Bazı Tarımsal ve Morfolojik Özellikleri, Türkiye 2. Tarla Bit. Kong, 22-25 Eylül 1997, Samsun. Acıkgöz E. 2001. Yem Bitkileri (Yenilenmiş 3. Baskı), Uludağ Üni. Vakfı Yayın No: 182, Bursa, p,584. Alan M.N. 1984. Bezelye El Kitabı. Ege Bölgesi Zirai Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, No: 37, Menemen- İzmir. Altın M.1991. Yem Bitkileri Yetiştirme Tekniği (Yem Bitkileri Tarımı), Trakya Üniversitesi Tekirdağ Zir. Fak. Yayın No:114. Ders Kitabı No,3. Tekirdağ,116. Anlarsal A. E., Yucel C. & Ozveren D. 2001. Çukurova Koşullarında Bazı Bezelye (P. sativum ssp. sativum L. ve P. sativum ssp. arvense L.) Hatlarının Uyumu ve Verimlerinin Saptanması Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Çukurova Üni. Zir. Fak. Derg, 16(3),11-20. Anonymous 2004.
  2. Tohumluk Tescil Raporu, Tohumluk Kontrol ve Sertifikasyon Merkezi, Ankara. Bayraktar K. 1981. Sebze Yetiştirme II. E. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yay. No:169, İzmir.
  3. Biarnes-Dumoulin, V., Denis J. B. Lejeune-Henaut I. & Eteve G. 1996. İnterpeting Yield Instability in Pea Using Genotypic and Environmental Covarates, Crop Sci, 36,115-120.
  4. Cakmakcı R., Donmez F. Aydın A. & Sahin, F. 2006. Growth Promotion of Plants by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Under Greenhouse and Two Different Field Soil Conditions, Soil Biol. Biochem, 38, 1482-1487.
  5. Davies D. R., Berry G.J. Heath M. C. & Dawkins T.C.K.1985. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) İn: summerfield R.J. & Roberts E.H. (Eds.), Grain Legume Crops, Ch 5, Collins, London, 147-198.
  6. Dwivedi S. L., Nigeum S. N. Nageswara Rao R. C. Sningh U. & Rao K.V.S. 1996. Effect of Drought on Oil Fatty Acids and Protein Contents of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) Seeds, Fields Crop Res, 48:,125-133.
  7. Erman M., Yıldırım B. & Togay N. 2009. Effect of Phosphorous Aplication and Rhizobium Inoculation on The Yield, Nodulation and Nutrient Uptake in Field Pea (Pisum sativum sp. arvense L) Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advences, 8(2), 301–304, 2009. ISSN:1680-5593, Medwell Journals, 301-304. Genckan M. S. 1983.
  8. Yem Bitkileri Tarımı, E. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yay, No, 467, p,230-23.
  9. Guilioni L., Wery J. & Lecouer J. 2003. High Temperature and Water Deficit May Reduce Seed Number in Field Pea Purely by Decreasing Plant Growth Rate, Functional Plant Biology, 30, 1151-1164. Heath M. C. & Hebblethwaite P. D. 1985. Agronomic Problems Associated With The Pea Crop. In: Hebblewaite P.D. Heath M.C. & Dawkins T.C.K