Journals / Ekonomi-tek / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Wallerstein and World-System Approach: A Reassessment

Wallerstein ve Dünya-Sistem Yaklaşımı: Bir Yeniden Değerlendirme

Pages
101–127
Publication Date
2020-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this direction, a framework has been put forward on how to re-evaluate theoretical criticism against the approach and to re-synthesize the world-system approach for the macro history studies in the 21st century.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Understanding the dynamics and its economic, social, and economic implications of capital accumulation is one of the most important and alive areas in the social sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The world-system approach put forward by Wallerstein was also one of the approaches that had a great impact on the social sciences literature especially during 1970-1990, but it was largely neglected, especially in the 2000s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this direction, a framework has been put forward on how to re-evaluate theoretical criticism against the approach and to re-synthesize the world-system approach for the macro history studies in the 21st century.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Immanuel Wallerstein · dünya sistemi · modern dünya-sistemi

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics and its economic, social, and economic implications of capital accumulation is one of the most important and alive areas in the social sciences. The different conceptual, theoretical backgrounds and analysis tools used in searching for an answer on this subject have created a wide literature. The world-system approach put forward by Wallerstein was also one of the approaches that had a great impact on the social sciences literature especially during 1970-1990, but it was largely neglected, especially in the 2000s. However, it is still an approach that will be able to provide important tools in understanding the continuities and transformations in the world economy, historicize the actors and which allows to create interdisciplinary interaction. For this reason, in this study, the fundamentals of the world-systems approach have been opened for discussion. In this direction, a framework has been put forward on how to re-evaluate theoretical criticism against the approach and to re-synthesize the world-system approach for the macro history studies in the 21st century.

Özet

Sermaye birikim sürecinin dinamiklerinin ve bunun ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel yansımalarının anlaşılması, sosyal bilimlerin en önemli ve güncel tartışma alanlarından biridir. Bu konuya ilişkin yanıt ararken kullanılan kavramsal, teorik arka plan ve analiz aracı farklılıkları çok geniş bir literatür yaratmıştır. Wallerstein tarafından ortaya konan dünya-sistemi yaklaşımı da özellikle 1970-1990 yılları boyunca sosyal bilimler literatürüne büyük etki etmiş yaklaşımlardan biridir, ancak özellikle 2000’li yıllarda büyük ölçüde gözden düşmüştür. Buna rağmen bu yaklaşım, dünya ekonomisindeki süreklilik ve dönüşümlerin kavranmasında, analize konu olan aktörlerin tarihselleştirilmesinde önemli araçlar sağlayabilecek ve disiplinler arası etkileşimi mümkün kılan analiz araçlarına sahip bir yaklaşımdır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada, dünya sistemleri yaklaşımının temel dayanakları tartışmaya açılmış, bu doğrultuda kurama yönelik eleştirilerin yeniden değerlendirilerek ve 21. yüzyıl makro tarih çalışmalarına kılavuzluk edecek biçimde nasıl yeniden sentezlenebileceğine ilişkin bir çerçeve ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZAL, Ö. E. (2020). Wallerstein and World-System Approach: A Reassessment. Ekonomi-tek, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 101–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/753660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1991), Before European hegemony: The world system AD 1250-1350, USA: Oxford University Press.
  2. Arrighi, G. (1998), “Capitalism and the Modern World-System: Rethinking the Nondebates of the 1970's,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 1(21): 113-129.
  3. Bacha, E. L. (1978), “An Interpretation of Unequal Exchange from Prebisch-Singer to Emmanuel,” Journal of Development Economics, 4(5): 319-330.
  4. Bergesen, A. (1984), “The Critique of World-System Theory: Class Relations or Division of Labor?” Sociological Theory, 2: 365-372.
  5. Bergesen, A. J., ve Bartley, T. (2000), “World System and Ecosystem,” E. T. Hall, der. içinde, A World-Systems Reader: New Perspectives on Gender, Urbanism, Cultures, Indigenous Peoples, and Ecology. Lanham, ABD: Rowman ve Littlefield Publishers.
  6. Braudel, F. (1972), The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Siân Reynolds (Çev.), New York, 1973. Harper & Row Publishers.
  7. Brenner, R. (1977), “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism,” New Left Review, 104: 25-92.
  8. Chase-Dunn, C., ve Grimes, P. (1995), “World-Systems Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology, 21: 387-417.
  9. Chase-Dunn, C., ve Hall, T. D. (1997). Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems (New Perspectives in Sociology), Oxford, Westview Press.
  10. Dobb, M. (2007), Kapitalizmin Gelişimi Üzerine İncelemeler, (F. Akar, Çev.) İstanbul:
  11. Belge Uluslararası Yayıncılık. Frank, A. G. (1966), “The Development of Underdevelopment,” Monthly Review, 18(4): 17-31.
  12. Frank, A. G., ve Gills, B. K. (2003), Andre Gunder Frank ve Barry K. Gills’in Ön Sözü. A. G. Frank, ve B. K. Gills, der. içinde, Dünya sistemi: Beş yüzyıllık mı, beş binyıllık mı? (E. Soğancılar, Çev.). İstanbul:
  13. İmge Yayınları.
  14. Gereffi, G., M. Korzeniewicz ve R. P. Korzeniewicz (1994), “Introduction: Global Commodity Chains,” Garry Gereffi, der. içinde, Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism Londra, ABD: Greenwood Publishing Group: 1-15.
  15. Goldstein, J. S. (1988), Long Cycles: Prosperity and War in the Modern Age, New Haven and London, Yale University Press.
  16. Gülalp, H. (1993),
  17. Kapitalizm, Sınıflar ve Devlet, İstanbul:
  18. Belge Yayınları.
  19. Hall, T. D. (1986), “Incorporation in the World-System: Toward a Critique,” American Sociological Review, 3(51): 390-402.
  20. Hopkins, T., ve Wallerstein, I. (1979), “Cyclical Rhythms and Secular Trends of Capitalist World-Economy: Some Premises, Hypothesis, and Questions,” Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 2(4): 483-500.
  21. Karatani, K. (2017), Dü