SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Westphalian Devletler Sistemi ve Modernleşmenin Geleneksel Dünyanın Büyük Güçleri Olan İmparatorluklara Etkisi

Merve Suna ÖZEL ÖZCAN
Pages
49–62
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, the scope and boundaries of this study will focus on two major transformations , Westhalia and modernization periods, in order to see the historical change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The empire is the focal points of power in the quest for hierarchical superiority that provides power and space for movement within the anarchic structure of the international system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, the international relations system established with Westphalia which based about 400 years, is actually a dimension of the power reading that has existed for centuries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, the scope and boundaries of this study will focus on two major transformations , Westhalia and modernization periods, in order to see the historical change.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İmparatorluk · Westphalia

Özet

The empire is the focal points of power in the quest for hierarchical superiority that provides power and space for movement within the anarchic structure of the international system. The history of empires has equivalent historical root as well as human history. In this respect, the international relations system established with Westphalia which based about 400 years, is actually a dimension of the power reading that has existed for centuries. On the other hand, modernization reshape and create identity and civilization in world history. With this new approach Europe start to impress World System. In this period, the transformation of the empires into great powers forced the traditional ones to become modern. Hence, our modern and traditional world imagination determines the historical boundaries of this creation. So, the scope and boundaries of this study will focus on two major transformations , Westhalia and modernization periods, in order to see the historical change.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, M. S. Ö. (2019). Westphalian Devletler Sistemi ve Modernleşmenin Geleneksel Dünyanın Büyük Güçleri Olan İmparatorluklara Etkisi. Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 49–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/753539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Referans Adda, J. (2017),
  2. Ekonominin Küreselleşmesi, Çev. Sevgi İneci, İstanbul:
  3. İletişim Yayınları.
  4. Referans Altun, F. (2005), Modernleşme Kuramı Eleştirel Bir Giriş, İstanbul:
  5. Küre Yayınları.Referans Asch, R. G. (2002), “Otuz Yıl Savaşları Önemi: 1598-1648”,
  6. Ed. Jeremy Black, Top, Tüfek Ve Süngü Yeniçağda Savaş Sanatı: 1453-1815, Çev. Yavuz Alogan İstanbul:
  7. Kitap Yayınevi Referans Doyle, M., (1986),
  8. Empires, Ithaca And London Cornell University Press.Referans Eisenstadt, S. N. (2014), Modernleşme: Başkaldırı Ve Değişim, Çev. Ufuk Coşkun, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2014Referans Frank, A. G.; Gılls K. B., (2003), “ The five thousand year world system in theory and praxis “, Ed. Robert A.Denemark, Jonathan Friedman, Barry K.Gills, and George Modelski, World System History The Social Science Of Long-Term Change, London: Routledge Publish, ss. 3-23Referans Ferro, M., (2002), Sömürgecilik Tarihi Fetihlerden Bağımsızlık Hareketlerine 13. Yüzyıl- 20. Yüzyıl, Çev. Muna Cedden, İstanbul:
  9. İletişim Yayınları.Referans Harman, C., (2016). Halkların Dünya Tarihi Taş Devri’nden Yeni Binyıla, Çev. Uygur Kocabaşoğlu,İstanbul:
  10. Yordam Kitabevi.Referans Heywood, A., (2013),
  11. Küresel Siyaset, Çev. Nasuh Uslu ve Haluk Özdemir, Ankara:
  12. Liberte Yayınları.Kodaman, B., (2007) “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Yükseliş ve Çöküş Sebeplerine Genel Bakış”, SDÜ Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 16, ss. 1-24.Referans Keyman, F., (2006), “Küreselleşme, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Hegemonya”, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 9, ss. 1-20.Referans Krasner, S. D., (1993) “Westphalia and All That”, Ed. Judith Goldstein ve Robert O. Keohane, Ideas and Foreign Policy Beliefs Institutions and Political Change, Newyok: Cornell University Press.Referans Kurubaş, E. (2012) “Uluslararası İlişkiler Düşüncesi Ve Dünya Politikasında Değişimi Anlamak”, Kırıkkale Üniversityesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 2 Sayı 1, ss. 9-34.Referans Levy, J. S., (1983),
  13. War in the Modern Great Power System, USA: The Unıversıty Press Of Kentucky, 1983.Referans Modelski, G. (1987),
  14. Long Cycles in World Politics, London: Palgrave Macmillan.---------------, (2003), “World System Evolution”, Ed. Robert A.Denemark, Jonathan Friedman, Barry K.Gills, and George Modelski, World System History The Social Science Of Long-Term Change, London: Routledge Publish, ss. 24-53.Referans Münkler, H., (2009), İmparatorluklar: Eski Roma’dan ABD’ye Dünya Egemenliğinin Mantığı, Çev. Zehra Aksu Yılmazer, İstanbul: İletişim