Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / İşletme Kamu ve Ekonomi 2020 Özel Sayısı

INVESTIGATION OF THE DIFFERENCES IN CONSUMER PRICE PERCEPTION IN TERMS OF DISCOUNT LEVELS AND SOCIAL CLASSES

İNDİRİM DÜZEYLERİ VE SOSYAL SINIFLAR AÇISINDAN TÜKETİCİ FİYAT ALGISINDAKİ FARKLILIKLARIN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
1075–1103
Publication Date
2020-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the analysis results, it was determined that there are statistically significant differences between social classes in the context of price consciousness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine differences of consumers’ price perception according to discount level and social classes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, surveys prepared to measure price consciousness, value consciousness, sale proneness and purchasing intention variables for 400 consumers in different social classes living in Mersin province were applied face to face and online.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the analysis results, it was determined that there are statistically significant differences between social classes in the context of price consciousness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:sosyal sınıf · fiyat algısı · indirim düzeyi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine differences of consumers’ price perception according to discount level and social classes. Accordingly, surveys prepared to measure price consciousness, value consciousness, sale proneness and purchasing intention variables for 400 consumers in different social classes living in Mersin province were applied face to face and online. The Quota sampling method was used in the study. Multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) was used to analyze the data obtained. In this study, multivariate covariance analysis is used to test the differences in terms of price consciousness, value consciousness and purchasing intention among the groups examined. In addition, sale proneness was included in the analysis as a covariance variable. According to the analysis results, it was determined that there are statistically significant differences between social classes in the context of price consciousness.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, indirim düzeyi ve sosyal sınıflar bağlamında tüketicilerin fiyat algılarındaki farklılıkları tespit etmektir. Bu doğrultuda Mersin ilinde yaşayan farklı sosyal sınıflardaki 400 tüketiciye kota örneklemesi yoluyla yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi olarak anketler uygulanış ve fiyat bilinci, değer bilinci, indirim duyarlılığı ile satın alma niyeti değişkenleri ölçülmüştür. Elde verilerin analizinde çok değişkenli kovaryans analizi (MANCOVA) kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, çok değişkenli kovaryans analizi, araştırmada incelenen gruplar arasında; fiyat bilinci, değer bilinci ve satın alma niyeti bağlamında farklılıklarını test etmek için kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca araştırmada indirim duyarlılığı kovaryans değişken olarak analize dahil edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre fiyat bilinci bağlamında sosyal sınıflar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATILGAN, K. Ö., KOÇ, O. (2020). INVESTIGATION OF THE DIFFERENCES IN CONSUMER PRICE PERCEPTION IN TERMS OF DISCOUNT LEVELS AND SOCIAL CLASSES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, İşletme Kamu ve Ekonomi 2020 Özel Sayısı, 1075–1103. https://ajindex.com/articles/75257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ABRAHAM, K., (2011). A Study on Consumer Behaviour (With Reference to V.B Factors). International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems ISSN (Online): 2230-8849, 1(2). ALFORD, B. L., ve BISWAS, A. (2002).
  2. The Effects of Discount Level, Price Consciousness and Sale Proneness on Consumers' Price Perception and Behavioral Intention. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 775-783.
  3. ALOOMA, A. G., ve LAWAN, L. A. (2013). Effects of Consumer Demographic Variables on Clothes Buying Behaviour in Borno State, Nigeria. International Journal of Basic And Applied Science, 1(4), 791-799.
  4. BAO, Y., ve MANDRIK, C. A. (2004). Discerning Store Brand Users From Value Consciousness Consumers: The Role Of Prestige Sensitivity and Need For Cognition. Acr North American Advances. 31, 707-712
  5. BARBER, B., ve LOBEL, L. S. (1952). Fashion in Women's Clothes and The American Social System. Social Force, 31, 124-131.
  6. BATRA, R., ve SINHA, I. (2000). Consumer-Level Factors Moderating The Success of Private Label Brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175-191.
  7. BENETON, P. (1991). Toplumsal Sınıflar. (H. Dilli, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  8. BEREDAY GEORGE Z.F. (1977). Social Stratification and Education in Industrial Countries, Comparative Education Review, 21 (2/3), The State of the Art. BLATTBERG, R. C., BRIESCH, R., ve FOX, E. J. (1995). How Promotions Work. Marketing Science, 14 (3), 122-132.
  9. BROWN, J. D. (2009). Statistics Corner. Questions and Answers About Language Testing Statistics: Choosing The Right Number of Components or Factors in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(2), 19-23.
  10. BURTON, S., LICHTENSTEIN, D. R., NETEMEYER, R. G., ve GARRETSON, J. A. (1998). A Scale For Measuring Attitude Toward Private Label Products and An Examination Of Its Psychological and Behavioral Correlates. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293-306.
  11. BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2002). Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 32(32), 470-483.
  12. BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (7. Baskı). Pegem A Yayıncılık. CAMERA, JP. (1971). Study Of W. Lloyd Warner’s Social Classes an Application to Department Store Purchasing in Great Falls and Havre. Graduate Student Theses Dissertations Professional Papers. 8056, www.scholarworks.umt.edu/etd. CARMAN, J. M. (1965). The Application of Social Class in Market Segmentation. Institute of Business and Economic Resear