Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

ÇALIŞMA PAYLAŞIMI İŞSİZLİKLE MÜCADELEDE ETKİLİ BİR POLİTİKA MIDIR?

Pages
59–68
Publication Date
2004-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason work sharing policies have experienced a strong decline in their popularity since the mid 1980’s

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last thirty years most of the European Welfare States have been plauged by mass unemployment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since late 1970’s, labor shedding via early retirement and shorter work hours per worker has seen as major pathways out of employment crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason work sharing policies have experienced a strong decline in their popularity since the mid 1980’s
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the last thirty years most of the European Welfare States have been plauged by mass unemployment. Since late 1970’s, labor shedding via early retirement and shorter work hours per worker has seen as major pathways out of employment crisis. In this study we try to analyse these policies from both theoretical and practical standpoints. According to the findings of empirical studies they do not seem very effective to help to solve unemployment problem. These policies have been progresively criticized because of their large costs and relatively weak impacts on the jobs’ creation. For this reason work sharing policies have experienced a strong decline in their popularity since the mid 1980’s

Özet

Gelişmiş Avrupa ülkelerinin çoğu son 30 yıldan bu yana işsizlik problemi ile karşı karşıyadırlar. Bu ülkelerde emek arzının erken emeklilik ve çalışma sürelerinin kısaltılması yoluyla azaltılması 1970’lerin sonunda itibaren işsizlikle mücadelede izlenilen başlıca yollar olmuştur. Bu makalede “çalışma paylaşımı” olarak isimlendirilen söz konusu politikalar gerek teorik gerekse uygulama açılarından analiz edilerek bunların işsizlikle mücadelede etkin araçlar olup olmadıkları sorgulanmaya çalışılmıştır. Yapılan ampirik gözlemler çalışma paylaşımı politikasının yüksek maliyetlerine karşılık iş yaratma konusunda etkilerinin zayıf olduğunu, dolayısıyla işsizlikle mücadelede etkin bir politika olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu durum 1980’lerin ortalarından itibaren söz konusu politikaların yaygınlığını büyük ölçüde azaltmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

BİÇERLİ, M. K. (2004). ÇALIŞMA PAYLAŞIMI İŞSİZLİKLE MÜCADELEDE ETKİLİ BİR POLİTİKA MIDIR?. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 59–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/752414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. BAKER, Michael ve DWAYNE, Benjamin (1999): “Early Retirement Provision And The Labor Force Behavior of Older Men: Evidence From Canada”, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.17, No.4, Part 1, October, ss. 724-756.
  2. BOSCH, Gerhard ve LEHNDORFF, Steffen (2001): “Working-Time Reduction And Employment: Experiences in Europe and Economic Policy Recommendations”, Cambridge Journal Of Economics, 25, ss. 209-243.
  3. BRUNELLO, Giorgio (1989): “The Employment Effect Of Shorter Working Hours: An Application to Japanese Data”, Economica, November, ss. 473- 486. CASEY, Bernard (1996): “Exit Options from the Labor Force”, Ed. Günther Schmid, Jacqueline O’Reilly ve Klaus Schömann; International Handbook of Labor Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham U.K., 1996, ss.379-401.
  4. CASEY, Bernard ve LACZKO, Frank (1989): “Early Retirement a Long Term Unemployment?: The Situation of Non-Working Men Age 55-64 from 1979 to 1986”,
  5. Work, Employment and Society, Vol.3, No.4, ss.509-526.
  6. CASEY, Bernard ve WOOD Stephen (1994): “Great Britain: Firm Policy, State Policy and the Employment of Older Workers”, Ed. Frieder Naschold ve Bert de Vroom, Regulating Employment and Welfare, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, ss.363-394.
  7. DANKERT, Clyde E. (1962): “Shorter Hours in Theory and Practice”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, April, ss. 307- 322. GRAY, David M. (2002): “Early Retirement Programs and Wage Restraint: Empirical Evidence From France”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, April, Vol. 55, Issue 3, ss.512-533 makalenin EBSCOhost veri tabanından elde edilen nüshası, ss.1-21.
  8. GUILLEMARD, Anne-Marie ve GUNSTEREN, Herman Van (1991): “Pathways and their Prospects: A Comperative Interpretation of the Meaninig of Early Exit”, Ed. Martin Kohli, Martin Rein, Anne-Marie Guillemard ve Herman van Gunsteren, Time For Retirement: Comperative Studies of Early Exit from the Labor Force, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, ss. 362- 387. GUILLEMARD, Anne-Marie (1991): “France: Massive Exit Through Unemployment Compensation”, Ed. Martin Kohli, Martin Rein, Anne-Marie Guillemard ve Herman van Gunsteren, Time For Retirement: Comperative Studies of Early Exit from the Labor Force, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, ss. 127-180.
  9. HUNT, Jennifer ve KATZ, Lawrance F. (1998): “Hours Reduction as Work Sharing”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.1998, No.1, ss. 339-381.
  10. JACOBS, Klaus; KOHLI, Martin ve REIN, Martin (1991): “Germany: The Diversity of Pathways”, Ed. Martin Ko