SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Role of Product Performance on the Effect of Process Integration with Suppliers on Firm Performance

Tedarikçilerle Süreç Entegrasyonunun Firma Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Ürün Performansının Aracı Rolü

Bülent YILDIZ
Ahmet ÇETİNDAŞ
Pages
13–28
Publication Date
2020-05-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was found that process integration had a positive effect on company performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the mediating role of product performance on the effect of the supplier process integration on Firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the moderator effect of market uncertainty on the effect of process integration on firm performance is also analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was found that process integration had a positive effect on company performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarikçi süreç entegrasyonu · Ürün performansı · Piyasa belirsizliği

Abstract

This study investigates the mediating role of product performance on the effect of the supplier process integration on Firm performance. Additionally, the moderator effect of market uncertainty on the effect of process integration on firm performance is also analyzed. For this purpose, data were collected by surveys from 156 manufacturing companies operating in Istanbul. A structural equation model was established and analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was found that process integration had a positive effect on company performance. In addition, it has been determined that product performance has a positive effect on firm performance. The mediation role of product performance on the effect of process integration on firm performance was made by a bootstrap method. The mediating role of product performance could be found but the moderating role of market uncertainty could not be proven.

Özet

Bu çalışmada tedarikçilerle süreç entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde ürün performansının aracılık rolü araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca süreç entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde piyasa belirsizliğinin düzenleyici rolü analiz edilmiştir. Bu amaçla İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren 156 imalat firmasından anket ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında yapısal eşitlik modeli kurularak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda süreç entegrasyonu ve ürün performansının firma performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca ürün performansının da firma performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Süreç entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde ürün performansının aracılık rolü boostrap yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Analiz neticesinde ürün performansının aracılık rolü bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda piyasa belirsizliğinin düzenleyici rolüne ulaşılamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, B., ÇETİNDAŞ, A. (2020). The Mediating Role of Product Performance on the Effect of Process Integration with Suppliers on Firm Performance. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 13–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/75223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Agustin, C. & Singh, J. (2005). Curvilinear effects of consumer loyalty determinants in relational exchanges, Journal of Marketing Research 42;96-108.
  2. Boon-itt, S. & Wong, C.Y. (2011). The moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain ıntegration and customer delivery performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 41(3),253-276.
  3. Bonaccorsi, A. & Lipparini, A. (1994). Strategic partnerships in new product development: an ıtalian case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11:134–145.
  4. Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., ve Roath, A. S. (2009). Defining and operationalizing supply chain process integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 63-84
  5. Danese, P. & Romano, P. (2011). Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4),220-230.
  6. Davenport, T.H. (1993), Process ınnovation–reengineering work through ınformation technology. Harvard Business School Press,
  7. Boston, MA. Ettlie, J.E. & Reza, E., (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal 34, 795–827.
  8. Flynn, B. B., B. Huo, & X. Zhao. (2010). The ımpact of supply chain ıntegration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1),58–71.
  9. Fynes, B., Burca, S. & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10, 179-190.
  10. Frohlich, M. T. & R. Westbrook. 2001. Arcs of integration: An ınternational study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management. 19 (2), 185–200.
  11. Frohlich, M.T. & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An ınternational study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operation Management. 19:185–200.
  12. Gatignon, H. & Xuereb, J.M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research. 34, 77–90.
  13. Gatignon, H. & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.
  14. Jayaram, J. (2008). Supplier involvement in new product development projects: dimensionality and contingency effects”. International Journal of Production Research. 46(13), 3717-3735.
  15. Jaworski, B.J. & Kohli, A.K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing. 57(3