Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

IMPLEMENTATION PROPOSAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT COSTS IN TERMS OF QUALITY COSTS

Pages
933–953
Publication Date
2009-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, costs of operating activities aimed at preventing this type of occupational accidents will be discussed and a number of proposals will be presented in respect to probable prevention costs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Occupational accidents, whether they are work-related or not, are defined as unplanned and unforeseen incidents which cause one or more than one workers to get ill, injured or lose their lifes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increase in occupational accidents in recent years, together with the decrease in productivity and production efficiency, has mooted direct and indirect costs for companies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, costs of operating activities aimed at preventing this type of occupational accidents will be discussed and a number of proposals will be presented in respect to probable prevention costs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Occupational Accidents · Quality Costs

Abstract

Occupational accidents, whether they are work-related or not, are defined as unplanned and unforeseen incidents which cause one or more than one workers to get ill, injured or lose their lifes. The increase in occupational accidents in recent years, together with the decrease in productivity and production efficiency, has mooted direct and indirect costs for companies. Quality costs are the type of costs which arise due to the activities implemented in order to preclude possible flaws, to the planned quality tests,and to flaws that appear during the production or customer delivery processes. Quality costs are classified in British Standards 6143 as follows: (a) Prevention Costs (b) Appraisal Costs (c) Internal Failure Costs (d) External Failure Costs As regards quality costs, occupational accidents that may produce highly excessive costs can be prevented by executing a good number of prevention activities. With the analysis of workflow processes in the established or subsequently established engine park, quality costs of those processes can be measured and evaluated in terms of occupational accidents. Despite prevention costs and appraisal costs, occupational accidents may still continue to appear in companies owing to various reasons. Those accidents may cause cessation in the production flow, or effect defective products. All these costs combined may constitute a considerable amount of internal failure costs. A company, along with internal failure, may have to endure a good number of appraisal costs and indemnities owing to workers’ complaints. In this study the internal and external failure costs caused by a significant industrial accident which occurred during implementation will be appraised. Furthermore, costs of operating activities aimed at preventing this type of occupational accidents will be discussed and a number of proposals will be presented in respect to probable prevention costs.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKÇÜ, S., GÖNEN, S. (2009). IMPLEMENTATION PROPOSAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT COSTS IN TERMS OF QUALITY COSTS. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 933–953. https://ajindex.com/articles/752218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AĞAR, A. (2009), “ĠĢ Kazası ve Meslek Hastalığının; Unsurları, Tanımı ve Bildirim Süreleri”, ĠĢveren Dergisi, 47(4):81-86.
  2. BESTERFIELD, D.; MICHNA, C.; BESTERFIELD, G and SACRE, M. (1995):
  3. Total Quality Management, Prentice Hall, USA. BLAND, M., MAYNARD, J and HERBERT, D. (1998):”Quality Costing of An Administrative Process”, The TQM Magazine, 10(5):367-377. BSI 6143- Part 2: British Standard Institution (1992), Guide to The Economics Of Quality: Prevention, Appraisal and Failure Model, London. ÇABUK, Y. (2005):”Kalite Maliyetleri ve Kalite Maliyetlerini Ölçmeden Kullanılan Yöntemler”, ZKU Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(7):1-8. DALCI, Ġ and TANIġ, V. (2002): “Quality Costs and Their Importance In Cost And Management Accounting”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(10):1134-147. DEMĠRBĠLEK, S and PAZARLIOĞLU, V. (2007): “Türkiye’de ĠĢ Kazalarının OluĢumunda Etkili Olan Faktörler: Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Finans Politik&Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(509):81-91. ESĠN, A. (2007): “ĠĢ Kazalarına DeğiĢik YaklaĢım-DavranıĢsal Güvenlik”, Mühendis ve Makine Dergisi, 48(567):3-9.
  4. FEIGENBAUM, A. (1991):
  5. The Total Quality Control, McGraw-Hill, USA. FERNANDEZ, S, RIOS, I., CAZORLA, A and FALERO, E. (2009), “Pilot Study On The Influence Of Stress Caused By The Need to Combine Work and Family On Occupational Accidents In Working Women”, Safety Science, No.47:192- 198. GOULDEN, C and RAWLINS, L. (1997): “Quality Costing: The Application of The Process Model within a Manufacturing Environment”, International Journal of Operations&Production Management, 17(2):199-210.
  6. HALIS, M and OZTAS, A. (2002): “Quality Cost Analysis in ISO-9000-Certified Turkish Companies”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(1):101-104.
  7. HAMALAINEN, P, TAKALA, J and SAARELA, K. (2006), “Global Estimates Of Occupational Accidents”, Safety Science, No.44:137-156. http://www.oit.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?P155 http://www.sgk.gov.tr/sgkshared/sskdownloads/anasayfa/istatistik/istatistik2006/ 4_2006_ISKAZASI_16_45.xls (17/02/2009) http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/EFD3A0FD-E836-4C13-BA04- 5614011BDE25/0/35definitions.pdf (18/02/2009)
  8. KEOGH, W. (1994): “The Role of the Quality Assurance Professional in Determining Quality Costs”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(4):23-32. KOÇ,T and DEMĠRHAN, O. (2007): “Önleme Ve Değerlendirme Maliyetleri ile Uygunsuzluk Maliyeti Arasındaki ĠliĢkinin Analizi“, Ġstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(11):87-97.
  9. MIGUEL, P and PONTEL, S. (2004): “A