SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

RELATIONSHIP AMONG LEARNING LEVELS: AN INVESTIGATION IN HOTEL COMPANIES

ÖĞRENME DÜZEYLERİ ARASI İLİŞKİ: OTEL İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Umut AVCI
İzzet KILINÇ
Fevzi OKUMUŞ
Pages
95–115
Publication Date
2010-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study findings indicate that there is a meaningful relationship among individual learning, team learning and organizational learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the relationship among individual learning, team learning and organizational learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data was collected from 799 employees, who worked in four and five star hotels operated in Mugla, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study findings indicate that there is a meaningful relationship among individual learning, team learning and organizational learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:bireysel öğrenme · takım öğrenmesi · örgütsel öğrenme

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship among individual learning, team learning and organizational learning. Data was collected from 799 employees, who worked in four and five star hotels operated in Mugla, Turkey. The study findings indicate that there is a meaningful relationship among individual learning, team learning and organizational learning. In particular, team learning appears to explain organizational learning more than individual learning. Based on the study findings, it can be recommended that in order to facilitate organizational learning, hotel organizations should critically analyze and utilize the factors that facilitate team learning

Özet

Bu çalışmada, bireysel öğrenme ile örgütsel öğrenme ve takım öğrenmesi ile örgütsel öğrenme arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırma verileri, Muğla ilinde faaliyet gösteren tüm dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinin 799 çalışanına anket uygulanarak toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, hem bireysel öğrenme ile örgütsel öğrenme arasında hem de takım öğrenmesi ile örgütsel öğrenme arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, takım öğrenmesinin örgütsel öğrenmeyi bireysel öğrenmeden daha kapsamlı açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, otel işletmelerine örgütsel öğrenmeyi başarılı şekilde gerçekleştirmek için takım öğrenmesini sağlayan faktörleri dikkatlice incelemesi ve takım kültürüne yatkın ortamı yaratması önerilebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, U., KILINÇ, İ., OKUMUŞ, F. (2010). RELATIONSHIP AMONG LEARNING LEVELS: AN INVESTIGATION IN HOTEL COMPANIES. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 95–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/752155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Antonacopoulou, P. E. (1998): “Developing learning managers within learning organizations”, (Edt) Easterby-Smith M, Arujo, L., Burgoyne, J., Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice, London: Sage, ss.214-242.
  2. Antonacopoulou, P. E. (2006): “The relationship between individual and organizational learning: New evidence from managerial learning practicies”, Management Learning, 37(4), 455-473.
  3. Argyris, C. (1990): Overcoming organizational defences: Facilitating Organizational Learning, Allyn&Bacon, Boston, M.A. Argyris, C. ve Schön, D. (1978): Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA., USA. Avcı, U. (2005): İşletmelerde Örgütsel Öğrenme-Örgütsel Performans İlişkisi: Konaklama İşletmelerinde Örgütsel Öğrenme-Örgütsel Performans İlişkisine Yönelik İnceleme, SDU Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Isparta. Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Kutanis, R. Ö. (2003): “Transforming hotels into learning organisations: a new strategy for going global”, Tourism Management, 24 (2), 149-154.
  4. Baker, W. E. ve Sinkula, J. M. (1999): “The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), ss.411-427.
  5. Bennet, J. (2001): “The relationship between team and organisational learning”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 14(1), ss.14-20.
  6. Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M. ve Hulland, J. (2002): “Managing an Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows”, Journal of Management Studies, 39(4) June, ss.437-469.
  7. Bunderson, S. J. ve Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003): “Management Team Learning Orientation and Business Unit Performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), ss.552-560.
  8. Calantone, J.C., Cavusgil, T. S. ve Zhao, Y. (2002): “Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), ss.515-524
  9. Chan, C.C.A., Lim, L. ve Keasbeyrry, S. K. (2003): “Examining the linkages between team learning bahviors and team performance”, The Learning Organization, 10(4), ss.228-236.
  10. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D.A. ve Daniel, A. (1990): “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), ss.128-152.
  11. Cook, S. D. N. ve Brown, J. S. (1999): “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Bettween Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing”, Organization Science, 10 (4), ss