SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Foreing Direct Investment on the Unemployment in Turkey: A Bounds Testing Approach

YABANCI DOĞRUDAN YATIRIMLARIN TÜRKİYE’DEKİ İŞSİZLİĞE ETKİSİ: SINIR TESTİ YAKLAŞIMI

Osman PEKER
İsmet GÖÇER
Pages
1187–1194
Publication Date
2010-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the short term analysis although FDI increase unemployment in the current period, evidence is found to decrease after two periods

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this survey, the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the unemployment in Turkey has been studied by a bounds testing approach using the data between 2000:Q1–2009:Q4.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to empirical findings of the survey, in the long term the effect of FDI on unemployment is not statistically significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the short term analysis although FDI increase unemployment in the current period, evidence is found to decrease after two periods
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · yabancı doğrudan yatırımlar · işsizlik

Abstract

In this survey, the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the unemployment in Turkey has been studied by a bounds testing approach using the data between 2000:Q1–2009:Q4. According to empirical findings of the survey, in the long term the effect of FDI on unemployment is not statistically significant. In the short term analysis although FDI increase unemployment in the current period, evidence is found to decrease after two periods

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yabancı doğrudan yatırımların (YDY) Türkiye’de işsizlik üzerindeki etkisi, 2000:Q1–2009:Q4 dönemi verileri kullanılarak; sınır testi yaklaşımıyla araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın ampirik bulgularına göre, uzun dönemde YDY ile işsizlik arasında istatistiki açıdan anlamlı bir ilişki çıkmamıştır. Kısa dönem analizinde ise, YDY’nin işsizliği, cari dönemde arttırmasına rağmen, iki dönem sonra azalttığı bulgusu tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKER, O., GÖÇER, İ. (2010). The Effect of Foreing Direct Investment on the Unemployment in Turkey: A Bounds Testing Approach. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 1187–1194. https://ajindex.com/articles/752095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aktar, I. ve Özturk, L. (2009): “Can Unemployment be Cured by Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in TURKEY?”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 27: 203-211.
  2. Anderson, P. ve Hainaut, P. (1998): “Foreign Direct Investment and Employment in the Industrial Countries”, BIS Working Paper, No. 61. Barrell, R ve Pain, N. (1997): “Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth Within Europe”,The Economic Journal, 107(445): 1770-1786.
  3. Barros, P. P ve Cabrol, L. M. (2000): “Competing For Foreing Direct Investment, Review of International Economics”, 8(2): 360-371.
  4. Borensztein, E., Gregoria, J. D. ve Lee, J. W. (1998): “How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?”, Journal of International Economics, 45(1): 115-138.
  5. Dickey, D. Ve Fuller, W. A. (1979): “Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74: 427-431.
  6. DPT. (2001):
  7. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu: 532, Ankara.
  8. Enders, W. (1995): Applied Econometric Time Series, 1 rd edition, Wiley, New York. Enders, W. (1996): Rats Handbook for Econometric Time Series, John Willey and Song Inc. Engle, R. ve Granger, C. W. J. (1987): “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Represention, estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2): 251 – 276. Fung, M. K., Zeng, J. ve Zhu, L. (1999): “Foreign Capital, Urban Unemployment, and Economic Growth”, Review of International Economics, 7(4): 651- 664. Granger, C. W. J. ve NEWBOLD, P. (1974): “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2): 111-120.
  9. Gujarati, D, N. (1999):
  10. Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw Hill, Literatür Yayıncılık, 3 rd edition, İstanbul.
  11. Hunya, G. ve Geishecker, I. (2005): “Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe”, Research Reports, No. 321. Javorcik, B. S. (2004): “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages”, The American Economic Review, 94(3): 605- 627. Jayaraman, T. K. (1998). “Foreign Direct Investment as An Alternative to Foreign Aid to South Pacific Island Countries”, Journal of the South Pacific Society, 21(3-4): 29-44.
  12. Jayaraman, T. K. ve Singh, B. (2007): “Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Employment in Pacific Island Countries: An Emprical Study of Fiji”, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade W