Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Factors Affecting The Performance of The Turkish Commercial Banks

Türkiye’de Ticari Bankaların Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler

Pages
289–298
Publication Date
2011-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, bank performance is mostly affected by bank-specific factors and macro economic factors do not have statistically significant effects on the performance. 2001 crisis have a negative effect on the performance, pointing to the effect of stability of the economy on the performance of the banking system

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this paper is to analyze the macroeconomic and bank specific determinants of bank performance in Turkish banking industry between the years 1995 and 2009.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Performance factors adopted are return on assets, return on equity and net interest margin and panel data regression analysis is applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, bank performance is mostly affected by bank-specific factors and macro economic factors do not have statistically significant effects on the performance. 2001 crisis have a negative effect on the performance, pointing to the effect of stability of the economy on the performance of the banking system
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banka performansı · ticari bankalar · panel veri analizi

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the macroeconomic and bank specific determinants of bank performance in Turkish banking industry between the years 1995 and 2009. Performance factors adopted are return on assets, return on equity and net interest margin and panel data regression analysis is applied. According to the results, bank performance is mostly affected by bank-specific factors and macro economic factors do not have statistically significant effects on the performance. 2001 crisis have a negative effect on the performance, pointing to the effect of stability of the economy on the performance of the banking system

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye’de 1995-2009 yılları arasında faaliyet gösteren ticari bankaların performanslarını etkileyen içsel ve dışsal faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Yöntem olarak panel veri analizi kullanılmış, performans ölçütü olarak aktif karlılığı, net faiz marjı ve özkaynak karlılığı göz önüne alınmıştır. Sonuçlar bankacılık performansının daha çok mikro değişkenlerden etkilendiğini, ve makroekonomik faktörlerin anlamlı düzeyde bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir. 2001 krizinin genel olarak negatif etkisinin olması da ekonominin genel olarak istikrarlı durumda olmasının banka performansını etkilediğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIN, F. D. (2011). The Factors Affecting The Performance of The Turkish Commercial Banks. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 289–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/752080

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abreau, M. ve Mendes, M. (2002) “Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability: Evidence from EU Countries” University of Porto Working Paper Series, 122. Allen, L. (1988) “The Determinants of Bank Interest Margins: A Note” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 23: 231-235.
  2. Angbazo, L. (1997) “Commercial Bank Net İnterest Margins, Default Risk, Interest-Rate Risk, and Off-Balance Sheet Banking” Journal of Banking & Finance. 21: 55-87.
  3. Athanasoglou, P.P., Brissimis, S. N. ve Delis, M.D. (2008) “Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic De- terminants of Bank Profitability” Journal of International Fi- nancial Markets, Institutions & Money, 18: 121-136.
  4. Berger, A. (1995) “The Profit-Structure Relationship in Ban- king – Tests of Market Power and Efficient Structure Hypot- heses” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27: 401-431. Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurulu (BDDK), Yıllık Rapor 2001.
  5. Boyd, J. H. ve Runkle, D. E. (1993) “Size and Performance of Banking Firms: Testing the Predictions of Theory” Journal of Monetary Economics, 31: 47-67.
  6. Çingi S. ve Tarım, A. (2000) “Türk Banka Sisteminde Perfor- mans Ölçümü: DEA-Malmquist TFP Endeksi Uygulaması” Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Araştırma Tebliğleri Serisi 1. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. ve Huizinga, H. (1999) “Determinants of Commercial Bank İnterest Margins and Profitability: Some International Evidence” The World Bank Economic Review, 13: 379-408.
  7. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. ve Huizinga, H. (2000) “Financial Struc- ture and Bank Profitability” World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 2430. Drakos, K. (2003) “Assessing the Success of Reform in Transi- tion Banking 10 Years Later: An Interest Margin Analysis” Journal of Policy Modeling, 25: 309-317.
  8. Gerlach, S., Peng, W. ve Shu, C. Bank for International Sett- lements Papers, 22. www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap22x.pdf. Guru, B.K., Staunton, J. ve Balashanmugam, B. (1999) “De- terminants of Commercial Bank Profitability in Malaysia” 12th Australian Annual Finance & Banking Conference, Sidney. Hawtrey, K. and Liang, H. (2008) “Bank Interest Margins in OECD Countries” North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 19: 249-260.
  9. Ho, T.S.Y., ve Saunders, A. (1981) “The Determinants of Bank Interest Margins: Theory and Empirical Evidence” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis. 16: 581-600.
  10. Jiang, G., Tang N., Law, E. ve Sze, A. (2003) “Determinants of Bank Profitability in Hong Kong” Hong Kong Monetary Authority Research Memorandum. http://www.info.gov.hk