Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of the Ef f iciency Determinants of Turkey’s Agriculture Sector by Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

Türk Tarımının Etkinlik Bileşenlerinin İki Aşamalı Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile İncelenmesi

Pages
21–28
Publication Date
2013-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, regional efficiency differences were observed and results were evaluated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the country-wide providing the efficiency will only be provided by distributing the resources in the non-efficient provinces and regions well-balanced by correcting the deficiencies and by building separate plans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the efficiency of Turkey’s agriculture sector in 2009 on the basis of provinces and regions by using two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) method is analyzed, the factors that have an impact on productivity are determined and the differences between provinces and regions are focused on.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, regional efficiency differences were observed and results were evaluated
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tarım · teknik etkinlik · tobit regresyon

Abstract

In the country-wide providing the efficiency will only be provided by distributing the resources in the non-efficient provinces and regions well-balanced by correcting the deficiencies and by building separate plans. For this purpose, the efficiency of Turkey’s agriculture sector in 2009 on the basis of provinces and regions by using two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) method is analyzed, the factors that have an impact on productivity are determined and the differences between provinces and regions are focused on. Firstly, an input-oriented DEA was performed by using 4 inputs and 1 output under variable returns to scale assumption. While the average technical efficiency was found to be 75%, it was understood that the cost of agricultural labour force and energy needed to be reduced. Secondly, the Tobit regression model was used to analyse the relation between the technical efficiency values of the provinces and the variables considered to have an external impact on the agricultural productivity. As a result of the predicted model; precipitation per m2, the households engaged in agriculture, literacy ratio and ratio of asphalt roads were determined as variables which contribute the agricultural efficiency of the provinces. Furthermore, regional efficiency differences were observed and results were evaluated

Özet

Ülke genelinde etkinliğin sağlanabilmesi ancak verimsiz olan iller ve bölgelerdeki kaynakların dengeli dağıtılarak, yetersizliklerin giderilmesi ve her biri için ayrı planlamaların yapılması ile mümkün olabilecektir. Bu amaçla, makalede, iki aşamalı veri zarflama analizi (VZA) yöntemi ile 2009 yılı Türk tarım sektörü etkinliği iller ve bölgeler bazında analiz edilmiş, verimliliğe etki eden faktörler belirlenmiş ve bölgeler arasındaki farklılıklara odaklanılmıştır. İlk olarak, ölçeğe göre değişken getiri varsayımı altında 4 girdi, 1 çıktı kullanılarak girdi odaklı veri zarflama analizi yapılmıştır. İllerin ortalama teknik etkinliği %75 bulunurken, tarımsal işgücü ve tarımsal elektrik kullanımı girdilerinin azaltılması gereği ortaya çıkmıştır. İkinci olarak ise Tobit Regresyon modeli kullanılarak, illerin teknik etkinlik değerleri ile tarımsal verimliliği dışsal olarak etkileyen değişkenler arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Kestirilen model sonucunda; m2’ye düşen yağış miktarı, tarımla uğraşan hane halkı, okur yazar ve asfalt yol oranı illerin tarımsal verimliliğine katkıda bulunan değişkenler olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, bölgesel etkinlik farklılıkları incelenerek sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAN, H. E., SAMUT, P. K. (2013). Analysis of the Ef f iciency Determinants of Turkey’s Agriculture Sector by Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 21–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/752041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Armağan, G., Özden, A. ve Bekçioğlu, S. (2010) “Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity of Crop Production at NUTS1 Level in Turkey: Malmquist Index Approach” Quality&Quantity, 44:573- 581. Artukoğlu, M.M., Olgun, A. ve Adanacıoğlu, H. (2010) “The Efficiency Analysis of Organic and Conventional Olive Farms: Case of Turkey” Agricultural Economics-Czech, 56(2):89-96.
  2. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. ve Cooper, W.W. (1984) “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis” Management Science, 30(9):1078-1092.
  3. Barros, C.P. (2006) “Efficiency Measurement among Hypermarkets and Supermarkets and The Identification of The Efficiency Drivers” International Journal of Retail&Distribution Management, 34(2):135-154.
  4. Başarır, A., Karlı, B. ve Bilgiç, A. (2006) “An Evaluation of Turkish Agricultural Production Performance” International Journal of Agriculture&Biology, 8(4):511-515.
  5. Binam, J.N., Sylla, K., Diarra, I. ve Nyambi, G. (2003) “Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency among Coffee Farmers in Cote d’Ivoıre: Evidence from The Centre West Region” R&D Management, 15(1):66-76.
  6. Bozoğlu, M. ve Ceyhan, V. (2007) “Measuring The Technical Efficiency and Exploring The İnefficiency Determinants of Vegetable Farms in Samsun Province, Turkey” Agricultural Systems, 94:649-656.
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. ve Rhodes, E. (1978) “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units” European Journal of Operational Research, 2:429-444.
  8. Chavas, J-P. ve Aliber, M. (1993) “An Analysis of Economic Efficiency in Agriculture: A Nonparametric Approach” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18(1):1-16.
  9. Coelli, T.J. (1996) “A guide to DEAP version 2.0: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program” Center for Efficiency and Productive Analysis (CEPA) Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. Coelli, T., Rahman, S. ve Thirtle, C. (2002) “Technical, Allocative, Cost and Scale Efficiencies in Bnagladesh Rice Cultivation: A Non-Parametric Approach” Journal of Economic Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53:607-626.
  10. Çakmak, E., Dudu, H. ve Öcal, N. (2008) “Türk Tarım Sektöründe Etkinlik:Yöntem ve Hanehalkı Düzeyinde Nicel Analiz” Report prepared for Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey, Ankara.
  11. Deliktaş, E. ve Candemir, M. (2007) “Production Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Turkish State Agricultural Enterprises” Ege University, Working Papers in Economics, No:03. FAO, Food and Agriculture. Orga