SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Efficient Pricing Model for The Warrants Listed on The ISE

İMKB’de İşlem Gören Aracı Kuruluş Varantları İçin Etkin Fiyatlama Modelinin Belirlenmesi

Rıfat KARAKUŞ
İsrafil ZOR
Pages
63–71
Publication Date
2014-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, BlackScholes-Merton model is the most efficient model for in-themoney warrants, but it is not possible to choose one of the models that are Black-Scholes and Black-Scholes-Merton for at-the-money and out-of-money warrants

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to determine the efficient pricing model for the warrants traded on the ISE.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By using more than 3.000 observations about the call warrants that’s underlying security is ISE-30 Index and traded in 2012, Black-Scholes, BlackScholes-Merton, Square Root Constant Elasticity Variance and Binomial models are tested according to difference between model and market prices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, BlackScholes-Merton model is the most efficient model for in-themoney warrants, but it is not possible to choose one of the models that are Black-Scholes and Black-Scholes-Merton for at-the-money and out-of-money warrants
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Varant · opsiyon fiyatlama modelleri · İMKB

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the efficient pricing model for the warrants traded on the ISE. By using more than 3.000 observations about the call warrants that’s underlying security is ISE-30 Index and traded in 2012, Black-Scholes, BlackScholes-Merton, Square Root Constant Elasticity Variance and Binomial models are tested according to difference between model and market prices. Also independent t test is used to explain the statistical efficiency of differences between model and market prices for warrants that are grouped according to their moneyness degree. As a result of the study, BlackScholes-Merton model is the most efficient model for in-themoney warrants, but it is not possible to choose one of the models that are Black-Scholes and Black-Scholes-Merton for at-the-money and out-of-money warrants

Özet

Bu çalışmada, İMKB’de işlem gören aracı kuruluş varantları için hangi fiyatlama modelinin etkin olduğunun belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. 2012 yılında işlem gören, İMKB-30 endeksine dayalı 61 alım varantına ait 3,000’den fazla gözlem kullanılarak Black-Scholes, Black-Scholes-Merton, Varyansın Sabit Esnekliği (Karekök Modeli) ve Binomial modeller ile hesaplanan günlük varant fiyatlarının piyasa fiyatından farklılaşmaları dikkate alınarak test edilmiştir. Karda/zararda olma durumlarına göre 3 gruba ayrılan varantlar için modellerden elde edilen fiyatlar ile piyasa fiyatlarının istatistiksel olarak farklılaşması bağımsız t testi kullanılarak tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda karda olan varantlar için Black-Scholes-Merton modeli etkin model olarak belirlenirken, başabaş ve zararda olan varantlar için Black-Scholes modeli ile Black-Scholes-Merton modelleri arasında kararsız kalınmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKUŞ, R., ZOR, İ. (2014). Determination of Efficient Pricing Model for The Warrants Listed on The ISE. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 63–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/752022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Barone-Adesi, G. ve Whaley, R.E. (1987) “Efficient Analytic Approximation of American Option Values” The Journal of Finance, 42(2):301-320.
  2. Beckers, S. (1980) “The Constant Elasticity of Variance Model and Its Implications For Option Pricing” The Journal of Finance, 35(3):661-673.
  3. Bjerksund, P., Stensland, G. (1993) “Closed-Form Approximation of American Options” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 9(1):87-99.
  4. Black, F. ve Scholes, M.S. (1973) “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities” Journal of Political Economy, 81(3):637-654.
  5. Boonchuaymetta, E. ve Kongtoranin, T. (2007) “Warrant Pricing Model: An Empirical Study on the Valuation Models for Warrants Listed in Thailand” AU Journal of Management, 5(2):56-66.
  6. Chen, K.C., Shahrokhi, M. ve Wilson, J. (1997) “Pricing Financial Times-Stock Exchange Index Warrants” American Business Review, 22(2): 44-51.
  7. Corrado, C.J. ve Su, T. (1996) “S&P 500 INDEX Option Tests of Jarrow and Rudd’s Approximate Option Valuation” The Journal of Futures Markets, 16(6): 611- 629. Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. ve Rubinstein, M. (1979) “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach” Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3):229-263.
  8. Frino, A., Khan, E. ve Lodh, S.C. (1991) “The Black Scholes Call Option Pricing Model and the Australian Options Market: Where Are We After 15 Years” University of Wollongong, Accounting & Finance Working Paper, No:91/24. Galai, D., Schneller, M.I. (1978) “Pricing of Warrants and The Value of The Firm” The Journal of Finance, 33(5):1333-1342.
  9. Geske, R. (1979) “The valuation of compound options” Journal of Financial Economics, 7(1):63-81.
  10. Hauser, S., Lauterbach, B. (1997) “The Relative Performance of Five Alternative Warrant Pricing Models” Financial Analysts Journal, 53(1):55-61.
  11. Jianfeng, Z., Wenxiu, H. ve Li, Z. (2011) “The Relative Performance of Four Alternative Warrant Pricing Models: A Study of the Chinese Warrant Markets” System Science Engineering Design and Manufacturing Informatization (ICSEM), International Conference, 22-23
  12. October. Khelifa, Z.B. ve Abbassi, W. (2009) “Pricing Warrants Models: An Empirical Study of The Indonesian Market” 5ème Conférence Internationale de Finance, 12-13-14
  13. March, Hammamet, Tunisie. Kremer, J.W. ve Roenfeldt, R.L. (1993) “Warrant Pricing: Jump-Diffusion vs. Black-Scholes” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(2):255-272.
  14. Kolb, R.W. (1995)
  15. Understanding Options, USA, Wiley. Kuwahara, H. ve Marsh, T.A. (1992) “The Pricing of Japanese Equity Warrants” Manageme