Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The Interaction of Mutual Fund Flows and Stock Returns: Evidence From The Turkish Capital Market

Yatırım Fonları ile Hisse Senedi Piyasasının Etkileşimi: Türk Sermaye Piyasasından Bulgular

Pages
163–174
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the empirical findings will prove to be extremely useful information for investors who need to understand these dynamic interactions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The substantial growth and popularity of mutual funds as an investment tool has risen the need for an understanding of the significant implications for the financial markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper examines the dynamic interaction between mutual fund flows and stock returns for an emerging capital market, namely Turkey and more specifically, analyzes the possibility of a causal mechanism whether mutual fund flows influence stock returns and vice versa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the empirical findings will prove to be extremely useful information for investors who need to understand these dynamic interactions
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yatırım fonları · hisse senedi piyasası · nedensellik

Abstract

The substantial growth and popularity of mutual funds as an investment tool has risen the need for an understanding of the significant implications for the financial markets. This paper examines the dynamic interaction between mutual fund flows and stock returns for an emerging capital market, namely Turkey and more specifically, analyzes the possibility of a causal mechanism whether mutual fund flows influence stock returns and vice versa. Long run dynamic relationship is examined by using cointegration tests, short-run dynamic causal relationship through vector error correction model. The results of cointegration test show that there is cointegrating relationship among each category of mutual fund flows and stock index. Moreover, the statistical evidence indicates that there is bidirectional causality between all categories of mutual fund flows and stock returns. Thus, the empirical findings will prove to be extremely useful information for investors who need to understand these dynamic interactions

Özet

Günümüzde büyüklüğü ve popülerliği hızla artan yatırım fonlarının finansal piyasalar üzerindeki etkilerini anlamak yatırımcılar için oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki yatırım fonları ile hisse senetleri arasındaki uzun ve kısa dönemli dinamik ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Seriler arasındaki uzun dönemli dinamik ilişki standart eşbütünleşme testleri ile kısa dönemli nedensellik ilişkisi ise Vektör Hata Düzeltme Modeli (VECM) kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgular, tüm yatırım fonu tipleri ile hisse senedi getirileri arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Vektör Hata Düzeltme Modeli kullanılarak yapılan Granger nedensellik testleri, tüm yatırım fonu tipleri ile hisse senedi getirileri arasında kısa dönemde çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, B., VARDAR, G., TUNÇ, G. (2014). The Interaction of Mutual Fund Flows and Stock Returns: Evidence From The Turkish Capital Market. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 163–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/752013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alexakis, C., Niarchos, N., Patra, T. ve Poshak- wale, S. (2005) “The Dynamics between Stock Returns and Mutual Fund Flows: Empirical Evidence from the Greek Market” International Review of Financial Analysis, 14(5):559-569.
  2. Boyer, B. ve Lu, Z. (2004) “Who Moves the Market? A Study of Stock Prices and Sector Cash Flows” Working Paper Series. Busse J.A. (2001) “Another Look at Mutual Fund Tournaments” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Anal- ysis, 36(1):53-73.
  3. Capital Markets Board of Turkey (2011)
  4. Annual Re- port, Ankara.
  5. Caporale, G.M., Phillipas, N. ve Pitis, N. (2004) “Feedbacks between Mutual Fund Flows and Security Re- turns: Evidence from the Greek Capital Market” Applied Financial Economics, 14:981-989.
  6. Cha, H.J. ve Lee, B.S. (2001) “The Market Demand Curve for Common Stocks: Evidence From Equity Mu- tual Fund Flows” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36:195-220.
  7. Chevalier, J. ve Ellison, G. (1997) “Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives” Journal of Po- litical Economy, 114:389-432.
  8. Davidson, W.N. ve Dutia, D. (1989) “A Note on the Behavior of Security Returns: A Test of Stock Mar- ket Overreaction and Efficiency” Journal of Financial Re- search, 12(3):245-252.
  9. Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1979) “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74:427-431.
  10. Edelen, R. ve Warner, J. (2001) “Aggregate Price Ef- fects of Institutional Trading: A Study of Mutual Fund Flow and Market Returns” Journal of Financial Econom- ics, 59:195-220.
  11. Edwards, F. ve Zhang, X. (1998) “Mutual Funds and Stock and Bond Market Stability” Journal of Financia1 Services Research, 13:257-282.
  12. Engle, R. ve Granger, C.W.S. (1987) “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation Estimation and Testing” Econometrica, 55:251-276.
  13. Fortune, P. (1998) “Mutual Funds, Part II: Fund Flows and Security Returns” New England Economic Re- view, 3-22.
  14. Granger, C.W. (1969) “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Methods and Cross Spectral” Economet- rica, 37:24-36.
  15. Harris, L. ve Gurel, E. (1986) “Price and Volume Ef- fects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 List: New Evidence for the Existence of Price Pressures” Journal of Finance, 41:815-829.
  16. Hendricks, D., Patel, J. ve Zeckhauser, R. (1993) “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance 1974–88” Journal of Finance, 48(1):93-130.
  17. Özlale, Ü. ve İmisiker S. (2008) “Assessing Selectivity and M