Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

The Impact of Ownership Concentration on Dividend Payout Policy: Evidence From Turkey

Sahiplik Yoğunlaşmasının Temettü Dağıtım Kararlarına Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Bir Uygulama

Pages
509–522
Publication Date
2015-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that there is a positive relationship between ownership concentration and dividend yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we investigated the effect of ownership concentration on dividend payout decision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, by using Random Effect Tobit Model and System Generalized Method of Moments approach we utilized the data of 116 industrial companies that are listed on the Borsa Istanbul for the period 2004-2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that there is a positive relationship between ownership concentration and dividend yield.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Temettü Politikası · Sahiplik Yoğunlaşması · Dividend Policy

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of ownership concentration on dividend payout decision. To this end, by using Random Effect Tobit Model and System Generalized Method of Moments approach we utilized the data of 116 industrial companies that are listed on the Borsa Istanbul for the period 2004-2009. The results suggest that there is a positive relationship between ownership concentration and dividend yield. In addition to concentration, firms’ profitability, leverage degree, capital expenditures and market to book value ratio also have significant impact on the dividend decision. Only considering profit distributing firms, concentration level dummy variables, profitability, market value and investment variables seems to determine the dividend rate for the company. When we divide this sample into two subgroups according to asset growth rates of the firms, dividend decisions of slow growing firms are affected by return on asset, market to book ratio as well as ownership concentration. On the other hand, ownership concentration, profitability, capital expenditures and market value are important factors for the dividend payout decisions of fast growing companies

Özet

Bu çalışmada sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının temettü dağıtım kararları üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Rassal Etkili Tobit ve Sistem Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Metodunun kullanıldığı çalışmada, Borsa İstanbul’a kote 116 sanayi şirketinin 20042009 dönemi verilerinden faydalanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının temettü verimini pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca firmaların karlılık oranı, borçlanma düzeyi, yatırım harcamaları ve Piyasa Değeri/Defter Değeri oranının temettü dağıtım kararları üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sadece kar dağıtan firmalar göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, yoğunlaşma düzeyini temsil eden tüm kukla değişkenler ile karlılık, piyasa değeri ve yatırım değişkenlerinin firmaların kar dağıtım oranlarını belirlediği görülmektedir. Kar dağıtan firmalardan oluşan örneklem, düşük ve yüksek hızda büyüyen firmalar şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldığında, düşük hızda büyüyen firmaların temettü dağıtım kararlarında sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının herhangi bir etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür. Hızlı büyüyen firmalarda ise temettü dağıtım kararlarının sahiplik yoğunlaşması, karlılık, piyasa değeri ve yatırım harcamaları tarafından belirlendiği ortaya konulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, E., ÇETENAK, E. H. (2015). The Impact of Ownership Concentration on Dividend Payout Policy: Evidence From Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 509–522. https://ajindex.com/articles/751986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdullah, N.M.H., Ahmad, Z. ve Roslan, S. (2012) “The Influence of Ownership Structure on the Firms Dividend Policy Based Lintner Model” International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(6): 71-88.
  2. Ahmed, H. ve Javid, A.Y. (2009) “The Determinants of Dividend Policy in Pakistan” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 29: 110-125.
  3. Al-Shubiri, F.N., Al Taleb, G. ve Al-Zoued, A.A. (2012) “The Relationship between Ownership Structure and Dividend Policy: An Empirical Investigation” Review of International Comparative Management, 13(4): 644-657.
  4. Arellano, M. ve Bond, S. (1991) “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations” The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297.
  5. Arellano, M. ve Bover, O. (1995) “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models” Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 29-51.
  6. Baltagi, B.H. (2001) “Econometric Analysis of Panel Data” John Wiley and Sons Inc. UK, Chichester. Berle, A.A. ve Means, G. C. (1932). “The Modern Corporation and Private Property” New York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Macmillan. Black, F. (1976) “The Dividend Puzzle” Journal of Portfolio Management, 2(2): 115-143. Bøhren, Ø., Josefsen, M.G. ve Steen, P.E. (2012) “Stakeholder Conflicts and Dividend Policy” Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(10): 2852-2864.
  7. Bradford, W., Chen, C. ve Zhu, S. (2013) “Cash Dividend Policy, Corporate Pyramids, and Ownership Structure: Evidence from China” International Review of Economics and Finance, 27: 445-464.
  8. Chen, Z., Cheung, Y., Stouraitis, A. ve Wong, A.W. (2005) “Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13: 431-449.
  9. Demsetz, H. (1983) “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm” Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 375-390.
  10. Demsetz, H. ve Lehn, K. (1985) “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences” Journal of Political Economy, 93(6): 1155-1177.
  11. Easterbrook, F.H. (1984) “Two Agency Cost Explanations of Dividends” The American Economic Review, 74(4): 650-659.
  12. Faccio, M., Lang, L.H. ve Young, L. (2001) “Dividend and Expropriation” The American Economic Review, 91(1): 54-78.
  13. Fama, E.F. ve French, K.R. (2002) “Testing TradeOff and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt” The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1): 1-33.
  14. Farinha, J. (2003) “Dividend Policy, Corporate Governance and the Managerial Entrenchment Hypothesis: An Emp