In conclusion; it was found that savinginvestment deficit of countries affects their economic growth negatively.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between savinginvestment gap and economic growth in India, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa was analyzed via a new generation time series analysis method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In conclusion; it was found that savinginvestment deficit of countries affects their economic growth negatively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Error correction mechanisms of models are working
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tasarruf-Yatırım Açığı Ekonomik Büyüme · Kırılgan Beşli. · Saving-Investment Gap
Abstract
In this study, the relationship between savinginvestment gap and economic growth in India, Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey and South Africa was analyzed via a new generation time series analysis method. In conclusion; it was found that savinginvestment deficit of countries affects their economic growth negatively. Error correction mechanisms of models are working
Özet
Bu çalışmada; Hindistan, Brezilya, Endonezya, Türkiye ve Güney Afrika’da tasarruf- yatırım açığı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki, yeni nesil zaman serisi yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda; tasarruf-yatırım açığının, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümeleri negatif etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Modellerin hata düzeltme mekanizmaları çalışmaktadır
GÖÇER, İ., AKIN, T. (2016). The Effects of Saving-Investment Gap on Economic Growth in the Fragile Five: A New Generation Econometric Analysis. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 197–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/751968
Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P (1992) “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction” Econometrica, 60(2): 351. Ahmed, S. ve Zlate, A. (2014) “Capital Flows to Emerging Market Economies: A Brave New World?” Journal of International Money and Finance, 48, 221- Aizenman, J., Binici, M. ve Hutchison, M. M. (2014) “The Transmission of Federal Reserve Tapering News to Emerging Financial Markets” National Bureau of Economic Research (No. w19980). Bacha, E. L. (1990) “A Three-Gap Model of Foreign Transfers and The GDP Growth Rate in Developing Countries” Journal of Development economics, 32(2): 296. Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (1998) “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes” Econometrica, 66(1): 47-78.
Banerjee, A., H. (1992) “Recursive and Sequential Tests of The Unit Root and Trend Break Hypotheses: Theory and International Evidence” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 271–288. ve by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods” Econometrica, 37(3): 424–438.
Bernanke, B. S. (2005) “ The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit” Homer Jones Lecture, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2005. http://www.federalreserve. gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/20050414/default. htm Buiter, W. H. (1981) “Time Preference and International Lending and Borrowing in an Overlapping- Generations Model” Journal of Political Economy, 89: 797. Cass, D. (1965) “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation” The Review of economic studies: 233-240.
CEBR (2014). World Economic League Table 2015
Highlights, December 26,2014. http://www.cebr. com/reports/world-economic-league-table-2015/.
Cheung, C., Furceri, D. ve Rusticelli, E. (2013) “Structural and Cyclical Factors Behind Current Account Balances” Review of International Economics, 21(5): 944. Cullison, W. E. (1993) “Saving Measures as Economic Growth Indicators” Contemporary Economic Policy, 11 (1): 1-8.
Deaton, A. ve Paxson, C. (2000) “Growth and Saving among Individuals and Households” Economics and Statistics, 82(2): 212-225.
Review of De Gregorio, J. (1992) “Economic Growth in Latin America” Journal of development economics, 39(1): 84. Eğilmez, M. (2013) “Kırılgan Beşli”, http://www. mahfiegilmez.com/2013/11/krlgan-besli.html (05.04.2015)
Feyrer, J. ve Shambaugh, J. (2012) “Global Savings and Global Investment: The Transmission of Identified Fiscal Shocks” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, 4(2): 95-114.