SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 Özel Sayı

A Bi-Level Mathematical Model Proposal for Procurement Process of Liquid Good in Competitive Environment

Rekabet Ortamında Akışkan Mal Satın Alma Süreci için İki Seviyeli Matematiksel Model Önerisi

Gökhan ÖZÇELİK
Cevriye Temel GENCER
Pages
85–92
Publication Date
2016-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this problem transforming the structure of supply chain into minimum cost flow network, a bi-level mathematical model is proposed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Modeling of the competitive decision making process between two players which have opposite objectives is defined as “Network Interdiction Problem” in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, procurement process in which two competitive firms procure liquid good from the same set of the suppliers is handled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this problem transforming the structure of supply chain into minimum cost flow network, a bi-level mathematical model is proposed
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Minimum maliyetli akış şebekesi · rekabetçi satın alma süreci · şebeke engelleme problemi

Abstract

Modeling of the competitive decision making process between two players which have opposite objectives is defined as “Network Interdiction Problem” in the literature. In this study, procurement process in which two competitive firms procure liquid good from the same set of the suppliers is handled. This process is designed as a network interdiction problem for competition environment in which one of the firms tries to procure goods with minimum cost, the other one tries to maximize the procurement cost of the competitor with owned interdiction budget, as well. In this problem transforming the structure of supply chain into minimum cost flow network, a bi-level mathematical model is proposed

Özet

Literatürde zıt amaçları olan iki taraf arasındaki rekabetçi karar verme sürecinin modellenmesi “Şebeke Engelleme Problemi” olarak ifade edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada aynı tedarikçi kümesini kullanan rekabetçi iki firmanın akışkan mal satın alma süreci ele alınmıştır. Bu süreç, firmalardan birinin minimum maliyetle mal tedarik etmeye çalıştığı, diğerinin ise sahip olduğu engelleme bütçesi ile rakibinin minimum satın alma maliyetini en büyüklemeye çalıştığı bir rekabet ortamı için şebeke engelleme problemi şeklinde tasarlanmıştır. Bu problemdeki tedarik zinciri yapısı minimum maliyetli akış şebekesine dönüştürülerek, iki seviyeli (bi-level) matematiksel bir model önerilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, G., GENCER, C. T. (2016). A Bi-Level Mathematical Model Proposal for Procurement Process of Liquid Good in Competitive Environment. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Özel Sayı, 85–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/751948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akgün, İ., Tansel, B.Ç. ve Wood, R.K. (2011) “The Multi-Terminal Maximum-Flow Network-Interdiction Problem” European Journal of Operational Research, 211(2), 241-251.
  2. Ball, M.O., Golden, B.L. ve Vohra, R.V. (1989) “Finding the Most Vital Arcs in a Network” Operations Research Letters, 8(2), 73-76.
  3. Bayrak, H. ve Matthew D. Bailey, M.D. (2008) “Shortest Path Network Interdiction with Asymmetric Information” Networks, 52(3), 133-140.
  4. Borrero, J.S., Prokopyev, O.A. ve Sauré, D. (2016) “Sequential Shortest Path Interdiction with Incomplete Information” Decision Analysis, 13(1), 68-98.
  5. Corley, H. ve Chang, H. (1974) “Finding the n Most Vital Nodes in a Flow Network” Manage Science, 21, 362-364.
  6. Corley, H. ve David, Y.S. (1982) “Most Vital Links and Nodes in Weighted Networks” Operations Research Letters, 1(4), 157-160.
  7. Cormican, K.J., Morton, D.P. ve Wood, R.K. (1998) “Stochastic Network Interdiction” Operations Research, 46(2), 184-197.
  8. Fulkerson, D.R. ve Harding, G.C. (1977) “Maximiz- ing the Minimum Source-Sink Path Subject to a Budget Constraint” Mathematical Programming, 13(1), 116-118.
  9. Golden, B. (1978) “A Problem in Network Interdic- tion” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 25(4), 711-713.
  10. Granata, D., Steeger, G. ve Rebennack, S. (2013) “Network Interdiction via a Critical Disruption Path: Branch-and-Price Algorithms” Computers & Operations Research, 40(11), 2689-2702.
  11. Gutfraind, A., Hagberg, A.A., Izraelevitz, D. ve Pan, F. (2010) “Interdiction of a Markovian Evader” Paper presented at the INFORMS Computing Society Confer- ence. Israeli, E. ve Wood, R.K. (2002) “Shortest‐Path Net- work Interdiction” Networks, 40(2), 97-111.
  12. Janjarassuk, U. ve Nakrachata-Amon, T. (2016) “A Simulated Annealing Algorithm to the Stochastic Network Interdiction Problem” Paper presented at the IEEE In- ternational Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Keshavarzi, R. ve Fathabadi, H.S. (2015) “Multi-Commodity Multi-Source-Sinks Network Flow Interdiction Problem with Several Interdictors” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(6), 118-122.
  13. Khachiyan, L., Boros, E., Borys, K., Elbassioni, K., Gurvich, V., Rudolf, G. ve Zhao, J. (2007) “On Short Paths Interdiction Problems: Total and Node-Wise Lim- ited Interdiction” Theory of Computing Systems, 43(2), 204-233.
  14. Lim, C. ve Smith, J.C. (2007) “Algorithms for Dis- crete And Continuous Multicommodity Flow Network Interdiction Problems” IIE Transactions, 39(1), 15-26.
  15. Lubore, S., Ratliff, H. ve Sic