Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT OF SELECTED TECHNOPARKS WITH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA)

Pages
155–168
Publication Date
2022-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The efficiency of the technoparks was measured with CCR Input and Output Oriented Models, the issues deemed to increase the benefits provided by the technoparks are evaluated, and suggestions are made within the scope of the findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technology Development Zone (Technopark) are units that focuses on working effectively and producing productive works due to their structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper includes 9 Technoparks, which share the data of the determined performance indicators up-to-date, according to the analysis of efficiency measurements performed with 3 inputs and 2 outputs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The efficiency of the technoparks was measured with CCR Input and Output Oriented Models, the issues deemed to increase the benefits provided by the technoparks are evaluated, and suggestions are made within the scope of the findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDM) · Technoparks · Mathematical Models

Abstract

Technology Development Zone (Technopark) are units that focuses on working effectively and producing productive works due to their structures. It is known that each technopark differs in terms of its production method and the benefits it provides. This research respond to give information about the general conditions of the Technoparks whose data were shared publicly and they were valuated within the scope of expected and realized benefits. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), one of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods is applied in the study. DEA is considered as one of the most frequently preferred analysis methods to measure efficiency, especially in structures with economic decision-making mechanisms. This paper includes 9 Technoparks, which share the data of the determined performance indicators up-to-date, according to the analysis of efficiency measurements performed with 3 inputs and 2 outputs. Collaboration and patent numbers among the variables used in the study are the output variables; infrastructure, offered advantages and proximity to the university refer to the input variables. The efficiency of the technoparks was measured with CCR Input and Output Oriented Models, the issues deemed to increase the benefits provided by the technoparks are evaluated, and suggestions are made within the scope of the findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİOĞLU, Ş. N., ÖZGÜNER, Z. (2022). EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT OF SELECTED TECHNOPARKS WITH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA). Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 155–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/751823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AKBULUT, K. (2020), Extension of Technopark Boundaries to Include Free Zone, Financial Solution, 30(162), 255-260
  2. AKTAS, A. and KABAK, M. (2020), Analysis of GDP Contribution of NUTS – 2 Regions via Data Envelopment Analysis, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Special Volume, 191-206
  3. ALKIBAY, S., ORHANER, E., KORKMAZ, S. and SERTOGLU, A. E. (2012), Technoparks within the Framework of University-Industry Cooperation, Managerial Problems and Suggested Solutions, Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26(2), 65-90
  4. BATTAL, U. (2020), Measurement of Financial Performance of Airport Groups Companies in Europe: Data Envelopment Analysis Method, Academic Review of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(1) 171-184
  5. BAYCAN, T. and ARKALI OLCAY, G. (2021), Linking the Performance of Entrepreneurial Universities to Technoparks and University Characteristics in Turkey, Region, 8(1), 97-117. DOI: 10.18335/region.v8i1.300
  6. BAYKUL, A., SUNGUR, O. and DULUPCU, M.A. (2016), Evaluation of Management Efficiencies of Technology Development Zones Managing Company Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Visionary, 7 (15), 70-82
  7. BAYZIN, S. and SENGUR, M. (2019), Role of Technoparks In University-Industry Cooperation, The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 15(3), 299-314
  8. BIGLIARDI, B., DORMIO, AI., NOSELLA, A. and PETRONI, G. (2006) Assessing science parks' performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies, Technovation, 26(4). 489-505
  9. BOWLIN, W. F. (1998). Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), The Journal of Cost Analysis, 15(2), 3-27
  10. CANSIZ, M. (2017), Turkey Technoparks to 2023, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development of Social Sectors and Coordination General Directorate, Publication No: 2972, December
  11. CHAN, K., OERLEMANS, L. and PRETORIUS, M. (2010), Knowledge flows and innovative performances of NTBFs in Gauteng, South Africa: An attempt to explain mixed findings in science park research, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering. 4(6), 1440-1454
  12. CHEN, C. J. and HUANG, C. C. (2004), A Multiple Criteria Evaluation of High-Tech Industries for The Science-Based Industrial Park in Taiwan, Information & Management, 41, 839–851
  13. COELLI, T.J., PRASADA RAO, D.S., O’Donnell,