Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Digital Public Relations Practices in Ecological Municipalism: A Study on the Ecological Municipal Capital of 2021, Lahti

Pages
413–424
Publication Date
2022-10-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result; It is seen that the municipality of Lahti fulfills the principles of corporate citizenship on Twitter, which it uses for recognition and promotion purposes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the use of Twitter for public relations purposes of the Lahti municipality was analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, Tweets shared on the Twitter account of the municipality between November 1 and November 30, 2021, were analyzed by discourse and content analysis method in the 2020.2.2 version of the Maxqda program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result; It is seen that the municipality of Lahti fulfills the principles of corporate citizenship on Twitter, which it uses for recognition and promotion purposes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ecological Municipalism · Public Relations · Ecological Capital

Abstract

In this study, the use of Twitter for public relations purposes of the Lahti municipality was analyzed. The study aims to reveal the public relations focus of the ecological municipality approach. In this context, Tweets shared on the Twitter account of the municipality between November 1 and November 30, 2021, were analyzed by discourse and content analysis method in the 2020.2.2 version of the Maxqda program. The findings obtained from the analysis are: In the process that Lahti was elected as an ecological municipality, it shared the most on municipal services and ecological city. The main topics shared by the municipality were identified as Covid-19, Lahti activism, ecological city, and municipal services. The main headings of the macro discourse of this process, which covers municipal services; Lahti city is urban transportation, openings, tender announcements, meetings, cooperation, and events. When these discourse titles are analyzed at the micro-level, it is seen that a simple, active, and everyday language is used. When the shares are examined in rhetoric, reference representation is quite intense in persuasiveness. As a result; It is seen that the municipality of Lahti fulfills the principles of corporate citizenship on Twitter, which it uses for recognition and promotion purposes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜ, S., YAŞAR, L., BİLİCİ, E. (2022). Digital Public Relations Practices in Ecological Municipalism: A Study on the Ecological Municipal Capital of 2021, Lahti. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 413–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/751804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akıncı, İ., Pouya, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2019).
  2. Sürdürülebilir Kent Modeli Olarak, Eko-Kent Önerisi. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 96-107.
  3. Akyol, D., & Sönmez, İ. Ö. (2018). Kentin Yönetiminde Ekolojik Yaklaşımlar: Ankara, İstanbul ve İzmir Uygulamaları Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 27, 45-70.
  4. Archibugi, F. (2019). The ecological city and the city effect: Essays on the urban planning requirements for the sustainable city. Routledge. Bayraktar, Ü. (2020). Belediyelerin Halkla İlişkiler Çalışmalarında İnternet Kullanımı: KKTC Belediyeleri Web Siteleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 2020(51), 20-56. BBC, (2021). “Stockholm Avrupa’nın ilk ekolojik başkenti” https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2010/01/100122_fooc_sweden access date: 27.11. 2021
  5. Bostancı, S. H. (2012). Eco-Municipalities and Municipal Applications for Sustainability. In Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning: Creating Smart Cities (pp. 310-328).
  6. IGI Global. Bostancı, S. H. (2014). Türkiye’de eko belediyecilik modelinin uygulanabilmesi üzerine yaklaşım. Planlama, 24(1), 4-5.
  7. Can, M. C. (2021). Yerel Yönetimlerin Halkı Tanımaya Yönelik Halkla İlişkiler Uygulamaları; Doğu Karadeniz Belediyeler Birliği Örneği. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), 5(Özel Sayı 1), 98-119.
  8. Cassel, S. H. (2008). Trying to be attractive: Image building and identity formation in small industrial municipalities in Sweden. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4(2), 102-114.
  9. Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). “Eko-Kentler: Kent ve Doğa İlişkisinde Yeni Bir Sistem Tasarımı”. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi. 6(1): 12- 16 Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). Eko-kentler: kent ve doğa ilişkisinde yeni bir sistem tasarımı. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 6(1), 12-16.
  10. Çetinkaya, Z. & Ciravoğlu, A. (2016). Sürdürülebilir Yerleşim Modellerinin Karşılaştırılması: Eko-Kent ve Yavaş Kent. İdealkent, 7(18), 246-267.
  11. Çiğdem, A., & Akyol, D. (2016). Ekolojik Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Yönetim Bağlamında Türkiye’de Yerel Yönetimlerin Yasal Olanakları ve 2014 Sonrasındaki Değişimi Turan: Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, 8(32), 244. Dou, X., Li, S., & Wang, J. (2013). Ecological strategy of city sustainable development. APCBEE procedia, 5, 429-434. Fernández, J. E., & Angel, M. (2020). Ecological city-states in an era of environmental disaster: Security, climate change and biodiversity. Sustainability, 12(14), 5532. Gökçe, O. (1995).
  12. İçerik Çözümlemesi, Konya: Selçuk Üniversites