Journals / Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Biocide Use and Its Potential Risks in Aquaculture in Turkey

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2017-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More scientific research in this issue is needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aquacultural production is a rapidly growing industry in our country, as well as all over the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It consisted 73.8 million tons fish production of 167.3 worldwide in 2014, as 240.3 thousand tons fish production of 672.2 in Turkey in 2015; resulting ın an increasing impact on sea and fresh water ecosystems.As the sector expands, there is an increasing use of the disinfectants, chemicals and antifouling products in the production areas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More scientific research in this issue is needed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:aquacultural production · biocide · risk

Abstract

Aquacultural production is a rapidly growing industry in our country, as well as all over the world. It consisted 73.8 million tons fish production of 167.3 worldwide in 2014, as 240.3 thousand tons fish production of 672.2 in Turkey in 2015; resulting ın an increasing impact on sea and fresh water ecosystems.As the sector expands, there is an increasing use of the disinfectants, chemicals and antifouling products in the production areas. Regulations have been made about these chemicals for the potential risks upon the enviromental and human health. In order to prevent contamination, the directive 98/8 of the European Union has permitted the use of disinfective agents (iodoforms, haloorganic compounds, aldehydes, metal salts, hydrogen peroxide) in caviar, ponds and equipments, while the use of other chemicals has been subjected to special permission. Biocide applications has been found to be more harmful in marine environment. Particularly, biocides as DCOID, chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, diuren and zineb which are exist in antifouling paints, used for prevention of the equipments in aquacultural production are considered to be highly toxic chemicals. Three possible risks may be considered about the use of biocides in production, 1. Biocides accumulating in fish and shellfish may contaminate predator and human consumers, 2. Resistance may develop in bacteriae 3. Pollution of natural ecosystem (natural resources of production: river, lake fishery, marine) Knowing the presence of biocides in water environments and its related risks, and ensuring the safe use of water profile are considered essentially important for protecting aquatic organisms and public health. More scientific research in this issue is needed.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGIZLER, İ., AYTAC, N., ALDIK, R. (2017). Biocide Use and Its Potential Risks in Aquaculture in Turkey. Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/751619

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. BALDI, I., GRUBER, A., RONDEAU, V., LEBAILLY, P., BROCHARD, P., FABRIGOULE, C. (2010), Neurobehavioral effects of long-termexposure to pesticides: results from the 4-year follow up of the PHYTONER study. Occup. Environ. Med. 68 (2), 108–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.047811. PMID 21097948. CENGİZLER, I. (2006), Balık Hastalıkları Ders Kitabı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınlan, Yayın No:7 Adana,., 2000 117s. CRAVEDI J.P., CHOUBER G., DELOUS G. (1987), Digestibility of chloramphenicol, oxolinicacid and oxytetracycline in rainbow trout and influence of these antibiotics on lipid digestibility. Aquaculture, 1987 60:133-141.
  2. DIERBERG F.E., KIATTISIMUKUL W. (1996), Issues, impacts, and implications of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand. Environ. Manag. 1996;20:649–666.
  3. DONALD P., WESTON. (1996), Ecological Effects of the Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture Proceedings of the Meeting on the Use of Chemicals In Aquaculture in Asia 20-22 May 1996;
  4. Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines. EGIDIUS E., MØSTER B. (1987), Effect of Neguvonand Nuvantreatment on crabs (Cancer pagurus, C. maenas), lobster (Homarus gammarus) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Aquaculture 1987., 60:165-168. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (1998), Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliamentand of the Council of 16 February Concerningthe Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market. Official Journal of the European Communities L 123/1 of 24.04.98. 1998.
  5. GUARDIOLA FA, CUESTA A, MESEGUER J, ESTEBAN MA., (2012), Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13(2):1541-1560. doi:10.3390/ijms13021541. LANE A., WILLEMSEN P.R. (2004), Collaborative effort looks into biofouling. Fish Farming International September 2004: 34-35. MUÑOZ I., MARTÍNEZ BUENO M.J., AGÜERA A., FERNÁNDEZ-ALBA A.R. (1987), Environmental and human health risk assessment of organicmicro-pollutants occurring in a Spanish marine fish farm. Environ. Pollut.2010;158:1809–1816.
  6. PIMENTEL, D., CULLINEY, T.W., BASHORE, T. (2013), Public Health Risks Associated with Pesticides and Natural Toxins in Foods. IPM World Textbook. Regents of the University of Minnesota. RAILKIN A.I. (2004), Marine biofouling: colonization process and defenses. 2004. ISBN 0-8493-1419-4.
  7. CRC Press.
  8. RICO, A., PHU, T., SATAPORNVANIT, K., MIN, J., SHAHABUDDIN, A. M., HENRIKSSON, P. J. G., VAN DEN BRINK, P. J. (2013), Use of veterinary medicines, feed additives and probiotics in four majör intern