Journals / Diplomasi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Turkey's adjustment to the emerging post-western international order: The Russian connection

Pages
30–44
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

What are the similarities and differences between Russian and Turkish efforts to adapt to the emerging post-western international order?

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent years have witnessed revolutionary changes in Turkey's domestic and international policies as the dynamics of the international order have been changing in a post-western fashion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey, a NATO member since 1952 and an EU membership candidate since July 2005, has been experiencing a difficult relationship with its traditional allies and partners within the western international community over the last decade.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:What are the similarities and differences between Russian and Turkish efforts to adapt to the emerging post-western international order?
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Post-western international order · Turkey · Russia

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed revolutionary changes in Turkey's domestic and international policies as the dynamics of the international order have been changing in a post-western fashion. Turkey, a NATO member since 1952 and an EU membership candidate since July 2005, has been experiencing a difficult relationship with its traditional allies and partners within the western international community over the last decade. This article seeks to analyze the dynamics of Turkey's response to the emerging post-western international order within the framework of Turkey’s domestic environment and foreign policy. Of special importance in this regard is the impact that the so-called Russian revisionism/resurgence has had on Turkey's choices. To what extent and in which ways have the dynamics of Russia's challenge to western primacy in global politics constituted a role model for Turkey? What are the similarities and differences between Russian and Turkish efforts to adapt to the emerging post-western international order?

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZLU, H. T. (2019). Turkey's adjustment to the emerging post-western international order: The Russian connection. Diplomasi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 30–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/750335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Abb, P. (2018) ‘What drives interstate balancing? Estimations of domestic and systemic factors’, International Politics, 55, 2. Akcali, E. & Perincek, M. (2009) ‘Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey’, Geopolitics, 14, 3. Allison, R. (2017) ‘Russia and the post-2014 international legal order: revisionism and realpolitik’, International Affairs, 93, 3. Baranovsky, V. & Mateiko, A. (2016) ‘Responsibility to Protect: Russia’s Approaches’, The International Spectator, 51, 2. Breslin, S. (2018) ‘Global Reordering and China’s Rise: Adoption, Adaptation and Reform’, The International Spectator, 53, 1. Curanovic, A. (2015) ‘The Guardians of Traditional Values: Russia and The Russian Orthodox Church in the Quest for Status’, Transatlantic Academy, 15, 1. Chung, H. C. (2016) ‘The Rise of China and East Asia: A New Regional Order on the Horizon?’, Chinese Political Science Review, 1, 1. Dal, P. E. (2015) ‘A normative approach to contemporary Turkish foreign policy: The cosmopolitanism-communitarism divide’, International Journal, 70, 3. Danforth, N. (2016) ‘The Ottoman Empire from 1923 to Today: In Search of a Usable Past’, Mediterranean Quarterly, 27, 2. Delcour, L. (2018) ‘Lost in Transition: The Liberal International Order in Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus’, The International Spectator, 53, 1. Dworkin, A. & Leonard, M. (2018) ‘Can Europe save the World Order’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 260. Duncombe, C. & Dunne, T. (2018) ‘After Liberal World Order’ International Affairs, 94, 1. Ferguson, C. (2012) ‘The Strategic Use of Soft Balancing: The Normative Dimensions of the Chinese–Russian ‘Strategic Partnership’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 35, 2. Friedberg, L. A. 2018) ‘Competing with China’, Survival, 60, 3. Fukuyama, F. (2014) ‘America in Decay’, Foreign Affairs, 93, 5. German, T. (2017) ‘NATO and the enlargement debate: enhancing Euro-Atlantic security or inciting confrontation?’, International Affairs, 93, 2. Gill, B. & Schreer, B. (2018) ‘Countering China’s “United Front”’, The Washington Quarterly, 41, 2. Harding, H. (2015) ‘Has U.S. China Policy Failed?’, The Washington Quarterly, 28, 3. He, K. (2012) ‘Undermining Adversaries: Unipolarity, Threat Perception, and Negative Balancing Strategies after the Cold War’, Security Studies, 21, 2. Hill, F. & Taspinar, O. (2006) ‘Turkey and Russia: Axis of the Ecluded?’, Survival, 48, 1. Ikenberry, G. John. (2017) ‘The Plot Against American Foreign Policy Can the Liberal Or