Journals / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Classification Tree Method for Determining Factors Associated with Halitosis

Pages
91–97
Publication Date
2021-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The classification tree method showed that the most significant factors affecting halitosis were oral health problems followed by smoking status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Decision trees are data mining techniques for extracting hidden knowledge from large databases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We obtained data from a total of 1.290 patients, consisting of 645 patients with halitosis and 645 healthy controls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The classification tree method showed that the most significant factors affecting halitosis were oral health problems followed by smoking status.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Halitosis · Bad breath · Classification tree method

Abstract

Decision trees are data mining techniques for extracting hidden knowledge from large databases. This study was performed to establish the risk factors associated with halitosis by applying a decision tree model in a Turkish population and examining the interactions between these factors. We obtained data from a total of 1.290 patients, consisting of 645 patients with halitosis and 645 healthy controls. The subjects’ demographic characteristics, smoking status, alcohol intake, medical history and medications were assessed. The presence of potential intraoral causes of halitosis was determined by investigating perceived oral health problems such as caries, periodontal diseases, tongue coating, and oral cavity pathologies. Halitosis level was evaluated using an organoleptic scale. All data were subjected to classification tree analyses. Halitosis was significantly more common in patients with (80.9%) than without (20.7%) oral health problems (P < 0.001). Halitosis was significantly less common in non-smokers without oral health problems than in smokers with oral health problems (14.5%; P < .001). Halitosis was evident in all patients with oral health problems, smokers, and those with respiratory diseases (100%). The effects of systemic diseases on halitosis were significant in non-smokers without oral health problems (P < 0.05). Respiratory conditions showed significant effects on halitosis in smokers with oral health problems (P < 0.01). We developed a decision tree model to identify risk factors associated with halitosis. The classification tree method showed that the most significant factors affecting halitosis were oral health problems followed by smoking status.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOPARAL, M., YILMAZ, U. N., KÜÇÜK, A. Ö., KESKİNRÜZGAR, A., ÜÇKARDEŞ, F. (2021). Classification Tree Method for Determining Factors Associated with Halitosis. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/745303

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alizadehsani R, Habibi J, Hosseini MJ, Mashayekhi H, Boghrati R, Ghandeharioun A, Bahadorian B, Sani ZA. 2013. A data mining approach for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 111(1): 52-61. AlSadhan SA. 2016. Self-perceived halitosis and related factors among adults residing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study. Saudi Dent J, 28(3):118-123.
  2. Amir E, Shimonov R, Rosenberg M. 1999. Halitosis in children. J Pediatr, 134: 338-343.
  3. Ansai T, Takehara T. 2005. Tonsillolith as a halitosis-inducing factor. Br Dent J, 198(5): 263-264.
  4. Arino M, Ito A, Fujiki S, Sugiyama S, Hayashi M. 2016. Multicenter study on caries risk assessment in adults using survival classification and regression trees. Sci Rep, 6: 29190. Barlin JN, Zhou Q, St Clair CM, Iasonos A, Soslow RA, Alektiar KM, Hensley ML, Jr. Leitao MM, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. 2013. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis of endometrial carcinoma: Seeing the forest for the trees. Gynecol Oncol, 130: 452-456.
  5. Bollen CM, Beikler T. 2012. Halitosis: the multidisciplinary approach. Int J Oral Sci, 4(2): 55-63.
  6. Bornstein MM, Stocker BL, Seemann R, Bürgin WB, Lussi A. 2009. Prevalence of halitosis in young male adults: a study in Swiss army recruits comparing self-reported and clinical data. J Periodontol, 80(1): 24-31.
  7. Camdeviren HA, Yazici AC, Akkus Z, Bugdayci R, Sungur MA. 2007. Comparison of logistic regression model and classification tree: An application to postpartum depression data. Expert Sys App, 32: 987-994.
  8. Chang LY, Wang HW. 2006. Analysis of traffic injury severity: an application of non-parametric classification tree techniques. Acc Anly Prev, 38: 1019-1127.
  9. Chen X, Zhang Y, Lu HX, Feng XP. 2016. Factors associated with halitosis in white-collar employees in Shanghai, China. PLoS One, 11: e0155592. Christen AG.1992. The impact of tobacco use and cessation on oral and dental diseases and conditions. Am J Med, 93: 25-31.
  10. Codinach MM, Salas EJ. 2014 Halitosis: Diagnóstico y tratamiento. Av Odontoestomatol, 30: 155-160.
  11. Cortelli JR, Barbosa MD, Westphal MA. 2008. Halitosis: A review of associated factors and therapeutic approach. Braz Oral Res, 22: 44-54. D’Alisa S, Miscio G, Baudo S, Simone A, Tesio L, Mauro A. 2006. Depression is the main determinant of quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A classification regression (CART) study. Disabil Rehabil, 28: 307-314. Eldarrat AH. 2016. Influence of oral health and lifestyle on oral malodour. Int Dent J, 61