Journals / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

An Overview of Orthodontic Functional Analysis

Pages
335–340
Publication Date
2021-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the objective of this literature overview is to explain the need of the functional analysis in modern orthodontics and the parts and components involved in the examination of the functional units of the stomatognathic system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Functional analysis is mainly concerned with the functional units of the masticatory system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given the gradual development and indirect accumulative effect of occlusal disharmonies, functional analysis could be considered the only method that can demonstrate malocclusions and their possible connections with functional disturbances and disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the objective of this literature overview is to explain the need of the functional analysis in modern orthodontics and the parts and components involved in the examination of the functional units of the stomatognathic system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temporomandibular joints · Temporomandibular disorders · Functional analysis

Abstract

Functional analysis is mainly concerned with the functional units of the masticatory system. Given the gradual development and indirect accumulative effect of occlusal disharmonies, functional analysis could be considered the only method that can demonstrate malocclusions and their possible connections with functional disturbances and disorders. Thus, analysis of the functional units of the stomatognathic system should follow the clinical examination of the various components of the craniofacial complex in static and dynamic relationship, to achieve a comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Assessment of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) is one of the major elements of the functional analysis, and one of the long-term objectives of orthodontic treatment is to obtain an optimal function and health of the TMJs and masticatory system. Therefore, many studies discuss the condition of the TMJs in the pre- and post-treatment phases, regarding the disorders that may be present or will develop in the future. In this context, the objective of this literature overview is to explain the need of the functional analysis in modern orthodontics and the parts and components involved in the examination of the functional units of the stomatognathic system.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, A., ABDULHUSSEİN, Z. (2021). An Overview of Orthodontic Functional Analysis. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 335–340. https://ajindex.com/articles/745295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abekura H, Kotani H, Tokuyama H, Hamada T. 1995. Asymmetry of masticatory muscle activity during intercuspal maximal clenching in healthy subjects and subjects with stomatognathic dysfunction syndrome. J Oral Rehab, 22(9): 699-704.
  2. Anitua E, Duran-Cantolla J, Almeida GZ, Alkhraisat MH. 2017. Minimizing the mandibular advancement in an oral appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Medicine, 34: 226-231.
  3. Bosman F, Van Der Bilt A, Abbink JH, Van Der Glas HW. 2004. Neuromuscular control mechanisms in human mastication. J Texture Stud, 35(2): 201-221. Brodie AG. 1941. On the growth pattern of the human head. From the third month to the eighth year of life. Amerikan J Anatomy, 68(2): 209-262. Dahlström L. 1989. Electromyographic studies of craniomandibular disorders: a review of the literature. J Oral Rehab, 16(1): 1-20. de Lima Lucas B, Barbosa TS, Castelo PM, Gaviao MBD. 2017.
  4. Influence of anthropometry, TMD, and sex on molar bite force in adolescents with and without orthodontic needs. J Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 78(6): 487-493.
  5. Denes B J, Lazzarotto B, Bresin A, Kiliaridis S. 2018. Effect of different masticatory functional demands on the 3D mandibular condyle morphology of growing rats using posterior bite-blocks. European J Orthod, 40(3): 312-316.
  6. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Brandmaier I, Scheiderbauer G, Rudisch A, Bogner G. 2002. Ultrasonographic assessment of local cross‐sectional dimensions of masseter muscle sites: a reproducible technique? J Oral Rehab, 29(11): 1059-1062. Eschler J. 1965. On the physiology and pathology of the lower jaw. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie 26(1): 31-42.
  7. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Ciusa V. 2000. An electromyographic investigation of masticatory muscles symmetry in normo‐occlusion subjects. J Oral Rehab, 27(1): 33-40.
  8. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, D'Addona A, Miani A. 1991. Reproducibility of electromyographic measures: a statistical analysis. J Oral Rehab, 18(6): 513-521.
  9. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Serrao G, Tartaglia G. 1996. Open–close movements in the human temporomandibular joint: does a pure rotation around the intercondylar hinge axis exist? J Oral Rehab, 23(6): 401-408. Fränkel R, Fränkel C. 1983. A functional approach to treatment of skeletal open bite. American J Orthod, 84(1): 54-68.
  10. Georgiakaki I, Tortopidis D, Garefis P, Kiliaridis S. 2007. Ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle of human females. J Oral Rehab, 34(2): 121