Journals / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The Assessment of Anesthesia Techniques Used in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section: Comparison of Day and Night Shift Periods

Sezaryen Operasyonlarında Uygulanan Anestezi Tekniğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Mesai İçi Ve Dışı Saatlerin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
463–470
Publication Date
2022-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The systolic and diastolic blood pressures were statistically lower (P=0.001) and gestational age was higher in the day shift group (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study at Uludağ University Medical Faculty Hospital between the periods of 2012 January and 2013 December, we aimed to evaluate cesarean indications, anesthesia techniques used for the cesarean sections and the factors affecting the technical choice during day and night shift periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data of 1025 cesarean section patients and neonates were recorded retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The systolic and diastolic blood pressures were statistically lower (P=0.001) and gestational age was higher in the day shift group (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen · Rejyonal anestezi · Genel anestezi

Abstract

In our study at Uludağ University Medical Faculty Hospital between the periods of 2012 January and 2013 December, we aimed to evaluate cesarean indications, anesthesia techniques used for the cesarean sections and the factors affecting the technical choice during day and night shift periods. Data of 1025 cesarean section patients and neonates were recorded retrospectively. Day and night shifts were determined and patients were divided into two groups accordingly. Fifty-one percent of patients were operated on during day shifts, while 49% of patients were operated on during night shifts. General anesthesia was administered to %76.4, spinal anesthesia was administered to 14.4%, combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia was administered to 6.2% and epidural anesthesia was administered to 3% of the patients. Spinal and general anesthesia were used equally in day and night shifts whereas CSE anesthesia rate was higher during day shifts (P=0.003). In 91.3% of patients who were administered regional anesthesia the procedures were successful, whereas in 8.7%, they were not. Failed regional anesthesia rate was similar in both groups. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures were statistically lower (P=0.001) and gestational age was higher in the day shift group (P

Özet

Çalışmamızda Ocak 2012 – Aralık 2013 tarihleri arasında Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi’nde mesai saatleri içinde ve dışında alınan sezaryen olgularında sezaryen endikasyonlarını, uygulanan anestezi tekniğini ve teknik seçimini etkileyen faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçladık. Sezaryen olan 1025 olgunun ve doğan bebeklerinin verileri retrospektif olarak kaydedildi. Mesai içi/dışı saatler tanımlanarak olgular gruplandırıldı. Olguların %51,3’ünün mesai içinde, %48,7’sinin mesai dışında alındığı çalışmamızda genel anestezi %76,4, spinal anestezi %14,4, kombine spinal epidural (KSE) anestezi %6,2, epidural anestezi %3 oranlarında uygulanmıştı. Spinal ve genel anestezi uygulanma oranı mesai içinde ve dışında eşitken, KSE anestezi uygulanma oranının mesai içinde daha fazla olduğu saptandı (P=0,003). Rejyonal anestezilerin %91,3’ü başarılı %8,7’si başarısızdı. Başarısız rejyonal anestezi oranı her iki grupta da benzerdi. Mesai içi sistolik ve diyastolik arter basınçları (SAB/DAB) daha düşük (P=0,001), gebelik haftası daha yüksekti (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKUMİT, Ö., BALKAYA, A. N., EYGİ, E., ŞAHİN, Ş., KORFALİ, S. G. (2022). The Assessment of Anesthesia Techniques Used in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section: Comparison of Day and Night Shift Periods. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 463–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/745178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Algert CS, Bowen JR, Giles WB, Knoblanche GE, Lain SJ, Roberts CL. 2009. Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Med, 7: 20. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. 2016. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regionaland national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One, 11: e148343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. Birnbach DJ, Browne IM. 2010. Obstetrik Anestezi. In: Miller RD. Miller Anestezi. Altıncı Baskı.
  2. Güven Kitapevi, İzmir, Türkiye, pp: 2307-2344.
  3. Çağlayan EK, Kara M, Gürel Y. 2011. Kliniğimizde üç yıllık sezaryen oranı ve endikasyonları. J Exp Clin Medic, 27(2): 50-53.
  4. Devroe S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. 2015. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 28(3): 240-246. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000185. Frölich MA. 2015. Obstetrik Anestezi. In: Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD (eds). Morgan&Mikhail Klinik Anesteziyoloji. Beşinci Baskı,
  5. Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 843-876.
  6. Genç S, Soysal Mİ. 2018. Parametric and nonparametric post hoc tests. BSJ Eng Sci, 1(1): 18-27.
  7. Gori F, Pasqualucci A, Corradetti F, Milli M, Peduto VA. 2007. Maternal and neonatal outcome after cesarean section: the impact of anesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 20: 53-57.
  8. Gülhaş N, Şanlı M, Özgül Ü, Begeç Z, Durmuş M. 2012. Sezaryenlerde anestezi yönetimi: Retrospektif değerlendirme. İnönü Üniv Tıp Fak Derg, 19(3): 142-145.
  9. Gürsoy C, Ok G, Aydın D, Eser E, Erbüyün K, Tekin İ, Baytur Y, Uyar Y. 2014. Sezaryen olgularında anestezi yöntemlerinin günlük yaşamsal aktivitelere dönüş üzerine etkileri. Turk J Anaesth Reanim, 42: 71-79.
  10. Karaca Ü, Özgunay ŞE, Ata F, Kılıçarslan N, Yılmaz C, Karasu D. 2020. Our experiences of anesthesia in emergency cesareans. JARSS, 28(4): 275-280.
  11. Karaman S, Akercan F, Akarsu T, Fırat V, Ozcan O, Karadadas N. 2005. Comparison of the maternal and neonatal effects of epidural block and of combined spinal-epidural block for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 121: 18-23.
  12. Kavak ZN, Başgül A, Ceyhan N. 2001. Short-term outcome of new born infants: spinal versus genaral anesthesia for elective cesarean section. A prospective randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gyneol Reprod Biol, 100: 50-54. Kinsella SM. 2008. A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 caesarean sections. Anaesthesia, 63(8): 822-832.
  13. Lai HY, Tsai PS, Fan YC, Huang C. 2014. Anesthetic practice for Caesarean sect