Journals / Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma / 2010 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Ethnobotanical aspects of Kapıdağ Peninsula Turkey

Kapıdağ yarımadası’nın Türkiye etnobotanik özellikleri

Pages
15–22
Publication Date
2010-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In all 88 taxa belonging to total 47 plant families were evaluated ethnobotanically

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Kapıdağ Peninsula lying in the northwest of Marmara Region of Turkey and with an area of 300 km2 is situated in the province of Balıkesir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An ethnobotanical survey was undertaken during 2004–2006. 119 people from 7 villages in Kapıdağ Peninsula were interviewed in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In all 88 taxa belonging to total 47 plant families were evaluated ethnobotanically
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2004–2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Balıkesir · Etnobotanik · Kapıdağ Yarımadası

Abstract

The Kapıdağ Peninsula lying in the northwest of Marmara Region of Turkey and with an area of 300 km2 is situated in the province of Balıkesir. An ethnobotanical survey was undertaken during 2004–2006. 119 people from 7 villages in Kapıdağ Peninsula were interviewed in this study. Being evaluated, the information obtained about the use of plants was classified as medicinal 44 taxa belonging to 33 families , food 40 taxa belonging to 21 families , dye 4 taxa belonging to 4 families , fuel 4 taxa belonging to 4 families , ornamental 5 taxa belonging to 5 families and other purposes 12 taxa belonging to 11 families . In all 88 taxa belonging to total 47 plant families were evaluated ethnobotanically

Özet

Türkiye’nin Kuzeybatı Marmara Bölgesi’nde yer alan ve 300 km2 yüzölçümü olan Kapıdağ Yarımadası, Balıkesir ili sınırları içerisindedir. Bu yarımadada 2004-2006 yılları arasında etnobotanik bir çalışma yapıldı. Bu araştırmada, yarımadada bulunan 7 köye ait 119 kaynak kişi ile görüşülmüştür. Bitkilerin kullanımı ile ilgili olarak elde edilen bilgiler değerlendirildiğinde, tıbbi 33 familyaya ait 44 takson , gıda 21 familyaya ait 40 takson , boya 4 familyaya ait 4 takson , yakıt 4 familyaya ait 4 takson , süs 5 familyaya ait 5 takson ve diğer kullanım amaçları 11 familyaya ait 12 takson olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Sonuçta, toplam olarak 47 familyaya ait 88 takson etnobotanik özellikleri açısından değerlendirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, İ., ONAR, S., KARABACAK, E., ÇELİK, S. (2010). Ethnobotanical aspects of Kapıdağ Peninsula Turkey. Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/744909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akman, Y., Daget, P.H. 1971. Quelques aspectes synoptiques des climate de la Turquie. Bull. Soc. Long. Geogr. 5/3 Al-Khalil, S. 1995. A survey of plants used in Jordanian traditional medicine. International Journal of Pharmacognosy. 33: 317-323.
  2. Alpınar, K. 1999. Ayvalık (Balıkesir) ve yakınlarındaki adaların floristik ve etnobotanik açısından değerlendirilmeleri, TBAG-1407, Ankara.
  3. Alpınar, K., Saçlı, S. 1997. A bibliography about ethnobotanical studies in Turkey. Proceedings of the XIth Symposium on Plant Originated Crude Drugs, Ankara. 157-166.
  4. Baytop, T. 1984. Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (past and present). İstanbul University Publications No. 3255/40, İstanbul.
  5. Cansaran, A., Kaya, Ö.F. 2010. Contributions of the ethnobotanical investigation carried out in Amasya district of Turkey (Amasya-Center, Bağlarüstü, Boğaköy and Vermiş villages; Yassıçal and Ziyaret towns). Biological Diversity and Conservation (BioDiCon). 3/2. 97-116.
  6. Davis, P.H. 1965-1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vols I-IX. Edinburgh University Press,
  7. Edinburgh. Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., Tan, K. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol X (Supplement 1). Edinburgh University Press,
  8. Edinburgh. De Natale, A., Pollio, A. 2007. Plants species in the folk medicine of Montecorvino Rovella (inland Campania, Italy). Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 109: 295-303.
  9. Doğan, Y., Başlar, S., Ay, G., Mert, H.H. 2005. The use of wild edible plants in Western and Central Anatolia (Turkey). Economic Botany. 54/4: 684-690.
  10. Erikson, H.E. 1980. Identity and the Life Cycle. WW Norton & Co. Ltd, New York. Ertuğ, F. 2000. An ethnobotanical study in Central Anatolia (Turkey). Economic Botany. 54/2: 155-182.
  11. Everest, A., Öztürk, E. 2005. Focusing on the ethnobotanical uses of plants in Mersin and Adana provinces (Turkey). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 1: 1-6.
  12. Fujita, T., Sezik, E., Tabata, M., Yeşilada, E., Honda, G., Takeda, Y., Tanaka, T., Takaishi, Y. 1995. Traditional medicine in Turkey. VII. Folk medicine in Middle and West Black Sea regions. Economic Botany. 49: 406-422.
  13. Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., Başer, K.H.C. 2000. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands Vol XI (Supplement 2). Edinburgh University Press,
  14. Edinburgh. Hoareau, L., Da Silva, E.J. 1999. Medicinal plants: a re-emerging health aid. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2/2: 57-70.
  15. Honda, G., Yeşilada, E., Tabata, M., Sezik, E., Fujita, T., Takeda, Y., Tanaka, T., Takaishi, Y. 1996. Traditiona