SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma / 2011 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

A comparative anatomical study on two endemic Nepeta L. species N. baytopii and N. sorgerae

Mikail ACAR
Taner OZCAN
Fatih SATIL
Tuncay DIRMENCI
Pages
58–70
Publication Date
2011-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And the trichome covers of these two species are different from each other

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nepeta baytopii sect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was investigated on stem-leaf anatomy and trichomes micromorphology of these Nepeta species in order to improve our knowledge of its anatomy for systematics and to help separate the species.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And the trichome covers of these two species are different from each other
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anatomy · Endemic · Nepeta baytopii

Abstract

Nepeta baytopii sect. Schizocalyx and N. sorgerae sect. Subinterruptae are the two endemic species of the genus Nepeta L. in Turkey. In this paper, this two Nepeta species which are in two different sections are examined anatomically. In this study, it was investigated on stem-leaf anatomy and trichomes micromorphology of these Nepeta species in order to improve our knowledge of its anatomy for systematics and to help separate the species. The anatomical characters of the species, such as stem and leaf are described in detail. The anatomical results were compared to the same investigations done before. In anatomical studies, cross-sections of stems and leaves were examined and are supported by illustrations and photographs. Also, trichomes in stems and leaves were investigated by LM and SEM. Anatomical characters of the species were observed to be similar to the usual features of Lamiaceae anatomy. Finally, these two species are different for serriate of pericycle, collenchyma, xylem and phloem. And the trichome covers of these two species are different from each other

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, M., OZCAN, T., SATIL, F., DIRMENCI, T. (2011). A comparative anatomical study on two endemic Nepeta L. species N. baytopii and N. sorgerae. Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 58–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/744855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Budantsev, A. L. and Lobova, T. A. 1997. Fruit morphology, anatomy and taxonomy of Tribe Nepeteae (Labiatae). Edinburgh J Bot 54: 183-216.
  2. Cantino, P. D. 1990. The phylogenetic significance of stomata and trichomes in the Labiatae and Verbanaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 71, 323-370.
  3. Çelenk S., Dirmenci T., Malyer H., Bıçakçı A. 2008. A palynological study of the genus Nepeta L. (Lamiaceae). Plant Syst Evol, 276:105–123.
  4. Dirmenci T., Yıldız B., Tümen G. 2004. Threatened Categories of Four Nepeta L. (Lamiaceae) Species Endemic to the East Anatolia. Turk J Bot 28:221-226.
  5. Dirmenci, T. 2005. A new subspecies of Nepeta (Lamiaceae) from Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 147: 229-233.
  6. Guner, A., Ozhatay, N., Ekim, T. and Baser, KHC. (eds.) 2000. Nepeta L. in: Guner A (ed), Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, vol. 11 (Supplement II). Edinburgh University Press.
  7. Harley, R. M., Atkins, S., Budanstev, A. L., Cantino, P. D., Conn, B. J., Grayer, R., Harley, M. M. 2004. Labiatae. In: Kubitzki, K. (Ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants VII. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. Hedge I. C., Lamond J. 1982. Nepeta L. In: Davis PH, ed. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 7, 264–288. Hedge IC. 1986. Lamiaceae of south-west Asia: diversity, distribution and endemism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 89B: 23–25.
  8. Jamzad, Z., Harley, M. M, Ingrouille, M., Simmonds, M. S. J., Jalili, A. 2000. Pollen exine and nutlet surface morphology of the annual species of Nepeta L. (Lamiaceae) in Iran. In: Harley MM, Morton GM, Blackmore S (eds) Pollen and spores: morphology and biology. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, London, pp 385–397.
  9. Kaya, A. Başer K.H.C., Koca F., Özdemir A., 1991. Eskişehir Çevresi Nepeta Türleri Üzerinde Morfolojik ve Anatomik Araştırmalar, 9. Bitkisel ilaç Hammaddeleri Toplantısı, 16-19
  10. Mayıs, Eskişehir, Bildiriler, 311 317., 1991
  11. Kaya, A. Koca F., Başer K.H.C., 1997. Nepeta caesarea Boiss. Türü Üzerinde Morfolojik ve Anatomik Araştırmalar, XIII. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 17-20
  12. Eylül, İstanbul,
  13. Botanik Seksiyonu, Cilt 1, 411-420.
  14. Kaya, A., Dirmenci T., 2008. “Nutlet surface micromorphology and taxonomy of species of the genus Nepeta L. (Lamiaceae) in Turkey” Turkish.J.Bot.32: 103-112.
  15. Navarro, T., El Oualidi. J., 2000. Trichomes morphology in Teucrium L. (Labiatae). A taxonomic review. Ann. Jard. Bot. Madrid 57, 277-297.
  16. Pojarkova, A. I. 1954. Nepeta L.: 191–293. In: Shishkin BK (ed) Flora of the USSR, vol 20. Ac