Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Aktif Öğretim Yöntemlerinden Beyin Fırtınası Yöntemi ve Uygulaması

AKTİF ÖĞRETİM YÖNTEMLERİNDEN BEYİN FIRTINASI YÖNTEMİ VE UYGULAMASI

Pages
441–450
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study it has been aimed how the practice stages can be achieved by exposing the institutional foundations of the brainstorm method The brainstorm method is important for the reason of improving student’s creativity forming democratic consciousness and solving problems Students are ensured to join classes actively by means of this method Thus it is seemed that it is based on more integrative and cooperation system than the traditional education methods Otherwise it is possible to produce a lot and various thoughts by the brainstorm method Finally it will be effective that teachers apply the brainstorm method when it is necessary Key word: Brainstorm Method Practice Teacher

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it has been aimed how the practice stages can be achieved by exposing the institutional foundations of the brainstorm method The brainstorm method is important for the reason of improving student’s creativity forming democratic consciousness and solving problems Students are ensured to join classes actively by means of this method Thus it is seemed that it is based on more integrative and cooperation system than the traditional education methods Otherwise it is possible to produce a lot and various thoughts by the brainstorm method Finally it will be effective that teachers apply the brainstorm method when it is necessary Key word: Brainstorm Method Practice Teacher
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study it has been aimed how the practice stages can be achieved by exposing the institutional foundations of the brainstorm method The brainstorm method is important for the reason of improving student’s creativity forming democratic consciousness and solving problems Students are ensured to join classes actively by means of this method Thus it is seemed that it is based on more integrative and cooperation system than the traditional education methods Otherwise it is possible to produce a lot and various thoughts by the brainstorm method Finally it will be effective that teachers apply the brainstorm method when it is necessary Key word: Brainstorm Method Practice Teacher
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study it has been aimed how the practice stages can be achieved by exposing the institutional foundations of the brainstorm method The brainstorm method is important for the reason of improving student’s creativity forming democratic consciousness and solving problems Students are ensured to join classes actively by means of this method Thus it is seemed that it is based on more integrative and cooperation system than the traditional education methods Otherwise it is possible to produce a lot and various thoughts by the brainstorm method Finally it will be effective that teachers apply the brainstorm method when it is necessary Key word: Brainstorm Method Practice Teacher
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Beyin Fırtınası · Yöntem · Uygulama

Abstract

In this study it has been aimed how the practice stages can be achieved by exposing the institutional foundations of the brainstorm method The brainstorm method is important for the reason of improving student’s creativity forming democratic consciousness and solving problems Students are ensured to join classes actively by means of this method Thus it is seemed that it is based on more integrative and cooperation system than the traditional education methods Otherwise it is possible to produce a lot and various thoughts by the brainstorm method Finally it will be effective that teachers apply the brainstorm method when it is necessary Key word: Brainstorm Method Practice Teacher

Özet

Bu çalışmada, beyin fırtınası yönteminin kuramsal temelleri ortaya konularak uygulama aşamalarının nasıl gerçekleştirilebileceği amaçlanmıştır. Beyin fırtınası yöntemi, öğrencilerin yaratıcılıklarını geliştirebilme, demokratik bilinç oluşturabilme ve problemleri çözebilmeleri açısından önemlidir. Bu yöntemle öğrencilerin aktif olarak derse katılımları sağlanmaktadır. Böylece de geleneksel öğretim yöntemlerinden daha bütünleştirici ve işbirliğine dayalı olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca beyin fırtınası yöntemi ile birçok ve çeşitli düşüncelerin üretilmesi de mümkündür. Sonuçta, öğretmenlerin beyin fırtınası yöntemini yeri geldiğince derslerde uygulaması etkili olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, D. Ç. (2005). Aktif Öğretim Yöntemlerinden Beyin Fırtınası Yöntemi ve Uygulaması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 441–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/74182

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Açıkgöz, K. (2003).
  2. Etkili Öğrenme ve Öğretme, Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları,
  3. İzmir.
  4. Aiken, M; Krosp, J; Shirani, A. Martin, J. (1974). Electronic Brainstorming in Small and Large Groups Information Management, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Caine, R. N.; Caine G. (2002).
  5. Making Connections, Teaching and the Human Brain, Beyin Temelli Öğrenme, Çev: Ülgen, G.; Turgut, O.; Ergen, H.; Uğur, Y., Nobel Yayınları,
  6. Ankara.
  7. Coon, D. (1983). Introduction to Psychology: Exploration and Application. (Fourth Edition), St. Paul, Minnesota: Northwest. Çalık, T. (2003). Yönetimde Problem Çözme Teknikleri, (“Beyin Fırtınası”, Melek Çakmak), Nobel Yayınları,
  8. Ankara.
  9. Davies, I. K. (1971). The Management of Learning. Mc. Graw Hill, P.169-77,
  10. London. De Cecco, J. P.; Crawford, W. R. (1974). The Pyschology of Learning and Instruction, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Demirel, Ö. (1995).
  11. Genel Öğretim Yöntemleri, Usem Yayınları II, Ankara.
  12. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Plandan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı, Pegem Yayıncılık, 5. Baskı,
  13. Ankara.
  14. Diehl, M.; Stroebe, W. (1987). “Productivity Loss in Idea Generating Groups: Training Dawn the Blocking Effect”, Journal of Personallity and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
  15. Erginer, E. (2000).
  16. Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Anı Yayınları,
  17. Ankara.
  18. Ggow, L.; Kember, D. (1990). “Does Higher Education Promote Independent Learning? Higher Education, (19), p.307-322.
  19. Hardingam, A. (1997).
  20. Takım Çalışması, Çev: A. Bora ve O. Cankoçak, İlkkaynak Yayınları,
  21. Ankara.
  22. Joyce, B. Ve Weil, M. (1996).
  23. Models of Teaching, Allyn and Bacon, Fifth ed., Boston. Knowles, M. S. (1990). The Modern Practice of Adult Education, Educational Technology Publications, Inc. Enlewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Küçükahmet, L. (1995).
  24. Genel Öğretim Yöntemleri, Gazi Büro Kitabevi,
  25. Ankara.
  26. McCarthy, B. (1987). The 4 MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques, Barrington: Excel, Inc. MEB, Ortaöğretim Programlarındaki Yönelmeler, Talim ve Terbiye Dairesi Yayınları, No:16, MEB. Ankara.
  27. Morris, S. And McCarthy, B. (1990). 4 MAT in Action II: Sample Lesson Plans for Use with the 4 MAT System, Barrington: Excel, Inc. Nakiboğlu, M. (1998). “Biyoloji Eğitiminde Beyin Fırtınası Yöntemi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, A.F.S. Projesi, Proje No:0901.98.01.05. Nakiboğlu, M. (2003). “Kuramdan Uygulamaya Beyin Fırtınası Yöntemi”, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt:1, Sayı:3, 341-350,
  28. Orlich, D. C.; Harder, R. J.; Callahan, R. C.; Kauchak, D. P.; Pendergrass, R. A.; Keogh, A. J.; Gibson, H.