SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

CYCLIC FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF ROTATE, EDGEFILE PLATINUM, AND K3XF FILES EXPOSED TO INTRACANAL TEMPERATURE IN AN S-SHAPED CANAL

Salih DÜZGÜN
Hüseyin Sinan TOPÇUOĞLU
Hakan ARSLAN
Sezer DEMİRBUĞA
Pages
542–546
Publication Date
2021-10-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key Words : AH Plus, alexidine, bond strength, chlorhexidine, EDTA, Qmix

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of resin-based sealer to dentin after using different final irrigation solutions, one of which is alexidine dihydrochloride (ALX).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and method: A total of 90 human maxillary central teeth were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key Words : AH Plus, alexidine, bond strength, chlorhexidine, EDTA, Qmix
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AH Plus · alexidine · bond strength

Özet

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of resin-based sealer to dentin after using different final irrigation solutions, one of which is alexidine dihydrochloride (ALX). Material and method: A total of 90 human maxillary central teeth were used. The groups were designed according to the final irrigation solution applied, as follows: Group 1: 17% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), Group 2: QMix, Group 3: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) , Group 4: 1% ALX, and Group 5: Distilled water (Control group). All canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus. For bonding strength measurement, three horizontal sections of 2 mm thickness were obtained from each sample towards the coronal to apical. Push-out force was applied until bond failure occurred. Modes of failure were classified by examining each sample using a stereomicroscope as follows: adhesive (sealer-dentin or sealer-gutta-percha interface), cohesive (failure within sealer or dentin), mixed (failure in both the sealer and dentin). The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison among the groups (p < 0.05). Results: The mean highest values were obtained from the coronal, middle and apical regions, respectively (p < 0.05). The highest significant values for bonding strength was obtained in the EDTA group and the lowest in the control group (p < 0.001). There are no statistical differences among QMix, CHX and ALX groups, except for the coronal third, where the bond strength for the QMix was higher compared to the other two groups (p=0.001). All samples showed the cohesive failure type in most. Conclusion: Bonding strength is high when EDTA is used in any of the three parts of the root canal. ALX showed similar bond strengths to CHX. Key Words : AH Plus, alexidine, bond strength, chlorhexidine, EDTA, Qmix

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜZGÜN, S., TOPÇUOĞLU, H. S., ARSLAN, H., DEMİRBUĞA, S. (2021). CYCLIC FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF ROTATE, EDGEFILE PLATINUM, AND K3XF FILES EXPOSED TO INTRACANAL TEMPERATURE IN AN S-SHAPED CANAL. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 542–546. https://ajindex.com/articles/735614

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic topics. 2005;10(1):30-76
  2. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2002;94(6):658-66
  3. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2010;13(4):256
  4. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. Journal of endodontics. 2007;33(8):966-9
  5. Chhabra R, Huff J, Haseman J, Elwell M, Peters A. Carcinogenicity of p-chloroaniline in rats and mice. Food and chemical toxicology. 1991;29(2):119-24
  6. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, Johnson B, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX. International endodontic journal. 2012;45(4):363-71
  7. Barrios R, Ferrer-Luque CM, Arias-Moliz MT, Ruiz-Linares M, Bravo M, Baca P. Antimicrobial substantivity of alexidine and chlorhexidine in dentin. J Endod. 2013;39(11):1413-5
  8. Kasikci E, Aydemir E, Yogurtcu BM, Sahin F, Bayrak OF. Repurposing of Alexidine Dihydrochloride as an Apoptosis Initiator and Cell Cycle Inhibitor in Human Pancreatic Cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2020;20(16):1956-65
  9. Wang C, Niederstrasser H, Douglas PM, Lin R, Jaramillo J, Li Y, et al. Small-molecule TFEB pathway agonists that ameliorate metabolic syndrome in mice and extend C. elegans lifespan. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2270. 10. da Silva TM, Alves FR, Lutterbach MT, Paiva MM, Ferreira DC. Comparison of antibacterial activity of alexidine alone or as a final irrigant with sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. BDJ Open. 2018;4:18003
  10. Jain K, Agarwal P, Jain S, Seal M, Adlakha T. Alexidine versus chlorhexidine for endodontic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(3):398-402
  11. Akisue E, Tomita VS, Gavini G, Poli de Figueiredo JA. Effect of the combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on dentinal permeability and scanning electron microscopy precipitate observation. J Endod. 2010;36(5):847-50
  12. Czopik B, Ciechomska M, Zarzecka J, Góra M, Woźniakiewicz M. Insight into the Reaction of Alexidine with Sodium Hypochlorite: A Potential Error in Endodontic Treatment. Molecules. 2021;26(6)
  13. Varadan P, Ganesh A, Konindala R, Nagendrababu V, Ashok R, Deivanayagam K. Compar