SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

FORTIFICATION OF FRACTURED INSTRUMENT REMOVAL SIMULATED ROOTS USING SEVERAL CALCIUM SILICATE-BASED MATERIALS

Kırık Enstrüman Çıkartılma Simülasyonu Yapılmış Köklerin Farklı Kalsiyum Silikat İçerikli Materyaller Kullanılarak Güçlendirilmesi

Tuğrul ASLAN
Yakup ÜSTÜN
İbrahim ŞENER
Firdevs ÇINAR
Salih DÜZGÜN
Pages
249–255
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical interpretations were made(α=0.05).Results: G2, G3, G4, and G5 showed greater fractureresistances than G1 (p0.05).Conclusions: Any of the tested materials could be chosento reinforce the root after the removal of a fracturedinstrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate theforces required to fracture roots obturated with differentcalcium silicate – based materials, after applying afractured instrument removal simulation.Material and Methods: Seventy-five mandibularpremolars were selected and decoronated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tomimic the root canal anatomy after the removal of afractured instrument, each canal was enlarged with a size3 Peeso reamer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical interpretations were made(α=0.05).Results: G2, G3, G4, and G5 showed greater fractureresistances than G1 (p0.05).Conclusions: Any of the tested materials could be chosento reinforce the root after the removal of a fracturedinstrument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate theforces required to fracture roots obturated with differentcalcium silicate – based materials, after applying afractured instrument removal simulation.Material and Methods: Seventy-five mandibularpremolars were selected and decoronated. Then, all rootcanals were instrumented using Reciproc system. Tomimic the root canal anatomy after the removal of afractured instrument, each canal was enlarged with a size3 Peeso reamer. The specimens were distributed intoexperimental groups according to the materials used forthe root fortification: G1: Negative control, G2: ProRootMTA, G3: Ortho MTA, G4: Biodentine, G5: EndocemMTA. Then, the teeth were embedded into acrylic blocks.A vertical fracture test was applied, and the fracture loadswere recorded. Statistical interpretations were made(α=0.05).Results: G2, G3, G4, and G5 showed greater fractureresistances than G1 (p0.05).Conclusions: Any of the tested materials could be chosento reinforce the root after the removal of a fracturedinstrument.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kırık enstrüman çıkartılması simülasyonu uygulanmasından sonra farklı kalsiyum silikat içerikli materyallerle doldurulmuş kökleri kırmak için gereken kuvvetlerin değerlendirilmesi idi. Gereç ve Yöntem: 75 adet mandibular premolar diş seçildi ve dekorone edildi. Daha sonra, tüm kök kanalları Reciproc sistemi kullanılarak enstrümante edildi. Kırık enstrüman çıkartılmasının ardından meydana gelen kök kanal anatomisini taklit etmek için herbir kanal 3-numara Peeso frezi ile genişletildi. Örnekler kök güçlendirme işlemi için kullanılan materyallere göre deneysel gruplara dağıtıldı: G1: Negatif kontrol, G2: ProRoot MTA, G3: Ortho MTA, G4: Biodentine, G5: Endocem MTA. Daha sonra, dişler akrilik bloklara gömüldü. Vertikal kırılma testi uygulandı ve kırılma yükleri kaydedildi. İstatistiksel değerlendirmeler yapıldı (α=0,05). Bulgular: G2, G3, G4 ve G5, G1’den daha yüksek kırılma dirençleri gösterdi (p0,05). Sonuç: Test edilen tüm materyaller, kırık enstrüman çıkartılmasının ardından kök güçlendirilmesi için seçenek olabilirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, T., ÜSTÜN, Y., ŞENER, İ., ÇINAR, F., DÜZGÜN, S. (2022). FORTIFICATION OF FRACTURED INSTRUMENT REMOVAL SIMULATED ROOTS USING SEVERAL CALCIUM SILICATE-BASED MATERIALS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 249–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/477015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod 2013;39:569-81
  2. Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. Br Dent J 2008;204:241-5
  3. Knowles KI, Hammond NB, Biggs SG, Ibarrola JL. Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod 2006;32:14-6
  4. Wolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, et al. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. J Endod 2006;32:1139-41
  5. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32:1048-52
  6. Siqueira JF, Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34:1-10
  7. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003;29:523-8
  8. Gerek M, Baser ED, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Bayirli G. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:429-34
  9. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010;36:400-13. 10.Kim M, Yang W, Kim H, Ko H. Comparison of the Biological Properties of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and Endocem MTA Cements. J Endod 2014;40:1649-53. 11.Lee BN, Son HJ, Noh HJ, Koh JT, Chang HS, Hwang IN, et al. Cytotoxicity of newly developed ortho MTA root-end filling materials. J Endod 2012;38:1627-30. 12.Choi Y, Park SJ, Lee SH, Hwang YC, Yu MK, Min KS. Biological effects and washout resistance of a newly developed fast-setting pozzolan cement. J Endod 2013;39:467-72. 13.Kim JR, Nosrat A, Fouad AF. Interfacial characteristics of Biodentine and MTA with dentine in simulated body fluid. J Dent 2015;43:241-7. 14.Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod 2005;31:450-2. 15.Moule AJ, Kahler B. Diagnosis and management of teeth with vertical root fractures. Aust Dent J 1999;44:75-87. 16.Madarati AA, Qualtrough AJ, Watts DC. Effect of retained fractured instruments on tooth resistance to vertical fracture with or without attempt at removal. Int Endod J 2010;43:1047-