SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Economic Growth on Environmental Pollution: Panel Data Analysis for EU Countries

Enerji ve Büyümenin Çevre Kirliliğine Etkisi: AB Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi

Mehmet Metin DAM
Pages
163–174
Publication Date
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the empirical analysis results obtained by panel data method, the effect of energy consumption on the environment is positive and statistically significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the impact of economic growth end energy consumption for EU countries on environmental pollution was tested using the annual data for the period 2000-2015 using panel data analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a variable, per capita GDP, per capita energy consumption and per capita carbon dioxide emissions were used and a model was estimated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the empirical analysis results obtained by panel data method, the effect of energy consumption on the environment is positive and statistically significant.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küresel Isınma · Çevre Kirliliği · Ekonomik Büyüme

Abstract

In this study, the impact of economic growth end energy consumption for EU countries on environmental pollution was tested using the annual data for the period 2000-2015 using panel data analysis. As a variable, per capita GDP, per capita energy consumption and per capita carbon dioxide emissions were used and a model was estimated. According to the empirical analysis results obtained by panel data method, the effect of energy consumption on the environment is positive and statistically significant.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, AB ülkeleri için ekonomik büyümenin ve enerji tüketiminin çevre kirliliği üzerindeki etkisi 2000-2015 dönemi yıllık veriler kullanılarak panel veri analiziyle araştırılmıştır. Değişken olarak kişi başı GSYH, kişi başı enerji tüketimi ve kişi başı karbondioksit emisyonun alındığı model tahmin edilmiştir. Panel veri analizi yöntemiyle elde edilen sonuçlara göre enerji tüketiminin çevre üzerindeki etkisi pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAM, M. M. (2018). The Impact of Economic Growth on Environmental Pollution: Panel Data Analysis for EU Countries. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 163–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/728627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AHMED, K. & LONG, W. (2012), “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis”, Procedia Economics and Finance 1, ss. 4-13
  2. AKBOSTANCI, E., AŞIK, S. & TUNÇ, İ. (2009). The Relationship between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve?, Energy Policy, 37, 861-867.
  3. APERGIS, N. & PAYNE, J. (2009). “CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage and Output in Central America”, Energy Policy 37, ss. 3282-3286.
  4. ARI, A. & ZEREN, F. (2011). CO2 Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Analizi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 18 (2), 37-47.
  5. BALTAGI, B. H. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2. Ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons. BELLA, G., MASSIDDA, C. & ETZO, I. (2010). A Panel Estimation of The Relationship between Income, Electric Power Consumption and CO2 Emissions, MPRA Paper, 26077. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26077/1/MPRA_paper_26077.pdf
  6. CONSTANTINİ, V. & MARTINI, C. (2006). A Modified Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sustainable Development Assessment Using Panel Data, Climate Change Modelling and Policy, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/73900/1/NDL2006-148.pdf
  7. ÇAĞLAR, A.E. & MERT, M. (2017) Türkiye'de Çevresel Kuznets Hipotezi ve Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketiminin Karbon Salımı Üzerine Etkisi: Yapısal Kırılmalı Eşbütünleşme Yaklaşımı, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 24 (1), 21-38.
  8. ÇINAR, S., YILMAZER, M. & FAZLILAR, T. (2012). Kirlilik Yaratan Sektörlerin Ticareti ve Çevre: Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Karşılaştırması, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13 (2), 212-256.
  9. DAM, M.M. (2014). Sera Gazı Emisyonlarının Makroekonomik Değişkenlerle İlişkisi: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi, (Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi). Adnan Menderese Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın. DIJKGRAAF, E. & VOLLEBERGH, H. (2001). A Note on Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curves with Panel Data, Climate Change Modelling and Policy. http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/othr/papers/0409/0409001.pdf
  10. DRITSAKI, C. & DRITSAKI, M. (2014). Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(4), 125-136
  11. FARHANI, S. & REJEB, J. (2012).
  12. Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Panel Data for MENA Region, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2 (2), 71-81.
  13. HAMILTON, C. & TURTON, H. (2002). Determinant of Emissions Growt in OECD Countries, Energy Policy, 30, 63-71.
  14. HEIL, M.T. & SELDEN, T.M. (1999). Panel Stationar