AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightOverall, the current study conducted with counselors working in public schools and Research and Guidance Centers provided evidence for the reliability and validity of SPRI.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
The current study aimed at adapting “Skovholt Practitioner Professional Resiliency and Self-Care Inventory” (Skovholt, 2012) into Turkish and conducting its reliability and validity study. The participants of the study were 204 (141 female, 63 male) psychological counselors working in public schools or Guidance and Research Centers in Ankara. “Demographic Information Form” and “Skovholt Practitioner Professional Resiliency and Self-Care Inventory (SPRI)” were used as data collection instruments. The results of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) did not support the four-dimensional factor structure (Professional Vitality, Personal Vitality, Professional Stress and Personal Stress) proposed by Skovholt (2012) and indicated a unidimensional factor structure. However, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) conducted to test four-factor structure model yielded satisfactory results (Satorra-Bentler χ2/df = 1.97, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .94, NNFI = .94, SRMR = .08). The internal consistency of the measure calculated by Cronbach Alpha was .92. Overall, the current study conducted with counselors working in public schools and Research and Guidance Centers provided evidence for the reliability and validity of SPRI.