SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yıldız Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of higher education placement indicators of those who are placed in social studies teaching undergraduate programs in Turkey

Arcan AYDEMİR
Aydan USTAOĞLU ÇELİK
Pages
21–33
Publication Date
2021-06-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results showed that the majority of those who were placed in social studies teaching programs in 2019 and 2020 were women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Universities are the cornerstone of higher education and play a key role in allowing members of society to have a profession.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is thought that sharing some information about universi- ties with university candidates will significantly affect their career choices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results showed that the majority of those who were placed in social studies teaching programs in 2019 and 2020 were women.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Social studies teaching program · higher education · higher education program atlas

Abstract

Universities are the cornerstone of higher education and play a key role in allowing members of society to have a profession. It is thought that sharing some information about universi- ties with university candidates will significantly affect their career choices. Thus, this research aimed to examine the social studies teaching programs in public universities in Turkey and various characteristics of students who were placed in these programs in 2019 and 2020 based on the data in the Higher Education Program Atlas, which is sustained by the Council of Higher Education and better known as YOK Atlas. To this end, the research used descriptive content analysis to analyse the data on the social studies teaching programs offered by 62 public universities in Turkey. The research results showed that the majority of those who were placed in social studies teaching programs in 2019 and 2020 were women. The total of the mean correct answers of placed students in the Basic Proficiency Test (BPT) of the Higher Education Institutions Examination increased in 2020 compared to 2019, while the total of the mean correct answers of placed students in the Field Qualification Test (FQT) decreased in 2020. The highest mean correct answers in the total number of questions of the BPT were in Social Studies test in both years, while the highest mean correct answers in the total number of questions of the FQT were Geography-1 test in 2019 and Geography-2 test in 2020. It was also found that Turkish teaching was the second most commonly preferred program after social studies teaching in both years for those placed in social studies teaching.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, A., ÇELİK, A. U. (2021). Investigation of higher education placement indicators of those who are placed in social studies teaching undergraduate programs in Turkey. Yıldız Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 21–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/727438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akpınar, M. ve Kaymakcı, S. (2012). Ülkemizde sosyal bilgiler öğretiminin genel amaçlarına karşılaştırmalı bir bakış. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20 (2), 605-626.
  2. Akpınar, M. ve Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının sosyal bilimlerin temel disiplinlerine karşı tutumları. Milli Eğitim, 158, 137- 145. Aktaş, Ö. ve Aktaş, D. (2019).
  3. Yükseköğretim program atlası (2018) verilerine göre tarih bölümlerinin ve tarih öğretmenliği programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Turkish History Education Journal. 8 (2), 476-498.
  4. Altbach, P. G., and Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11 (3/4), 290-305. Asmalı M., (2020). General picture of english language teaching programs and students in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science/Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 10 (2), 264-275.
  5. Batar, Y. (2010). Öğrencilerin din kültürü ve ahlak bilgisi dersine yönelik görüşleri. Marife, 10 (2), 109-128.
  6. Baturay, M. ve Bay, Ö. (2009). Uzaktan öğretimi tercih eden öğrencilerin demografik özellikleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 17-26.
  7. Baysan, S., Ercan, B. ve Öztürk, A. (2011). Türkiye’de öğretmen yetiştirmede istihdam sorunu: sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliği örneği. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26, 131-154.
  8. Brennan, J. (2008). Higher education and social change. Higher Education, 56, 381-393.
  9. Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (2), 11-53.
  10. Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35 (4), 475-496.
  11. Çelik, Z. (2020). Covid-19 salgınının gölgesinde eğitim: Riskler ve öneriler. Ankara:
  12. Hermes Ofset. Çoban, Ö., Dilek, E. S. ve Harman, S. (2016). Turizm bölümlerini tercih eden adayların tercih eğilimleri: Yükseköğretim lisans atlası üzerine bir araştırma. 17. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. (s.1072-1087). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. Demi̇r, F. ve Oğuz Haçat, S. (2018). Sosyal bilim disiplinlerine göre 2005 ve 2018 sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programindaki kazanimlarin değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS), 2 (2), 27-56.
  13. Demircioğlu, I. H., Kaymakcı, S. ve Demircioğlu, E. (2019).
  14. Ön söz. İ. H. Demircioğlu, S. Kaymakcı ve E. Demircioğlu (Ed.)