Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2015 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Management of adnexal mass in pregnancy: case report and review.

Gebelikte adneksiyel kitleye yaklaşım: olgu sunumu ve derleme.

Pages
13–18
Publication Date
2015-01-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For all these reasons, we wanted to review the diagnosis, follow-up and recent treatment options in the light of literature inspired by a case which has reffered to our clinic with the diagnosis of adnexal mass during pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Adnexal masses during pregnancy which have a wide spectrum treatment from conservative follow -up to complicated surgery have no well established approach algorithm for management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most of these masses are asymptomatic and thanks to rutin ultrasonography in early pregnancy these lesions can be determined easily.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For all these reasons, we wanted to review the diagnosis, follow-up and recent treatment options in the light of literature inspired by a case which has reffered to our clinic with the diagnosis of adnexal mass during pregnancy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adneksiyel · kitle · gebelik

Abstract

Adnexal masses during pregnancy which have a wide spectrum treatment from conservative follow -up to complicated surgery have no well established approach algorithm for management. Most of these masses are asymptomatic and thanks to rutin ultrasonography in early pregnancy these lesions can be determined easily. The majority of them are benign and disappear spontaneously as pregnancy grows. But, if the mass persist, it can be challenging for physician and patient in terms of management. For all these reasons, we wanted to review the diagnosis, follow-up and recent treatment options in the light of literature inspired by a case which has reffered to our clinic with the diagnosis of adnexal mass during pregnancy.

Özet

Konservatif takipten komplike operasyonlara kadar geniş bir spektrumda tedavi gerektiren gebelikteki adneksiyel kitlelere yaklaşımda belirlenmiş bir konsesusu yoktur. Sıklıkla asemptomatik olan bu kitleler erken gebelik döneminde rutin ultrasonografik tarama sayesinde erken dönemde saptanabilmektedir. Büyük çoğunluğu benign olup ilerleyen gebelik haftalarında spontan rezolusyona uğrar ancak persiste eden kitleler hekimi ve hastayı takip ve tedavide zorlayabilir. Bu nedenle biz, ilk antenatal vizitte tesadüfen saptanan ve komplike adneksiyel kitle tanısı ile kliniğimize refere edilen hastamızdan yola çıkarak gebelikteki adneksiyel kitlelerin tanı, takip ve tedavisini literatur verileriyle irdelemek istedik.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEŞECİ, E., KAYATAŞ, S., ÖNCÜLOĞLU, C., DEMİRKIRAN, F. (2015). Management of adnexal mass in pregnancy: case report and review.. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/725506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Kumarı I, Kaur S, Mohan H, Huri A. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: A 5 year Review. Aust N Z Obstet Gynecol 2006;46:52-4. DePriest PD, deSimone CP. Ultrasound screening in the detection of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol.2003;21:194s-9s. Hill LM, et al. The role of ultrasonography in the detection and management of adnexal masses during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol1998;178:703-7.
  2. Whitecar P, Turner S, Higby K. Adnexal masses in pregnancy. A review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1999;181:19-24.
  3. Yakasai IA, Bappa LA. Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Surg Tech Case Rep.2012 Jul-Dec;4(2):79-85.
  4. Bromley B, Benacerraf B. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: Accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and outcome.J Ultrasound Med.1997;16:447-52.
  5. Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating grey-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology1998;208:103-10. McCarthy A. Miscellaneous medical disorders Dewhurst's textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 7th ed. United States: Blackwell Publishing;2007,pp.283-8.
  6. Aslam N, Ong C, Woelfer B, Nicolaides K, et al. Serum CA125 at 11-14 weeks of gestation in women with morphologically normal ovaries.BJOG.2000;107:689-90.
  7. Yuen P, Ng P, Leung P, et al. Outcome of laparoscopicmanagement of persistentadnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy. Surg Endosc.2004;18:1345-7.
  8. Wheeler TC, Flesischer AC. Complex adnexal mass in pregnancy predictive value of color doppler sonography.J Ultrasound Med.1997;16:425-8.
  9. Fleischer AL, Dimesh MS, Entman SS. Sonographic evaluation of maternal disorders during pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1990;28:51. Platek DN, Henderson CE, Goldberg GL. The management of a persistemt adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1995;173:1236. Zanetta G, Mariani E, Lisson A. A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynacol 2003;110:578. Hess LW, Peaceman A, O'Brein WF. Adnexal mass occurring with intrauterine pregnancy: Report of fiftyfour patients requiring laparatomy for definitive management. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1988;158:1029. SoronoD, Yefet Y, Seidman DS. Laparoscopy versus laparatomy in the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril.1999;71:955. Benhard LM, Klebba PK, Gray DL, Mutch DG. Prediction of persistence of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol.1999;9