Journals / Biotech Studies / 2004 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1-2

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PASTURE AND FORAGE PRODUCTION OF TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’NİN ÇAYIR-MERA YEM BİTKİLERİ ÜRETİMİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2004-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, although Turkey has a great potential for forage and pasture production, it has not reached the desired level yet.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this essay, Turkey’s present production patterns of forage and pasture have been evaluated, and the current opportunities available to maximize production have been examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the introductory part, as a general framework, the country geographic location, land area, arable and pastoral lands, ruminant and farming sectors have been delineated with the use of some statistics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, although Turkey has a great potential for forage and pasture production, it has not reached the desired level yet.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çayır · Mera · Yem Bitkileri

Abstract

In this essay, Turkey’s present production patterns of forage and pasture have been evaluated, and the current opportunities available to maximize production have been examined. In the introductory part, as a general framework, the country geographic location, land area, arable and pastoral lands, ruminant and farming sectors have been delineated with the use of some statistics. In the second and third parts, the soil and topographic characteristics along with the climate and agro-ecological zones are presented in-depth. The fourth and fifth parts of the essay cover the ruminant livestock production systems with historical perspectives and pasture resources in the country. And, in the last section, the existing opportunities for improvement of pasture resources have been probed. As a conclusion, although Turkey has a great potential for forage and pasture production, it has not reached the desired level yet.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin mevcut çayır-mera ve yem bitkileri üretim sistemleri değerlendirilmiş ve potansiyel üretime ulaşabilmek için mevcut fırsatlar incelenmiştir. Giriş kısmında, genel bir çerçeve olarak ülkemizin coğrafik konumu, arazi durumu, ekilebilir ve otlanan alanlar, hayvancılık ve çiftlik sektörleri bazı istatistikler kullanılarak tahlil edilmiştir. İkinci ve üçüncü bölümlerde, toprak ve topoğrafik özelliklerle birlikte iklim, tarımsal-ekolojik bölgeler kapsamlı olarak sunulmuştur. Bu tahlilin dördüncü ve beşinci bölümleri tarihi perspektifleriyle hayvancılık üretim sektörünü ve ülkedeki çayır mera kaynaklarını kapsamıştır. Son bölümde, mera kaynaklarının geliştirilmesi için mevcut fırsatlar incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Türkiye, çayır-mera ve yem bitkileri üretimini geliştirmek için büyük bir potansiyele sahip olmasına rağmen, bu üretim henüz istenilen düzeye gelmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FIRINCIOĞLU, H. (2004). AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PASTURE AND FORAGE PRODUCTION OF TURKEY. Biotech Studies, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1-2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/721981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Acar, Z., F. Tosun. 1988. Comparisons of the herbage productions of the four silage maize cultivars sown in the four different row spacing, planted after winter cereal (barley), OMU, Agriculture Faculty, Agriculture Journal, 3(2): 121-128.
  2. Açıkgöz, E. 2001
  3. Forage Crops, Uludağ University, Agriculture Faculty, Department of Field Crops, Reinforcement Foundation Publication Number: 58, Bursa. Akman, N., M. Ertuğrul, M. Türkoğlu. 2001. In the Centenary of Republic Livestock Sector of Turkey. IN: The Proceedings of the Centenary of Republic Symposium on the Agricultural Targets. 30 April to 01 May 2001. A publication of the Turkish Agriculture Engineers Union, p. 215-235)
  4. Alınoğlu, N. 1971. A research on the effects of the continuous grazing and the incrementally resting on the range vegetation, Grassland and Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Ankara, Publication No: 16. Alpay, O. 1970. The planted pasture investigations in the vicinity of Çamkoru and Aladağ areas. Forestry Research Institute, Technical Bulletin, Serial number: 43. Altın, M. 1975. An investigation on the effects of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilization on the herbage yield, the crude protein and ash contents of herbage and botanical compositions in the meadows and native pastures under the Erzurum conditions. Atatürk University Publication No: 326, Agricultural Faculty Publication No: 159, Research Serial Number: 95-141.
  5. Altın, M., A. Gökkuş, A. Koç. 2005. Meadow and Rangeland Rehabilitation. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The department of The Meadow-Rangeland and Forage Crops, Publication ISBN 975-407-188-8. Anonymous 1980. “Soil-water Statistical Bulletin” The General Directorate of Soil-Water, Ankara Anonymous, 1987. General Soil Management Planning of Turkey, The Soil Protection Master Plan, the Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Rural Affairs, The General Directorate of Rural Affairs, the Department of Watershed Rehabilitation and Ponds, Ankara. Anonymous, 2004a. Amendments and Developments in the Agricultural Structure. IN: The Proceedings of the second Agriculture Convention, p. 71-134. Anonymous, 2004b. Plant Husbandry Plant Protection and Environmental Health. IN: the Proceedings of the second Agriculture Convention, p.135-198. Anonymous 2004 d. Agricultural input and Subsidies. IN: The Proceedings of the second Agriculture Convention, p. 365-424. Anonymous, 2004c.
  6. Livestock, Marine Product Husbandry and Health. IN: The Proceedings of the second Agricu