Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Preservice Teachers' Material Preparation Knowledge and Points to be considered While Developing the Material

Pages
425–442
Publication Date
2022-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that priority order for the sub-themes material use and student varied when looked both at knowledge on material preparation process and points that should be taken into account during material developing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to analyze knowledge of preservice teachers on material preparation process for mathematics lesson and their opinions about the points to be considered while developing material.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To that end, 39 preservice teachers in total who studied in Elementary and Secondary School Mathematics Teaching Program at a state university in Southern Anatolia Region in the Fall semester of 2019-2020 academic year and who received "Instructional Technologies" and "Material Design in Mathematics Teaching lessons" were addressed two different open-ended questions in writing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that priority order for the sub-themes material use and student varied when looked both at knowledge on material preparation process and points that should be taken into account during material developing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mathematics · Mathematics Lesson · Materials for mathematics lesson

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze knowledge of preservice teachers on material preparation process for mathematics lesson and their opinions about the points to be considered while developing material. In this context, in addition, it was intended to determine the preservice teachers' differences to use their knowledge on material preparation while developing materials in the course. To that end, 39 preservice teachers in total who studied in Elementary and Secondary School Mathematics Teaching Program at a state university in Southern Anatolia Region in the Fall semester of 2019-2020 academic year and who received "Instructional Technologies" and "Material Design in Mathematics Teaching lessons" were addressed two different open-ended questions in writing. Data obtained as a result of the applications performed were analyzed through content analysis. At this stage, the number of answers given by the students to the open-ended questions was determined and thus qualitative data were quantified. Then, frequency analysis and categorical analysis methods were noted in quantified data. At the end of the study, preservice mathematics teachers’ both knowledge on material preparation process and points to be considered while developing material were gathered under three different sub-themes which are material use, content/design, and student. However, it was observed that preservice teachers focused mostly on content/design of the material among these sub-themes. It was found that priority order for the sub-themes material use and student varied when looked both at knowledge on material preparation process and points that should be taken into account during material developing. It is seen that there are some differences in the priorities of the use of pre-service mathematics teachers' knowledge on material preparation while developing materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇENBERCİ, S. (2022). Preservice Teachers' Material Preparation Knowledge and Points to be considered While Developing the Material. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 425–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/720641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akçay, A. O. (2017). Instructional technologies and pre-service mathematics teachers’ selection of technology. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7), 163-173.
  2. Calik-Uzun, S., Kul, U., & Celik, S. (2019). The impact of instructional technology and material design course on pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.451
  3. Cameron, T., & Bennett, T. (2010). Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 6(41), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01133.x Çenberci S., & Yavuz A. (2018). The correlation between the creative thinking tendency of mathematics teacher candidates and their attitudes towards instructional technologies and material design lesson. World Journal of Education, 8(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n3p95
  4. Demirel, Ö. (2007). Developing Alternative Course Material. Instructional Technologies and Material Design (233-248). (Ed. Ö.Demirel & E. Altun). Ankara:
  5. Pegem A Publishing. Demirel, Ö., Seferoğlu, S.S., & Yağcı, E. (2004). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Dienes, Z.P., & Golding, E.W. (1971). Approach to modern mathematics. New York, NY: Herder & Herder. Duruhan, K., & Şan, İ. (2013). Investigating The Views Of Teacher Candidates About Project Preparing Process Within It&Md Course (Inonu University Case Study), International Journal of Social Science, 6 (7), 379-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1843
  7. Gündüz, Ş., & Odabaşı, F. (2004). The Importance of Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course at Pre-Service Teacher Education in Information Age. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 43-48.
  8. Heddens, J.W., & Speer, W.R. (2006). Today’s mathematics: Concepts, methods, and instructional activities. Danvers. MA: John Wiley & Sons. Hollingsworth, P.M., & Hoover, K.H. (1999). Elementary Teaching Methods; (Translated by. Prof. Dr. Tanju Gürkan, Erten Gökçe, Duygu S. Güler). Ankara:
  9. Ankara University Publishing, No: 214. Kolburan-Geçer, A. (2010). Experience of Technical Teacher Candidates Towards Teaching Tecnologies and Material Development Course. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 1-25.
  10. Kaya, Z. (2005). Instructional technologies and material development. Ankara:
  11. Pegem A Publishing. Kazu, H., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2008). Teacher’s Aims of Using Instructional Tools and