SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The Relationships Among Teachers’ Behaviours That Encourage Students’ Reading Engagement, Reading Enjoyment, Reading Self-Efficacy and Reading Success

Pakize URFALI DADANDI
İbrahim DADANDI
Pages
98–110
Publication Date
2022-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the findings of this study, it is recommended that teachers implement practices to encourage students' participation in reading activities and develop educational interventions to improve reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reading comprehension has a critical importance for almost every aspect of individuals’ life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to reveal the relations among students’ perceptions of their Turkish language teachers’ behaviours that encourage reading engagement, levels of reading enjoyment, reading self-efficacy, and reading success within the frame of a model, using PISA 2018 Turkey data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the findings of this study, it is recommended that teachers implement practices to encourage students' participation in reading activities and develop educational interventions to improve reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:reading engagement · reading enjoyement · reading self-efficacy

Abstract

Reading comprehension has a critical importance for almost every aspect of individuals’ life. The aim of this study is to reveal the relations among students’ perceptions of their Turkish language teachers’ behaviours that encourage reading engagement, levels of reading enjoyment, reading self-efficacy, and reading success within the frame of a model, using PISA 2018 Turkey data. The study is based on the correlational research model and the sample includes 6450 (F= 3247, M= 3203) students who completed the PISA 2018 Turkey questionnaire. The data obtained from the PISA 2018 database were analyzed using the structural equation model (SEM) and the sobel test. SEM analyses revealed that the hypothesized model well fits the data and all the regression paths in the model are statistically significant. According to the research findings, teachers’ behaviours that encourage students’ reading engagement (TBESRE), reading enjoyment, and reading self-efficacy have significant direct effects on reading achievement. In addition, TBESRE has significant indirect effects on reading achievement through reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy, and that reading self-efficacy has a significant indirect effect on reading achievement through reading enjoyment. Considering the findings of this study, it is recommended that teachers implement practices to encourage students' participation in reading activities and develop educational interventions to improve reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy.

🔖

Cite This Article

DADANDI, P. U., DADANDI, İ. (2022). The Relationships Among Teachers’ Behaviours That Encourage Students’ Reading Engagement, Reading Enjoyment, Reading Self-Efficacy and Reading Success. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 98–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/720573

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (1998). Relation between reading comprehension, vocabulary, reading pleasure, and reading frequency. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 143-166.
  2. Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46.
  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
  4. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs for adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich: Information Age. Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27-34.
  6. Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759-772.
  7. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-46.
  8. Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge. Cheema, J. R. (2018). Adolescents' enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: New evidence from a cross‐country survey. Journal of Research in Reading, 41,149-162.
  9. Chen, F., Sakyi, A., & Cui, Y. (2021). Linking student, home, and school factors to reading achievement: the mediating role of reading self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 1-20.
  10. Clark, C. & De Zoysa, S. (2012). Mapping the interrelationships of reading enjoyment, attitudes, behaviour and attainment. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496343.pdf
  11. Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students' amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116-131.
  12. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-17.
  13. Ertem, H. Y. (2020). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and sc