Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5

Research Trends on the Use of Augmented Reality Technology in Teaching English as a Foreign Language

Pages
76–104
Publication Date
2022-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The bibliometric mapping results indicated that related studies mostly focused on the effectiveness of mobile and ubiquitous learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this research is to display research trends in studies on augmented reality (AR) in teaching English as a foreign language by using bibliometric mapping and content analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 64 studies in total published up to 2019 were accessed for bibliometric analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The bibliometric mapping results indicated that related studies mostly focused on the effectiveness of mobile and ubiquitous learning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:augmented reality · bibliometric mapping analysis · research trends

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to display research trends in studies on augmented reality (AR) in teaching English as a foreign language by using bibliometric mapping and content analysis. For this purpose, 64 studies in total published up to 2019 were accessed for bibliometric analysis. In addition, 49 articles published between 2007 and 2019 were reached for content analysis. The bibliometric mapping results indicated that related studies mostly focused on the effectiveness of mobile and ubiquitous learning. In addition, early childhood education, mobile learning, and gamification have become the focus of recent research. While Thorne, Azuma and Squire are the mostly cited authors in this field, Computers & Education, Educational Technology & Society, British Journal of Educational Technology and Computers in Human Behavior are among the journals cited most. Content analysis results revealed that academic achievement and motivation were the most commonly examined variables in the studies. These results revealed that most of the studies were grounded on quantitative research designs, especially experimental designs. Questionnaires and achievement tests were the most used data collection tools. While purposive sampling was the most preferred sampling method, there was an increase in the adoption of random sampling in 2011. Finally, descriptive statistics, T-tests, ANOVA-ANCOVA, and correlation analysis were mostly performed quantitative analysis methods, and content analysis was mostly used in qualitative analysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

TULGAR, A. T., YILMAZ, R. M., TOPU, F. B. (2022). Research Trends on the Use of Augmented Reality Technology in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5, 76–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/720522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aksoy, Y. U., & Dimililer, C. (2017). Teacher opinions on usage of mobile learning in pre-school foreign language learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5405-5412.
  2. Altinpulluk, H. (2019). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1089-1114.
  3. Amaia, A. M., Iñigo, A. L., Jorge, R. L. B., & Enara, A. G. (2016, September). Leihoa: A window to augmented reality in early childhood education. In 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1-6).
  4. IEEE. Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
  5. Avgousti, M. I. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 819-853.
  6. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, p. 355-385.
  7. Azuma, R. T. (2016). The most important challenge facing augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(3), 234-238.
  8. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented Reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  9. Bajura, M., Fuchs, H., & Ohbuchi, R. (1992). Merging virtual objects with the real world: Seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 26, 203-210.
  10. Barreira, J., Bessa, M., Pereira, L. C., Adão, T., Peres, E., & Magalhães, L. (2012). Mow: Augmented reality game to learn words in different languages: Case study: Learning english words of animals in elementary school. Proceedings of Cıstı'2012 - 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 1-6).
  11. Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709-725.
  12. Baykara, M., Gurturk, U., Atasoy, B., & Percin, İ. (2017, October). Augmented reality based mobile learning system design in preschool education. In 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) (pp. 72-77).
  13. IEEE. Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225-232.
  14. Cabero, J. & Barroso, J.