Journals / Participatory Educational Research / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

The Impact of the Argumentation- Flipped Learning Model on the Achievements and Scientific Process Skills of Students

Pages
335–357
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the study’s results, it was determined that the methods applied to the groups did not make a significant difference in the levels of scientific process or in student’s academic success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current study determined the impact of the Argumentation-Flipped Learning (AFL) Model on the scientific process skills and academic achievement of students by performing a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest and retention control group design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected by scientific process skills test and concept test from a total of 112 5th grade students randomly selected from a public school in the 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the study’s results, it was determined that the methods applied to the groups did not make a significant difference in the levels of scientific process or in student’s academic success.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:flipped learning · science process skills · academic achievement

Abstract

The current study determined the impact of the Argumentation-Flipped Learning (AFL) Model on the scientific process skills and academic achievement of students by performing a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest and retention control group design. The data were collected by scientific process skills test and concept test from a total of 112 5th grade students randomly selected from a public school in the 2017-2018 academic year. In the curriculum, Experimental group-I and Experimental group-II students were taught the lesson by argumentation-flipped learning model and Flipped Teaching Method (FTM), respectively. The lessons in the control group were taught by the method where the teacher was the narrator. The information and the activities in the curriculum were presented directly. The study was applied in the “Matter and Change” unit. The data of the study were collected by scientific process skills and academic achievement test. SPSS 22.0 package program was used to analyze the data obtained from the study. Shapiro-Wilk Distribution Test and descriptive statistics were used to determine whether the data showed normal distribution. Furthermore, Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used. According to the study’s results, it was determined that the methods applied to the groups did not make a significant difference in the levels of scientific process or in student’s academic success.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, E., GÜLER, H., SARIGÖL, J., TEPE, B., DEMİRCİ, F. (2022). The Impact of the Argumentation- Flipped Learning Model on the Achievements and Scientific Process Skills of Students. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 335–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/720509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akbaş, Y., Şahin, İ. F. & Meral, E. (2019). Implementing Argumentation-Based Science Learning Approach in Social Studies: Academic Achievement and Students’ Views. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9 (1), 209-245. DOI: 10.33403/rigeo.529139. Akgün, M., & Atıcı, B. (2017). Ters-düz sınıfların öğrencilerin akademik başarısı ve görüşlerine etkisi [The Effect of Flipped Classroom on Learners’ Academic Achievements and Views]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, [Kastamonu Journal of Education] 25 (1), 329-344.
  2. Aslan, S. (2016). Argümantasyona dayalı laboratuvar uygulamaları: Bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve laboratuvar dersine yönelik tutuma etkisi.[Argumentation Based Activities in the Laboratory: The Effect of on Science Process Skills and Attitudes towards Laboratory Course] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi[H. U. Journal of Education],31(4), 762-777. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2016015700. Aslan, S. (2019). The impact of argumentation-based teaching and scenario-based learning method on the students’ academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(2), 171. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=950369
  3. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
  4. Bağ, H. & Çalık, M. (2017). İlköğretim düzeyinde yapılan argümantasyon çalışmalarına yönelik tematik içerik analizi [Thematic Content Analysis for Argumentation Studies at Primary Education Level]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 42 (190), 281- 303. http://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6845
  5. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education(ISTE), Washington DC, (pp. 120-190).
  6. Bhagat, K. K., Cheng-Nan, C. & Chun-Yen, C. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.3.134.
  7. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA. 30(9), 1-18. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585.
  8. Bolat, Y. (2016). The flipped classes and educatıon informatıon network (EIN). J