SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of FOC and DTC for speed sensorless PMSM using

KKG kullanılan hız algılayıcısız SMSM için AYK ve DMK'nin karşılaştırılması

Barış ÇAVUŞ
Mustafa AKTAŞ
Pages
898–903
Publication Date
2022-10-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, it was determined that the DTC and FOC methods are superior and deficient compared to each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, direct torque control (DTC) and field oriented control (FOC) simulation study of a speed sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) is carried out.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total harmonic distortion (THD) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT) analysis of the obtained signals were performed to evaluate the performance of DTC and FOC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, it was determined that the DTC and FOC methods are superior and deficient compared to each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:SMSM · DMK · AYK

Abstract

In this study, direct torque control (DTC) and field oriented control (FOC) simulation study of a speed sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) is carried out. The speed signal required for the control methods was obtained with a sliding mode observer (SMO). As a result of the study, current, speed (measured and estimated) and torque signals of PMSM were obtained. Total harmonic distortion (THD) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT) analysis of the obtained signals were performed to evaluate the performance of DTC and FOC. In addition, DTC and FOC comparisons were made using the root mean square error (RMSE) criterion for the measured and estimated speed signals. In this study, it was determined that the DTC and FOC methods are superior and deficient compared to each other.

Özet

Bu çalışmada hız sensörsüz sabit mıknatıslı senkron motorun (SMSM) doğrudan moment kontrolü (DMK) ve alan yönlendirmeli kontrol (AYK) benzetim çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kontrol yöntemleri için gerekli olan hız sinyali kayan kipli gözlemci (KKG) ile elde edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda SMSM’nin akım, hız (ölçülen ve tahmin edilen) ve moment sinyalleri elde edilmiştir. DMK ve AYK performansının değerlendirilebilmesi için elde edilen sinyallerin toplam harmonik bozunum (THB) ve ayrık dalgacık dönüşümü (ADD) analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca ölçülen ve tahmin edilen hız sinyalleri için hata karelerinin ortalamasının karekökü (HKOK) kriteri kullanılarak DMK ve AYK karşılaştırması yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile DMK ve AYK yöntemlerinin birbirlerine göre üstün ve eksik oldukları durumlar belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVUŞ, B., AKTAŞ, M. (2022). Comparison of FOC and DTC for speed sensorless PMSM using. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 898–903. https://ajindex.com/articles/720186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Saadaoui, O., A. Khlaief, A. Chaari and M. Boussak. A new approach rotor speed estimation for PMSM based on sliding mode observer. in 2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA), 2014.
  2. L. Harnefors, S.E. Saarakkala, and M. Hinkkanen, Speed control of electrical drives using classical control methods. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 49 (2), 889-898, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2914647.
  3. D.-W. Seo, Y. Bak, and K.-B. Lee, An improved rotating restart method for a sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor drive system using repetitive zero voltage vectors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67 (5), 3496-3504, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2914647.
  4. M. Abassi, A. Khlaief, O. Saadaoui, A. Chaari and M. Boussak. Performance analysis of FOC and DTC for PMSM drives using SVPWM technique. in 2015 16th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA). 2015.
  5. A. Kronberg, Design and simulation of field oriented control and direct torque control for a permanent magnet synchronous motor with positive saliency. Master Thesis, Uppsala University, 2012.
  6. G. Chandaka and G. Prasanth, Direct torque control and field oriented control of PMSM using SVPWM Technique. Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng, 3 (11), 2014.
  7. Z. Boulghasoul, A. Elbacha, E. Elwarraki and D. Yousfi. Combined vector control and direct torque control an experimental review and evaluation. in 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems. 2011. F. Blaschke A new method for the structural decoupling of AC induction machines. in Conf. Rec. IFAC. 1971. D. Casadei, et al., FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control. IEEE transactions on Power Electronics, 17 (5), 779-787, 2002. https:// doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2002.802183. S. Rezgui, A. Mehdi, S. Legrioui, H. Meddouce, A.M. Boulahia and H. Benalla. IRFOC vs DTC performance comparison analysis. in 2013 3rd International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems. 2013.
  8. S. Zaid, O. Mahgoub, and K. El-Metwally, Implementation of a new fast direct torque control algorithm for induction motor drives. IET Electric Power Applications, 4 (5), 305-313, 2010. https://do i.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2009.0059. I. Takahashi and T. Noguchi, A new quick-response and high-efficiency control strategy of an induction motor. IEEE Transactions on Industry applications, (5),