✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Besides, it is shown that İsmail Na‘îm Efendi has had a masnawî called “Gülzâr-ı Na‘îm” an even could have a “hamse”.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, it is proved that the mentioned “Divan” is belonged Üsküdarlı İsmail Na‘îm Efendi instead of historian Mustafa Na‘îmâ Efendi.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, it is proved that the mentioned “Divan” is belonged Üsküdarlı İsmail Na‘îm Efendi instead of historian Mustafa Na‘îmâ Efendi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it is shown that İsmail Na‘îm Efendi has had a masnawî called “Gülzâr-ı Na‘îm” an even could have a “hamse”.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dîvân · mesnevî · Na‘îmâ
Abstract
In this article, it is proved that the mentioned “Divan” is belonged Üsküdarlı İsmail Na‘îm Efendi instead of historian Mustafa Na‘îmâ Efendi. Besides, it is shown that İsmail Na‘îm Efendi has had a masnawî called “Gülzâr-ı Na‘îm” an even could have a “hamse”.
Özet
Bu makalede tarihçi Na‘îmâ Efendi’ye (1655-1716) atfedilen bir Dîvân incelenerek söz konusu Dîvân’ın Mustafa Na‘îmâ Efendi’nin değil, Üsküdarlı İsmail Na‘îm Efendi’nin (ö. 1694) olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca, İsmail Na‘îm Efendi’nin Gülzâr-ı Na‘îm adlı bir mesnevîsi olduğu hatta hamse sahibi bile olabileceğine işaret edilmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
SEVGİ, A. (2015). ABOUT A “DIWAN” IS IMPUTED TO HISTORIAN NA‘ÎMÂ EFENDI. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 23, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/72013