Journals / Koşuyolu Heart Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

The Clinical Course of Infective Endocarditis and Independent Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality

Pages
115–121
Publication Date
2022-08-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30.8%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Despite advances in prevention, medical, and surgical treatment, the global prevalence of infective endocarditis (IE) has been gradually rising over the last two decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 104 consecutive patients (>18 years old) who were hospitalized with IE between January 2016 and August 2021 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30.8%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Infective endocarditis · microbiology · epidemiology

Abstract

Introduction: Despite advances in prevention, medical, and surgical treatment, the global prevalence of infective endocarditis (IE) has been gradually rising over the last two decades. However, the profile of IE varies by continent, geographic region, and hospital type. In this study, we aimed to investigate the epidemiological and clinical features of IE and to determine the factors predicting in-hospital mortality. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at a single tertiary health care hospital in Türkiye. A total of 104 consecutive patients (>18 years old) who were hospitalized with IE between January 2016 and August 2021 were included. Modified Duke criteria were used to diagnose IE. Demographic information (age and gender), underlying heart diseases, comorbidities, causative microorganisms, blood culture results, echocardiographic findings, cardiac and extracardiac complications, surgical requirements, and in-hospital mortality were all examined. Results: The study included 104 IE cases (mean age: 57.2 ± 15.9 years; 59.6% males). Fifty-six patients (53.9%) had native valve IE, 37 patients (35.6%) had prosthetic valve IE, and four patients (3.8%) had devicerelated IE. Blood cultures were negative in 62 cases (59.6%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common responsible microorganism in 17 patients [methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in 13 (12.5%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus in four (3.8%)]. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 30.8%. White blood cell count (OR= 1.002, 95% CI= 1.001-1.003) creatinine (OR= 1.45, 95% CI= 1.08-2.00), acute renal failure (OR= 8.60, 95% CI= 2.27-37.81), and cerebrovascular accidents (OR= 4.58, 95% CI= 1.21-18.85) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: In line with developed countries, the epidemiology and causative pathogens of IE in Türkiye have been changing. Investigating these epidemiological and clinical changes may serve as a basis for strategies to be developed for the prevention and treatment of IE.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, H., UYSAL, S., KARAGÖZ, A., TOPRAK, C., ÖCAL, L., EMİROĞLU, M. Y., KAYMAZ, C. (2022). The Clinical Course of Infective Endocarditis and Independent Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 115–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/719119

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Thuny F, Grisoli D, Cautela J, Riberi A, Raoult D, Habib G. Infective endocarditis: Prevention, diagnosis, and management. Can J Cardiol 2014
  2. 30(9):1046-57. [Crossref] 2. Khan MZ, Munir MB, Khan MU, Khan SU, Vasudevan A, Balla S. Contemporary trends and outcomes of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis in the United States: Insights from the nationwide inpatient sample. Am J Med Sci 2021
  3. 362(5):472-79. [Crossref] 3. Olmos C, Vilacosta I, Fernández-Pérez C, Bernal JL, Ferrera C, García-Arribas D, et al. The evolving nature of infective endocarditis in Spain: A population-based study (2003 to 2014) J Am Coll Cardiol 2017
  4. [Crossref] 4. Keller K, Von Bardeleben RS, Ostad MA, Hobohm L, Munzel T, Konstantinides S, et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of infective endocarditis in Germany between 2005 and 2014. Am J Cardiol 2017
  5. [Crossref] 5. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miro’ JM, Fowler Jr VG, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century. The international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2009
  6. [Crossref] 6. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015
  7. 36(44):3075-128. [Crossref] 7. Østergaard L, Valeur N, Ihlemann N, Bundgaard H, Gislason G, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Incidence of infective endocarditis among patients considered at high risk. Eur Heart J 2018
  8. [Crossref] 8. Agca FV, Demircan N, Peker T, Ari H, Karaagac K, Ozluk OA, et al. Infective endocarditis: A tertiary referral centre experience from Turkey. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015
  9. 8(8):13962-968. 9. Leblebicioglu H, Yilmaz H, Tasova Y, Alp E, Saba R, Caylan R, et al. Characteristics and analysis of risk factors for mortality in infective endocarditis. Eur J Epidemiol 2006
  10. 21(1):25-31. [Crossref] 10. Talha KM, Baddour LM, Thornhill MH, Arshad V, Tariq W, Tleyjeh IM, et al. Escalating incidence of infective endocarditis in Europe in the 21st century. Open Heart 2021
  11. 8(2):e001846. [Crossref] 11. Cetinkaya Y, Akova M, Akalin HE, Aşçioğlu S, Hayran M, Uzuns O, et al. A retrospective review of 228 episodes of infective