SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fiscaoeconomia / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

A Literature Review on Higher Education Policy in Turkey and Policy Transfer as a Key Term for Analysis

Cenay BABAOĞLU
Pages
186–203
Publication Date
2018-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is expected that this study may provide a vision for future analysis of higher education policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the concept of policy transfer that have a profound effect on Turkish higher education policy will be used as a key term.
📊
Key Findings & Data:New public management and governance approaches will form the basis of this research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is expected that this study may provide a vision for future analysis of higher education policies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Higher Education · Policy Transfer · Public Policy

Abstract

In this study, the concept of policy transfer that have a profound effect on Turkish higher education policy will be used as a key term. New public management and governance approaches will form the basis of this research. Therewithal evaluations will be made in the context of similarities between different countries’ higher education policy. First of all, the concept of policy transfer is explained and neo-liberal policies and effects on higher education are questioned. To that end, literature review of how neoliberalism affects higher education policy in Turkey will be discussed. It is expected that this study may provide a vision for future analysis of higher education policies.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABAOĞLU, C. (2018). A Literature Review on Higher Education Policy in Turkey and Policy Transfer as a Key Term for Analysis. Fiscaoeconomia, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 186–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/716372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arap, İ. ve Erat, V. (2017). “Türkiye’nin Bilim Politikası: TÜBİTAK Üzerinden Bir Çözümleme”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32 (1), 323-339.
  2. Bauer, M. ve Henkel, M. (1997). ‘Responses of Academe to Quality Reforms in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of England and Sweden’, Tertiary Education and Management, 3 (3), 211-228.
  3. Bennett, C. J. (1991). ‘What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?’, British Journal of Political Science, 21 (2), 215-233.
  4. Bulmer, S. ve Padgett, S. (2005). ‘ Policy Transfer in the European Union: An Institutionalist Perspective’. British Journal of Political Science, 35 (1), 103-126.
  5. Bozeman, B. (2000). ‘Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory’. Research Policy, 29, 627-655.
  6. Bural, N. İ. (2007). ‘Avrupa Birliği Yükseköğretim Politikaları ve Türkiye (Avrupa Yükseköğretim Alanı, Erasmus ve Türkiye İlişkileri)’, Atılım Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Common, R. (2001). Public Management and Policy Transfer in Southeast Asia. Hull: Ashgate. Cook, I. R. (2008). ‘Mobilising Urban Policies: The Policy Transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales’. Urban Studies Journal Foundation, 45 (4), 773-795.
  7. Coşkun, S. (2008). ‘Kamu Yönetiminde Yönetişim Yaklaşımı’, iç. Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, (Ed. A. Balcı, A. Nohutçu, N. K. Öztürk ve B. Coşkun) Ankara: Seçkin, 67-83.
  8. Çelik, Z. (2012). ‘Bologna Süreci’nin Avrupa Yükseköğretim Sistemi Üzerine Etkileri’, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 2, (2), 100-105. Dikmen B.; Yardımcı S. ve Yıldırım Ş. (2011) Sakatlık Çalışmaları: Sosyal Bilimlerden Bakmak, İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  9. Di Maggio, P. J., ve Powell, W. W. (1983). ‘Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  10. Dolowitz, D. P. (2003). ‘A Policy-Maker’s Guide to Policy Transfer’. The Political Quarterly 2003, 101-108.
  11. Dolowitz, D. P. ve Marsh, D. (2000). ‘Learning From Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Comtemporary Policy-Making’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 13 (1), 5-24.
  12. Dolowitz D. P. (2000)
  13. Policy Transfer and British Policy, Learning From The USA, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  14. Dunleavy, P.; Margetss, H.; Bastow, S. ve Tinkler, J. (2005). ‘New Public Management Is Dead-Long Live Digital-Era Governance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16,