Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy of Young Learners: Findings from a Small-Scale Study

İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Çocuklara Yönelik Değerlendirme Okuryazarlığı: Küçük Ölçekli Bir Çalışmanın Bulguları

Pages
548–563
Publication Date
2020-07-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed the mismatches between teachers’ views and practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Assessing language skills is crucial for checking the quality of teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found that the teachers did not adopt the assessor identity due to various barriers; namely, problems in teacher training and development, avoiding assessing productive skills, and the necessity for rater training.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed the mismatches between teachers’ views and practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Değerlendirme okuryazarlığı · yabancı dilde değerlendirme · genç öğrenenler

Abstract

Assessing language skills is crucial for checking the quality of teaching. Teacher assessment literacy plays a vital role in deciding on the quality of classroom assessment. Although assessment is a time-taking process, the assessment of foreign language speaking and writing with their unique characteristics requires more time, effort, and expertise. Moreover, assessing the language production of young learners requires much more attention because the assessment is a part of teaching and has cognitive and socio-cultural foundations. Therefore, this small-scale qualitative research investigated three English teacher’s views and practices on how they assess their young learners’ speaking and writing skills. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and subjected to content analysis. The findings revealed the mismatches between teachers’ views and practices. It was found that the teachers did not adopt the assessor identity due to various barriers; namely, problems in teacher training and development, avoiding assessing productive skills, and the necessity for rater training. The findings suggest that the assessment literacy of the teachers needs to be improved. Therefore, pre-service teacher education programs should emphasise the identity development of language teachers as assessors. Additionally, in-service training is required for enhancing the assessment literacy of the language teachers.

Özet

Dil becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi, öğretimin kalitesini kontrol etmek için çok önemlidir. Benzer şekilde, öğretmen değerlendirme okuryazarlığı sınıf değerlendirmelerinin kalitesine karar vermede hayati bir rol oynamaktadır. Değerlendirme zaman alıcı bir süreç olmasının yanı sıra, yabancı dilde konuşma ve yazmanın kendine has özellikleri ile değerlendirilmesi daha fazla zaman, çaba ve uzmanlık gerektirir. Ayrıca, çocukların dil üretimini değerlendirmek çok daha fazla dikkat gerektirir çünkü değerlendirme öğretimin bir parçasıdır ve bilişsel ve sosyo-kültürel temelleri vardır. Bu olgulara dayanarak, bu vaka çalışması, üç İngilizce öğretmeninin, sınıflarındaki çocukların konuşma ve yazma becerilerini nasıl değerlendirdiklerine ilişkin görüş ve uygulamalarını araştırmaktadır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmış ve içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Bulgular öğretmenlerin görüş ve uygulamaları arasında uyuşmazlıklar olduğunu göstermektedir. Öğretmenlerin, öğretmen yetiştirme ve geliştirmedeki problemler, konuşma ve yazma becerilerin değerlendirilmesinden kaçınılması ve puanlayıcı eğitimi gerekliliği gibi çeşitli nedenlerden dolayı değerlendirici kimliğini benimsemedikleri bulunmuştur. Bulgular öğretmenlerin değerlendirme okuryazarlığının iyileştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, öğretmen yetiştirme programları, yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin değerlendirici kimlik geliştirmeleri üzerinde durmalıdır. Ayrıca yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin değerlendirme okuryazarlıklarını geliştirmek için hizmet içi eğitimler yapılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLÇINAR, S., KARTAL, G. (2020). EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy of Young Learners: Findings from a Small-Scale Study. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 548–563. https://ajindex.com/articles/71289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allal, L. (2013). Teachers' professional judgement in assessment: A cognitive act and a socially situated practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.736364
  2. Baird, J.-A., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. T. (2014). State of the Field Review – Assessment and Learning (Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report, 14/2). Oxford: Knowledge Centre for Education, The Research Council of Norway. Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs (pp. 284-300). New York: Routledge. Benigno, V., & de Jong, J. (2016). The global scale of english learning objectives for young learners: A CEFR-based inventory of descriptors. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer. Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21, 119–132. Büyükyavuz O., & İnal S. (2008). A descriptive study on Turkish teachers of English regarding their professional needs, efforts for development and available resources. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 215-234.
  3. Chou, M. H. (2014). Assessing English vocabulary and enhancing young English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ motivation through games, songs, and stories. Education 3-13, 42(3), 284-297.
  4. Coskun, A. (2016). Causes of the 'I can understand English but I can't speak' syndrome in Turkey. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1-12.
  5. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University. Davison, C., & Leung, C. (Eds.) (2009). Teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, Special Issue 43(3), 389–562.
  6. DeLuca, C. (2012). Preparing teachers for the age of accountability: Toward a framework for assessment education. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5/6), 576-591.
  7. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning, Corwin Press,
  8. Thousand Oaks, CA. Fives, H. and Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of ceachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham and T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook