SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Development And Adaptation Study Of Teachers’ Motivational Support Scale

Öğretmen Güdüsel Desteği Ölçeği Geliştirme Ve Uyarlama Çalışması

Hülya GÜVENÇ
Pages
129–145
Publication Date
2015-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cronbach internal consistency coefficient of the whole scale was found to be .94 for high school and for .92 middle school

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to develop a scale in order to determine the students’ perceptions on their teachers’ motivational support.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose two pilot studies, one of which is to develop and the other is to adapt, were realized. 418 high school and 215 middle school students participated in the validity and reliability studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cronbach internal consistency coefficient of the whole scale was found to be .94 for high school and for .92 middle school
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğretmen desteği · kişisel ilişki · yetkinlik

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop a scale in order to determine the students’ perceptions on their teachers’ motivational support. For this purpose two pilot studies, one of which is to develop and the other is to adapt, were realized. 418 high school and 215 middle school students participated in the validity and reliability studies. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used. Item discriminations were tested and determined, the reliability of scale Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient were calculated. In the end the scale composed of 24 items and four factors that are named as competence support, autonomy support and relatedness support is identified. Cronbach internal consistency coefficient of the whole scale was found to be .94 for high school and for .92 middle school

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğrencilerin öğretmenlerinin güdüsel desteğine ilişkin algılarını belirlemek amacıyla kullanılabilecek bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla biri ölçek geliştirme biri uyarlama olmak üzere iki ayrı çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmalara toplam 418 lise öğrencisi ve 215 ortaokul öğrencisi katılmıştır. Analizler sırasında açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizine başvurulmuş, madde ayırt edicilikleri hesaplanmış, Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik sayısı hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmalar sonunda kişisel ilişki desteği, özerklik desteği ve yetkinlik desteği alt boyutlarından oluşan ölçeğin 24 maddeden oluştuğu belirlenmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda üç boyutlu modelin hem lise hem de ortaokul öğrencileri için uygun olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alpha katsayısı lise öğrencileri için .94 ortaokul öğrencileri için. 92 olarak hesaplanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENÇ, H. (2015). Development And Adaptation Study Of Teachers’ Motivational Support Scale. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 129–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/712

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alfi, O., Assor, A.,& Katz, I. (2004). Learning to allow temporary failure: Potential benefits, supportive practices and teacher concerns. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(1), 27-41.
  2. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
  3. Başaran, İ.E. (1982). Örgütsel davranış yönetimi. Ankara: A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayını, No: 111. Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self- determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32, 470-483.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
  7. Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 642. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. A. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148- 162. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1987). Looking in classrooms. NewYork: PearsonEducation Inc. Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Children's relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 81-99.
  8. Midgley, C., Feldlauffer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992.
  9. Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A late