Journals / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 26

A New Framework For Supply Chain Risk Management Through Supply Chain Management Capability

Tedarik Zinciri Risk Yönetimi içinYeni bir Çerçeve: Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Yetkinliği Modeli

Pages
151–174
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study provide relevant findings both to guide practitioners and motivate researchers to conduct further studies in this area

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supply chain risk management is considered as one of the most powerful competitive tools for the companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This model is the first attempt to illustrate the required supply chain risk management capabilities of companies for different supply chain orientation levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study provide relevant findings both to guide practitioners and motivate researchers to conduct further studies in this area
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi · Risk Yönetimi · İş Süreç Yönelim

Abstract

Supply chain risk management is considered as one of the most powerful competitive tools for the companies. Therefore, the concept has caught the attention of researchers especially in the recent years. However, supply chain risk management has not been examined in the literature by considering the maturity and capability levels of supply chain members. This study aims to address this gap and develops a new framework on supply chain risk management which focuses on different supply chain orientation levels of the supply chains members. The framework proposed in this study is named as “Supply Chain Management Capability Model”. This model is the first attempt to illustrate the required supply chain risk management capabilities of companies for different supply chain orientation levels. This model presents developing supply chain structures with increasing orientation levels, which also serve for Business to Business (B2B) and relationship marketing purposes. The results of this study show that supply chain members’ capability levels also vary in terms of sustainability dimension. The results of the study provide relevant findings both to guide practitioners and motivate researchers to conduct further studies in this area

Özet

Tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi, firmalar için en kuvvetli rekabetçilik araçlarından biri olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu konu, özellikle son yıllarda araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmeye başlamıştır. Ancak literatürde, tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi, tedarik zinciri üyelerinin olgunluk seviyeleri ve yeterlilikleri göz önünde bulundurularaktan incelenmemiştir. Bu çalışma, tedarik zinciri risk yönetiminin farklı tedarik zinciri yönelimlerine göre değerlendirildiği yeni bir çerçeve geliştirmeyi ve böylece literatürede belirtilen açığa katkı sağlamayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmada önerilen çerçeve “Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Yeterlilik Modeli” olarak isimlendirilmiştir. Bu model, firmaların farklı tedarik zinciri yönelimlerine göre beklenen tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi yeterliliklerini göstermek ve tanımlamak amacıyla yapılan ilk girişimdir. Bu model artan yönelim seviyeleri ile gelişen tedarik zinciri yapılarını göstermekle beraber şirketler arası pazarlama ve ilişkisel pazarlama amaçlarına da hizmet etmektedir. Ayrıca çalışmanın temel bulguları, tedarik zinciri yeterlilik seviyelerinin sürdürülebilirlik boyutunda da farklılık gösterebileceğini belirtmektedir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, uygulamacılara yön verecek ve araştırmacıları yeni çalışmalara teşvik edecek bulgular sağlamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, A., YUMURTACI, İ. Ö., YURT, Ö., BALTACIOĞLU, T. (2015). A New Framework For Supply Chain Risk Management Through Supply Chain Management Capability. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 26, 151–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/711555

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akintoye, Akintola, McIntosh, George, and Fitzgerald, Eamon, ‘A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry’, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, p. 159-168.
  2. Anderson, James C., ‘Relationships in business markets: exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No.4, 1995, p. 346-350.
  3. Arnulf, Jan K., Dreyer Heidi C., and Grenness, Carl Erik, ‘Trust and knowledge creation: how the dynamics of trust and absorptive capacity may affect supply chain manage- ment development projects’, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2005, p. 225-236.
  4. Bahinipati, Bikram K., Kanda, Arun, and Deshmukh, S. G., ‘Coordinated supply manage- ment: review, insights, and limitations’, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2009, p. 407-422. Blos et al., ‘Supply Chain Risk Management SCRM: A Case Study on the Automotive and Electronic Industries in Brazil’, Supply Chain Management-An International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2009, p. 247-252.
  5. Boute, Robert, Dierdonck, Roland Van, and Vereecke, Ann, ‘Organising for supply chain management’, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2011, p. 297-315.
  6. Carlock, Danielle M., and Perry, Anali Maughan, ‘Exploring Faculty Experiences With E- Books: A Focus Group’, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, p. 244 – 254. Christopher, Martin, and Lee, Hau, ‘Mitigating Supply Chain Risk through Improved Con- fidence’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2004, p. 388-396.
  7. Christopher, Martin, and Peck, Helen, ‘Building the Resilient Supply Chain’, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004, p. 1-14.
  8. Christopher, Martin, and Juttner, Uta, ‘Supply Chain Relationships: Making the Transition to Closer Integration’, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000, p. 5-23.
  9. Corsten, Daniel, Gruen, Thomas, and Peyinghaus, Marion, ‘The effects of supplier-to-buyer identification on operational performance—An empirical investigation of inter-orga- nizational identification in automotive relationships’, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2011, p. 549-560.
  10. Elkington, John, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21stCentury, (Gabriola Island: NewSociety Publishers, 19